• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Agnaa

Agnaa

VS Battles Super Moderator Administrator Calculation Group Human Resources Diamond Supporter
From 👖👖👖👖👖👖
Joined
Last seen
Managing account details
Messages
16,312
Reaction score
14,839

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Currently in a nadir of interest. Not reading my profile or notifications. If there's anything important, DM me. ==================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================== Currently in a nadir of interest. Not reading my profile or notifications. If there's anything important, DM me.
    FantaRin_The_First
    Yo, Agnaa. I need some calc-ing advice regarding this calc of mine. No need to approve or look at it. I just need you to answer a question. You see: calc features a tree and an explosion, but can't see the full height of either the tree or explosion due to weird camera angle, the only person who raised an issue with this is a person called @TheRustyOne.

    However, I repeatedly asked KLOL if this is an issue but received no confirmations 3+ times, and a person named @Chariot190 has stated that "the amount of tree cut off, and the amount of explosion cut off, should be about the same. Though that still doesn't mean it's perfect pixel scaling given how pixel scaling works, but it shouldn't be THAT far off from the true yield."

    Can you tell me what I should do, Agnaa?
    View previous comments…
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    You might be able to scale off the tree trunk's width, if that's a known value.
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    I'm back to ask another question because I regard you as extremely reliable on matters like this. In regards to feats that aren't shown directly but are directly stated and visual confirmation of it happening, is there no need to calc it? To explain my reason for asking this, basically, I have a character that directly stated that they moved shipping containers/trailers and the camera pans out to show several shipping containers/trailers stacked atop of each other - there is also a statement that this character did it all by themselves and with no help. Essentially, this is a decent LS feat.

    So... is there no need to calc this feat, and just assume the low-ball weight of a shipping container/trailer and call it a day?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    You could do that. It'd technically still be a calculation, just a really simple one.
    FantaRin_The_First
    Been calcing something from a book that was adopted into a tv show, and have a question to ask. Basically, I have a feat in the book that was in the show and was exactly the same but showed the general timeframe on how long the feat took. The feat in the book doesn't have a timeframe for how long it took, so can I use the timeframe from the tv show?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    That's sorta something that's up to experts in the verse, but it's probably allowed.

    It may not be allowed if the show seriously diverges from the book in a fuckton of ways, if there's multiple adaptations and you're cherrypicking one that has the best timeframe, or if there's some other weirdness that makes it non-canon.

    But 99% of the time it'd be okay as long as the feat's the same.
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    Thank you. The tv show shouldn't have any of the issues that you presented, so no worries.

    Although, I do have one more question... it regards the feat itself. Basically, the person in question punched another person 2-to-3 kilometers away, the distance was expressed in an internal monologue that was cut from the tv show but should still apply... Getting to the point, I just need to apply the kinetic energy formula, 0.5*(weight)*(speed)^2, right?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Dinamic8000
    Hi! So, in the matchs addition thread is there a incognito as if Guts vs Yoriichi would be valide to be added in the profiles considering there was a misunderstood regarding the Berserk Armor

    I personally don't think that this was the main point of debate or that it would change the opinion of anyone regarding the result, but i would very much appreciate you opinion regarding this
    FantaRin_The_First
    Hey, hey, fanta here! Agnaa, I need you to look at this calc. It isn't mine, but another person, however, it features calcs that support a calc of mine in the verse that will be very helpful in proving my calc isn't an outliner. If you have any issue with the calc, I could contact the creator and ask them to fix the issue.

    vsbattles.fandom.com

    Danganronpa: Town Level Despair - Big Bang Monokuma Feats

    vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
    Recon1511
    Hello Agnaa, this is a 9-A calc not only useful for the Platinum Sperm and Golden Sperm multipliers (which you pointed out needs a new value as the Jet Nice Guy calc was incorrect) but also for the featless Demon Level threats and A class heroes in One Punch Man since the Sky Folk Tiger level 8-B scaling is now invalid.

    The monster was defeated by Snek, the lowest ranked A class hero so it fits the bill of "average A class hero that a single Black Sperm cell can defeat" and the rest of the A class should be superior or comparable to him. The monster is also a Tiger level threat so featless Demon levels would upscale from it

    Would you mind evaluating it? Kulf Boba, the author of the calc, gave me permission to ask for evaluations for this calc. Thank you for your time.
    First_Witch
    Oi Agaga, are you perhaps knowledge about our piercing energy rules regarding bullets? I have heard that you need durability far higher than the energy the bullet carries due to surface stuff. So following situation: Character A uses rubber bullets with a custom gun, based on a exosting model. Said gun and rubber bullet can cleanly shoot through car doors, like a normal gun could. Now Character B gets shot at with said weapon, but does not take any life threatening damage and looks generally unharmed (No penetration through the bullet, no blood drawn). Would that yield anything higher than the kinetic energy of the bullet?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    We allowed it briefly in 2 verses ~4 years ago, but we decided to stop using it. We only use surface area to nerf feats (characters not tanking the full surface area of explosions), not to buff feats (no-selling attacks with small surface areas compared to their body).
    ImmortalDread
    Do you dislike using quotes? What are reasons? I can't find one since the notification remain same tbh
    View previous comments…
    ImmortalDread
    ImmortalDread
    You can edit both and write in both source editing if you know how BB code works. For example, I am struggling with HR line, so I need to switch to BB code to make my threads look better (take an example of Acc type 5 thread). Unsure what you do you mean, but controlling where the quote begins or ends can work in BB code, at least for me. Btw, I think I understand now, you see “undo/redo” signs? The bracket is BB code source editor.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Oh shit, I never noticed that lmao. I'll get to using that then. Thanks.

    I tried looking in the "more options" menus but couldn't find it, and didn't think that button would do anything useful.
    ImmortalDread
    ImmortalDread
    HAHAHAHHA, then I helped your future with this. Imao, I am using it constantly, so anything you want, you can ask me. I am an expert (solved tons of issues with bb code XD)
    Expectro2000xxx
    Sorry to bother, but since you are knowledgeable with various things and I believe to have saw you sometimes in threads regarding higher d stuff I wanted to solve a question I have.

    Sending someone to a higher dimensional realm mean that said bfr is stronger/more potent than a bfr that send someone to a three dimensional place? The dimensionality of the destination really affect the potency of the bfr or just the range of it? Have saw different opinions regarding this so I would like to solve this doubt.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    idk
    Expectro2000xxx
    Expectro2000xxx
    I see, no problem then, will try asking another staff to see.
    FantaRin_The_First
    Hey, hey, fanta here! Ready to throw you two questions at once!

    First off, since I have seen that you are a Medaka Box Supporter... Any idea on where the 8-B Rating for Medaka Box chars come from? Am just confused on why they are 8-Bs, tbh.

    Secondly. remember the user blog that contains three calcs that you refused to look at it... I just wanna ask. in your opinion, should I just split it up to three different user blogs or should I keep them where they are?
    View previous comments…
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    Hey, hey, fanta here. Just want to say that I made the edits to my user blog that you told me to do. Now, the result are 9-A, which is a bit saddening but results are results (even if the characters in whom this user blog might apply to are already 8-C Tier and my og intent was to upgrade them to a higher tier, kek). I also found a cloud feat as I was looking for the stat sheet for a Glasgow, calc'ed it, and found that it might be applicable to characters' physical stats, so yay, I suppose-lucky me, kek.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Really I'd expect it to be 9-B with how thin those doors are.

    If you asked whether it'd be an upgrade on 8-C I'd have told you it definitely wouldn't have been.
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    Kek, true true.

    Thanks for your help, tho.
    Catpija
    Hello Agnaa

    Since you're one of the knowledgeable member of the Medaka Box verse, and a calculation group member, can you give your input regarding this thread please?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    I absolutely can.
    FantaRin_The_First
    Hey, hey, Fanta here. It's that time of the day again, Agnna. Less of a help for calc but more asking for calc advice.

    Basically, I have something I want pixel scaled for attack potency purposes.

    However, it is impossible to get one of the dimensions (width) to find out its volume in its shot, however, there is another shot that showcases a good shot of the thing I want pixel scaled - and has a thing with a known height that can help pixel scale - so it is possible I can use this image to get the dimensions, thus, its volume or no and I have to make do with the first shot even if I can't find that thing's width?
    FantaRin_The_First
    Hey, hey, fanta here! It is time for moi to ask for your help in looking into my calc and telling me of the errors/approving it.

    vsbattles.fandom.com

    Code Geass AP Calculation Collection

    vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com

    Three calcs in one user blog - thankfully, each calc only has one result each. The first two calcs are the ones that I talked about you extensively about in the past few days. And the last one is just a simple ground explosion calc. Truthfully, you can just look at one, and I can find other CGM to ask (read: bug) about this.

    Also to explain: first calc is about a superweapon(s) that consistently one-shot people, second calc is about the physical stats of people in the verse, and the third calc relates to the weapons that the character in the verse hold and use... Yes, I am going to use this in a CRT, if you are wondering.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    I am going to have to reject your request.
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    Tis fine, thank you for your quick reply, tho!
    Blackcurrant91
    Yo, am I allowed to comment on the staff only thread for acausality type 5 for warhammer specifically?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Sure, I remember you being knowledgeable and reasonable. Thanks for asking.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Okay actually that turned out to be kinda useless, DaReaperMan already posted that scan. Consider deleting that post, I guess?
    Blackcurrant91
    Blackcurrant91
    roger.
    FantaRin_The_First
    Hey, hey, fanta here. I am 'bout to show ya something, it is a picture of a hole. I need your opinion about its shape. A good friend of mind told me to use rectangular volume for it -
    and I can do that, I have another frame of the same shot that shows a person passing through the hole to pixel scale from, and the picture you see now is something I picked out in order to help you judge the best shape, thus, I wanna hear your opinion about this. Also, to say it now, this is about the last calc-related thing you should hear from me for awhile, don't want to bother you more than I already have about calc stuff.

    View previous comments…
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Wait, is the hole you're calculating just the one in the door, or is it including everything behind it?
    FantaRin_The_First
    FantaRin_The_First
    Just the one in the door.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    V. Frag, imo. But you can just list multiple ends and whoever evaluates it will pick one.
    DaReaperMan
    About Acausality 5 having nobody who qualifies...

    Warhammer Acausality 5 is probably still fine, they've got feats of being unaffected by even Irregular flows of Causality and the only things that interact with anything from the warp in either 40K, AoS, or Fantasy, are magical/enchanted weapons or straight magic. Kinda like a NEP 2 being socking another NEP 2 being, it's using the exact same stuff they're made of in the first place on them
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    idk, you can bring that up in the thread tho.
    ImmortalDread
    I agree with your reasoning and disagreement on that topic. It seems rather punishing person where there the rule itself allowed him.
    I struggled to debate on it because it seems for me incon (with old rules).
    ImmortalDread
    ImmortalDread
    Don't you see the reasoning behind the topic ban is unfair itself? The staff is still debating on who will win.
    The Vs. thread itself is not against wiki rules. I won't talk anymore there. But I simply want to know which rule he violated.
    This is all, and I believe transparency in judgment is best. Involving his old past violations (he mentioned he only did this one, and the old previous are 2 years old) is a bad argument to begin with because those old violations are already dealt with.
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    Agnaa said:
    If you don't know all the reasons that Goku vs Saul would be unworkable (Goku being able to nuke Saul from 4km away as soon as the match starts, dearth of information on Goku's motivations and no way to stall for time to discover them, Goku being able to power up and speed blitz, Saul's convincing taking time that he doesn't have, Saul's convincing having worked in limited situations and still resulted in bodily harm coming to the people involved to the extent of probably being ruled an incap loss, Saul's convincing having numerous anti-feats), despite knowing one of the verses involved well, then you can't really be trusted to make reasonable matches involving that verse.
    Click to expand...
    ImmortalDread
    ImmortalDread
    Understandable. I won't comment anymore.
    KobsterHope07
    Hello, hello.

    I saw the notifications on two of my calc blogs. Thanks for the notifs, but is the other method in those blogs okay
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    It's much closer, but not quite. The main substantive thing, is that I'd use the density of flame (0.3 kg/m^3) instead of the density of air. And I use veeery slightly different values for temperature change and heat capacity, but those would barely change the results at all. You can see this calc for an example.
    FantaRin_The_First
    Hey, hey, fanta here, and I require your help... not input on my calcs, but I need your knowledge (again).



    Do you know the possible correct shape for this? I can't make heads or tails of it.
    Mr_Sugabz
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    What do you need the middle value for?

    But it would be 0.13 + ((0.2-0.13)/2), or 0.165
    Mr_Sugabz
    Mr_Sugabz
    hmm I'm arguing with my friend actually. And, is this different from the average formula in mathematics?
    Example: (0.2+0.3+0.4 ........ 0.11+0.12+0.13) Then divided by how many data there are?
    Agnaa
    Agnaa
    The conventional average formula doesn't really work for infinite sets; there's an infinite amount of values between 0.2 and 0.13

    But there's many ways to reach the answer I described. (0.2+0.13)/2 also reaches the same answer for all endpoints.

    And intuitively, you could imagine it working the same way as the ordinary average formula. If you add each of the numbers on either side of the extreme, the average of that pair would cancel out to the midpoint. That gets done for every single number in the infinite set.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top