- 2,273
- 392
This is literally in the OP lmao.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
The remains of the Tiering Revision, part 2
- Thread starter KingPin0422
- Start date
- Status
- 168,579
- 77,390
That seems like a good idea.
- 168,579
- 77,390
Your draft seems good to me, but I am a bad person to ask.
Also, given the name and definition changes, we might need a thread dedicated to verifying that the character profile pages with conceptual manipulation in the powers and abilities sections have the correct types listed.
Also, given the name and definition changes, we might need a thread dedicated to verifying that the character profile pages with conceptual manipulation in the powers and abilities sections have the correct types listed.
- 4,302
- 2,800
Looks fine.
- 1,280
- 1,123
- Thread starter
- #168
If Tago doesn't mind, I made a few minor adjustments to his draft because there were some grammatical errors.
Anyway, I like what Tago proposed and think that it can be implemented, although I am not sure if a separate thread is needed for it or not.
Anyway, I like what Tago proposed and think that it can be implemented, although I am not sure if a separate thread is needed for it or not.
- 4,302
- 2,800
CM can likely be solved as a bot edit and then a CM thread to help revise any incorrect CM types based off the new summaries, I can fully change Beyond-dimensional existence (just need a name, and since the sandbox for it didn't have types, i'm wondering if it still needs types). Once that is finished, I can begin immediately. Irrelevant Lifting Strength is a problem, as we would need a comprehensive list of all 1-A and above characters. Irrelevant Speed and Transduality need two separate threads after all of these revisions have been applied. I would say Speed first, since that would be the easier one to edit, since we would still have the 1-A and above comprehensive list. Also, not as confusing as Transduality.
- 2,273
- 392
I think somebody already has an at least mostly comprehensive list of 1-As since the quantity has definitely been counted. The removal of type 1 and 3 for transduality is something related to this thread and something that has been entirely uncontroversial, the only controversial thing brought up about it was potential deletion or fundamental restructuring; which obviously should be discussed in another thread if ever.
- 168,579
- 77,390
The problem is that I am tired and distracted by real life and multiple other forum tasks at the moment, and as such I have a hard time focusing on getting this properly organised. As such, would appreciate help from the rest of our staff both in that regard and with applying the accepted results of this revision.
- 4,302
- 2,800
Antvasima, do your thing.
Bobsican
He/Him- 21,651
- 6,291
Both.
There's a ton of staff, but a good chunk of them don't want to do their "duty", which is why I think some of them should be demoted out of a lack of consistent work on this regard, even if "well-behaved".
- 1,280
- 1,123
- Thread starter
- #177
While I agree that we have a handful of staff members who could be demoted, this isn't the time nor the place to be talking about that.
-----
-----
This seems like a good idea to me. Regarding Beyond-Dimensional Existence, I'm fairly certain the consensus was to not have it have types anymore and just strip it down to the very basic idea (being devoid of spatial or temporal properties), hence the new name of "Aspatio-Temporal/Adimensional Existence." which would have to be applied by a staff member since I don't think regular users have that ability.
- 4,302
- 2,800
Now that I think about it, aren't a large sum of beyond-dimensional existence profiles blocked?
- 1,280
- 1,123
- Thread starter
- #179
Oh, yeah. The vast majority of them are on tier 1 profiles, which we always lock. I'm also pretty sure that we never really gave out types 0 or 1 to anyone, considering the lists of examples for both are still empty after all this time.
- 16,008
- 8,264
I am also cool with helping make the edit with a bot and helping with making updates. I am fine with Tago's draft for conceptual manipulation; asides, my opinions has not changed much on the changes.
Just clarifying, we are waiting for more staffs inputs to start the page revision?
Just clarifying, we are waiting for more staffs inputs to start the page revision?
- 168,579
- 77,390
It is more that we need some member or members who know what they are doing to write up a structure regarding how we should apply the revisions that we have agreed about so far. I am too distracted and busy to properly handle it.
@AKM sama @Promestein @DontTalkDT @Ultima_Reality @SomebodyData @The_real_cal_howard @Dragonmasterxyz @Celestial_Pegasus @Soldier_Blue @Saikou_The_Lewd_King @Andytrenom @DarkDragonMedeus @Wokistan @Mr._Bambu @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Ogbunabali @Abstractions @Colonel_Krukov @Shadowbokunohero @Mindovin @Crazylatin77 @Jvando @Zaratthustra @SamanPatou @Just_a_Random_Butler @Dino_Ranger_Black @Gemmysaur @JustSomeWeirdo @LordGriffin1000 @Theglassman12 @Crabwhale @Eficiente @GyroNutz @DarkGrath @The_Wright_Way @Moritzva @Firestorm808 @DemonGodMitchAubin @Everything12 @Duedate8898 @Planck69 @KingTempest @The_Impress
Would any of you be willing to help us out in this regard please?
- 20,106
- 10,899
I’m fine with the concept hax and lifting strength/speed changes. Neutral on the rest since I don’t know much about them.
Abstractions
Femur Breaker
VS Battles
FC/OC VS Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Human Resources
- 2,639
- 2,831
These changes look fine and if help is required I will be available to assist in a few days, as I'll be busy with caretaking in the meantime.
- 19,236
- 6,517
I am willing to help with the updates.
- 4,302
- 2,800
Bump.
- 4,061
- 1,714
BTW what is "hyperverse+"?
- 168,579
- 77,390
We do not have such a tier. We do have High Hyperverse level though.
Tiering System
The following is a comprehensive overview of the hierarchical system the VS Battles Wiki utilizes to properly categorize and index fictional characters, entities, and objects based on the scale of their feats and the varying scopes that they can affect or create/destroy. Though Destructive...
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 168,579
- 77,390
@AKM sama @Promestein @DontTalkDT @Ultima_Reality @SomebodyData @The_real_cal_howard @Dragonmasterxyz @Celestial_Pegasus @Soldier_Blue @Saikou_The_Lewd_King @Andytrenom @DarkDragonMedeus @Wokistan @Mr._Bambu @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Ogbunabali @Abstractions
This is an extremely important revisions thread. I would greatly appreciate your help with organising what we need to do here. Thanks in advance for any help.
This is an extremely important revisions thread. I would greatly appreciate your help with organising what we need to do here. Thanks in advance for any help.
- 20,611
- 17,610
I'll do what I can when I can. Can't really promise more than that.
- 11,141
- 14,184
There are currently 1327 pages that link to Conceptual Manipulation. But if all that needs to be changed is the number of type, I think it can be done by a bot. I can take care of this.
There are about 500 pages in Tier 1 and 0. If we just need to change the word from "Irrelevant" to "Immeasurable", this can also be done by a bot. I can take care of this.
Is there something I am missing?
- 168,579
- 77,390
Thank you very much for helping out. It is very appreciated.
@KingPin0422 and other members here who are able to answer.
Also, in what manner do we need to rewrite the Conceptual Manipulation and Lifting Strength pages?
- 6,605
- 4,155
Just copy/paste my draft for Conceptual Manipulation.
- 7,142
- 4,658
Lifting Strength would just need the section of the table mentioning Irrelevant Lifting Strength removed, I believe everything else is fine.
- 6,605
- 4,155
- 168,579
- 77,390
Okay.
Thank you. Are the rest of you fine with this suggestion? It might need a far more indepth revision of all profile pages with the conceptual manipulation ability, if I have not misunderstood.
- 7,142
- 4,658
I'm fine with the suggestion. As for changing the profile pages, as far as I know, most profiles would be fine with just a number change as their current justifications (if actually correct for the Type they currently have on their profile, which is a whole separate issue) would be as applicable for the "new" Types they will get as the ones they currently have. Any issues with the slight changes to the "new" Type 3 will be minor and can be done in individual CRTs after the bot has done its work.
- Status
Similar threads
