• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Lifting Strength, Tier 11, & Tier 0

Status
Not open for further replies.
I still prefer Ineffectual, but will go wherever the votes land.
 
For the record, I also think that "Insubstantial" seems like our best available option here. 🙏
 
I agree with you that ineffectual doesn't fir the category and while Inutile is correct its also an obscure word. I think insubstantial is the better alternative to the name.
Insubstantial does looks like a good option, from the discussion; inutile seems really obscure and is more so associated with French basically translating as useless.
"Insubstantial" or "Infinitesimal" sound best to me given how obscure of a word "Inutile" is.
I still prefer Ineffectual, but will go wherever the votes land.
For the record, I also think that "Insubstantial" seems like our best available option here. 🙏
@Antvasima Is this enough support to apply this change?
 
I think so, yes. 🙏
 
I think so, yes. 🙏
@Celestial_Pegasus @Andytrenom @Wokistan @Ultima_Reality @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @LordGriffin1000 @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @GrathOfLux @Dereck03 @Planck69 @LephyrTheRevanchist This part of my proposal still needs evaluation.
Also, I would like to propose that we remove the note at the bottom of the page that claims that Infinite and Immeasurable LS are "literally impossible" IRL because it makes no sense. If this note refers to the best feats accomplished in nature, it would also include anything above Class M because that's the most anything has ever lifted IRL. If it refers to modal possibilities, it's obvious nonsense because models of a universe where infinite or higher-dimensional weight exist can work perfectly fine in math.
 
I think that "hypothetically & literally impossible in real life" is accurate. It's referring to modal possibilities over our laws of physics.

Still, I think the note's unnecessary, since many parts of our stat pages serve the same purpose, and we haven't had problems due to lacking that note there.
 
I also do not mind if we remove that note. 🙏
 
I'm fine with either insubstantial and infinitesimal, without splitting hair in half, they convey the same general idea.

Insubstantial does looks like a good option, from the discussion; inutile seems really obscure and is more so associated with French basically translating as useless.
Italian as well and Italian >>> French.
 
Seems reasonable based on the info you provided.
I think that "hypothetically & literally impossible in real life" is accurate. It's referring to modal possibilities over our laws of physics.

Still, I think the note's unnecessary, since many parts of our stat pages serve the same purpose, and we haven't had problems due to lacking that note there.
I also do not mind if we remove that note. 🙏
Can I apply all of this now?
 
Yeah should be good.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top