- 168,565
- 77,374
What do you think about Yuri's comments @Ultima_Reality ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That doesn't matter much when we already make an explicit distinction between lacking a certain concept and being superior to it outright, and the proposal that I outlined above aligns more with the latter than the former, which you can probably see in the fictional examples I gave. The conundrum with Timeless Voids was likewise focused primarily on locations that are just stated to lack time, or to be outside of it, without further context and not taking space into account, as well as the contradiction that occured when characters that are clearly restricted to moving at finite speeds are able to move in such voids; that example falls under the former case, and is thus unrelated to my point.This is the problem.
We equate things not be quantifiable or not having anything to quantify to them being higher form of something, which is wrong in pretty much all situations.
A good example would be moving in a timeless void. We litteraly concluded that they weren't usable for speed feat, but the proposal for Irrelevant is now different: "concepts of time and space flat out doesnt exist, so there's nothing to be quantified".
Timeless Voids litteraly fit this criteria more than the characters we would scale to it, mainly because it isn't considered as a speed thing to begin with.
There very much is. The Hounds, as I said, still abide by some form of movement and causation, just one that takes place in 4-dimensional space, within a higher coordinate plane. Meanwhile, Nyarlathotep occupies no point in time or space whatsoever, and is not subject to either of those in any form. That's the distinction here: Being an inhabitant of a larger coordinate space that just extends above the time-axis of a given universe, and not being extended into any space and/or time to begin with. How that relates to speed is something I elaborated on down there, so, keep scrolling I guess.Thing is that it never was treated as speed though.
It just treats of the nature of reality, and you don't have a difference being made between the Hound and them
(the Hound being one-time characters to begin with, which couldn't move through space correctly).
There's not much difference between the Hound and Nyarlathotep in term of how they move or interact with the lower world in that regard
"Speed" is just the absolute value of velocity, which itself is just the measure of the rate at which an object changes position in a given coordinate plane. Obviously, if your existence trivializes the very idea of a position in space, then this notion is entirely incoherent, and thus, beneath you. Can you find any logical fault in this? I haven't done much beyond reading through the later parts of this thread, so, apologies if that was already addressed, but I haven't really seen much on that front besides you calling it "headcanon" (Provided I'm reading this right, that is), which I don't think was ever substantiated.What we lack is still the idea that it is speed, and not some correlation we're making just because both are linked to time and distance here.
Being superior is also something we don't see as speed tho. Just see how transcending time doesnt qualify as Immeasurable.That doesn't matter much when we already make an explicit distinction between lacking a certain concept and being superior to it outright, and the proposal that I outlined above aligns more with the latter than the former, which you can probably see in the fictional examples I gave. The conundrum with Timeless Voids was likewise focused primarily on locations that are just stated to lack time, or to be outside of it, without further context and not taking space into account, as well as the contradiction that occured when characters that are clearly restricted to moving at finite speeds are able to move in such voids; that example falls under the former case, and is thus unrelated to my point.
This one is more a matter of where you can move rather than how fast you move tho. It isn't much different from the old "higher dimensional being are Immeasurable" since they move through more axis.There very much is. The Hounds, as I said, still abide by some form of movement and causation, just one that takes place in 4-dimensional space, within a higher coordinate plane. Meanwhile, Nyarlathotep occupies no point in time or space whatsoever, and is not subject to either of those in any form. That's the distinction here: Being an inhabitant of a larger coordinate space that just extends above the time-axis of a given universe, and not being extended into any space and/or time to begin with. How that relates to speed is something I elaborated on down there, so, keep scrolling I guess.
The result would naturally be Infinite speed though. We already treat transcending stuff such as distance as Infinite for instance."Speed" is just the absolute value of velocity, which itself is just the measure of the rate at which an object changes position in a given coordinate plane. Obviously, if your existence trivializes the very idea of a position in space, then this notion is entirely incoherent, and thus, beneath you. Can you find any logical fault in this? I haven't done much beyond reading through the later parts of this thread, so, apologies if that was already addressed, but I haven't really seen much on that front besides you calling it "headcanon" (Provided I'm reading this right, that is), which I don't think was ever substantiated.
@KingPin0422 @AKM sama @QuasiYuriCan somebody remind me about what we currently need to do here please?
Okay. Thank you for the summary.We need to finalise Beyond-Dimensional Existence's new name and Types, sort out what's going on with Irrelevant Speed, and start talking about what's going on with Transduality.
In such cases, that'd just mean we are not interpreting the character's relationship with the flow of time as one of superiority, due to how vague the term "transcends" is. Immeasurable Speed at its core is already defined as movement beyond linear time, and existing on a level that's ontologically superior to it (Like, say, seeing a spacetime continuum as fiction) would already fulfill this criterion.Being superior is also something we don't see as speed tho. Just see how transcending time doesnt qualify as Immeasurable.
It is, because when it comes to higher-dimensional areas whose nature is fully spatial, they could still be bound under linear time, and thus be subject to S = D/T. That's not the same as existing in a state where linear time as a whole is just a lower spatial dimension which you can freely move through and access any point of.This one is more a matter of where you can move rather than how fast you move tho. It isn't much different from the old "higher dimensional being are Immeasurable" since they move through more axis.
Infinite speed still involves being a part of the coordinate plane, just on a level where your actions take place in 0 time, or in some fringe cases, where your speed is such that it can only be expressed by, say, the limit of S = D/T as T → 0. Moreover, that rating is given to characters that can only bypass any distance because of the "Can go anywhere instantly" aspect of it, and if they instead bypass both distance and linear time, they should be Immeasurable by definition.The result would naturally be Infinite speed though. We already treat transcending stuff such as distance as Infinite for instance.
I already said that Irrelevant Speed, under the definition I am proposing, would only involve superiority over said measures, instead of just operating on some alternate system that doesn't abide by them, so none of that actually addresses the argument..Not abiding by a certain measure is also different from being above it all, in the same category.
And I think calling it headcanon isn't too far of my point of view.
It isn't because something isn't measurable that it is a new, higher form of speed.
You still haven't found any fault with the argument I outlined up there, beyond reiterating the whole "Being unable to be measured doesn't mean you are superior to it," which I already addressed at the very start of the discussion, and associating the idea with Infinite speed, which is wrong even if we exclude Irrelevant Speed from the equation entirely and focus only on things up to Immeasurable. Logical inferences are not a bad thing by any means, especially when the basic definitions of what we're dealing with support them.And there's the fact that so far, nothing, be it fiction (although I don't doubt there may be exception), theorical stuff, etc.. linked the idea to possessing a higher level of "speed beyond speed".
Thank you very much for helping out.So... I did apply the conceptual manipulation revisions earlier. But it seemed that Irrelevant lifting strength was still being discussed. What is the conclusion?
@Ultima_Reality @QuasiYuriGiven that Ultima and Yuri suddenly stopped arguing about it, I'd say that we haven't reached a conclusion yet. They might need to be notified with a reminder that they still need to settle this matter.
@KingPin0422 @AKM sama @Ultima_Reality @DarkDragonMedeusCan somebody write a summary of everything that we still have to decide and do here please? I can send a notification to our other staff members after that.
@DontTalkDT @KingPin0422
Would you be willing to collaborate to restart this thread in our staff forum with only the remaining tasks here mentioned in the first post?
@KingPin0422 @DontTalkDT @Ultima_Reality @AKM sama @Elizhaa @DarkDragonMedeusI can make the next thread for Transduality and what to do with it, unless I'm required to have DontTalk help me do so. The question is, are we supposed to only go over Transduality, or should Irrelevant Speed/Lifting Strength and Beyond-Dimensional Existence be included as well? I'd be fine with keeping BDE the same (especially with my current stance on the Transduality revision), but I think that it is important that we address the Irrelevant statistics.
If we can't do it now, though, then maybe in yet another part? It does seem that people only pay attention to one thing at a time when it comes to this thread, which is why we've only completed the Conceptual Manipulation portion after all this time. Focusing on one thing at a time might actually be a better way to go about this revision so that participants don't have so much information to digest all at once. It's up to what you guys think, though.
Well, there was discussion on it, and the decision went back and forth. Ultimately we didn't change anything on that regard. Conceptual Manipulation revision was already applied.Irrelevant lifting strength should preferably not remain
That was Conceptual Manipulation, actually. Type 1 Transduality is still there.Didn't @AKM sama already remove the old definition of Transduality Type 1 with his Bot account, or was that something else?
I guess...? I'm still open to just not having types of BDE, but then we'd have to give it a new name. Alternatively, we could nix type 3 and just have type 2 be a broad "transcends all extensions of dimensionality up to X tier" that applies to 1-A and up equally, since you can have dimensions even at such scales in the current system. In that way, you could theoretically also be 1-A and only qualify for type 1.Beyond-Dimensional Existence seems to be a very odd fit with our current system.
Alright then.Like Ultima, I also think that we need to redefine Irrelevant speed, to not get a huge gap in our types of definitions.
Well, lifting strength is a matter of how much mass/weight you can lift. Infinite LS means you can lift objects even if they have a mass of ∞, Immeasurable LS means you can lift objects which do not abide to our usual physical notions of mass and thus cannot be measured using such things, and Irrelevant LS, if we follow the pattern of Speed ratings, would logically mean that you have no reliance on the need for "mass" or "strength" at all. Characters who have Irrelevant Speed will probably always have Irrelevant Lifting Strength to go with it and vice versa, which I think is fine because it's not like the idea of giving one thing as a consequence of another thing is foreign to us or something we avoid doing.Irrelevant strength seems to be entirely dependent on "transcending dimensions" and our old definitions for 1-A though, so that should probably be removed.