XSOULOFCINDERX
They/Them- 21,382
- 9,049
Why was the 8-A calc ever accepted in the first place if the flaws were so blatant and easily uncovered?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why was the 8-A calc ever accepted in the first place if the flaws were so blatant and easily uncovered?
i don't really know, I wasn't around then and I think it was just people neglected to really check. Not accusing anyone of anything but like I am just as confused as you.Why was the 8-A calc ever accepted in the first place if the flaws were so blatant and easily uncovered?
I've never played Arrow Fell and Weekly did not even mentioned the Combustion Dust. I just saw the line in game that said it melts the blocks.Why was the 8-A calc ever accepted in the first place if the flaws were so blatant and easily uncovered?
Actually, I checked the history and Weekly actually did it correctly at first.the premise of the calc is wrong but like
also of note is the fact that latent heat of vaporization (i.e BOILING) was used for a statement of melting
even IF the premise was correct it drops down to like 42 tons if done correctly lol
Mind if I add this to my RVR report?Actually, I checked the history and Weekly actually did it correctly at first.
But changed it to vaporization afterward. If you look, Weekly made his edit at March 20, 05:56, which is 5:56 am.
Looking at my comment, I made my evaluation at March 20, at 4:57 am. If you hover your mouse over my comment's time you can see it.
That's almost one hour after I gave my evaluation.
Note: When this calculation was made it wasn't used for scaling or upgrading anyone, they were all 7-C and Low 7-B at the time. Which is why I probably never noticed the change, because I didn't have any reason to look back at this blog and I was avoiding RWBY talk.
When the 8-A calc had to be used, that was during March 14 at 2024. I also did not take part in the downgrade thread, as I've been worn out with RWBY on this site.
I probably should've realized it when I saw the blog again after seeing they were downgraded, so I do take responsibility for not noticing it at that point.
I had just forgotten the feat was originally 43 Tons.
oh my god lmfaoActually, I checked the history and Weekly actually did it correctly at first.
But changed it to vaporization afterward. If you look, Weekly made his edit at March 20, 05:56, which is 5:56 am.
Honestly he probably thought the calc had to be changed because if it were to upgrade them then why, they were already 7-C/Low 7-BActually, I checked the history and Weekly actually did it correctly at first.
But changed it to vaporization afterward. If you look, Weekly made his edit at March 20, 05:56, which is 5:56 am.
Looking at my comment, I made my evaluation at March 20, at 4:57 am. If you hover your mouse over my comment's time you can see it.
That's almost one hour after I gave my evaluation.
Note: When this calculation was made it wasn't used for scaling or upgrading anyone, they were all 7-C and Low 7-B at the time. Which is why I probably never noticed the change, because I didn't have any reason to look back at this blog and I was avoiding RWBY talk.
When the 8-A calc had to be used, that was during March 14 at 2024. I also did not take part in the downgrade thread, as I've been worn out with RWBY on this site.
I probably should've realized it when I saw the blog again after seeing they were downgraded, so I do take responsibility for not noticing it at that point.
I had just forgotten the feat was originally 43 Tons.
I see no problem with that.Mind if I add this to my RVR report?
That makes little sense, he changed the calc to vaporization when the text in game says melting and he originally calculated it as melting.Honestly he probably thought the calc had to be changed because if it were to upgrade them then why, they were already 7-C/Low 7-B
This deserves a calc ban at the very least. I think a ban from CRT participation may also be good, I've heard Weekly is infamous for using scummy stonewalling tactics.Snip
Well, Weekly is already serving a 2-year forum ban, so...This deserves a calc ban at the very least. I think a ban from CRT participation may also be good, I've heard Weekly is infamous for using scummy stonewalling tactics.
Still banned until August of 2025.Isn’t Weekly still banned from the site in general already or has that run out?
What did my man do
Years worth of offenses that would be too long to list.What did my man do
Best to just read the report that is linked and look back. This thread isn't about Weekly's original ban, that kind of talk can take place someone else more appropriate.What did my man do
Bro is still bannedIsn’t Weekly still banned from the site in general already or has that run out?
Wow. This is worse than I thought. Back during my last active period years ago, Weekly pretty consistently attempted to highball RWBY unreasonably as I recall. I see that Weekly didn't change much over the years.oh my god lmfao
We have one 8-A feat8-A is from the calc
Seems legit at a glance.The Queen Lancer durability isn't really a calculation, I just added the results from this calc. You can see the explanation of what I'm doing in the blog itself.
Note: I still think this rating is fine, since a single case is 249 Tons of TNT and Weiss threw 14 cases worth of dust at it. The Queen Lancer is FAR bigger than the source of the explosion as well, which is why the ISL was not needed either. (Using it would actually increase the results beyond the original value, which is not possible)
For scaling, it'd scales to Dust Injected Hazel, who defeated Weiss's summon of the Queen Lancer while she was being enhanced by Jaune's Semblance. It of course scales to her Arma Gigas as well, since it defeated the Queen Lancer. I don't remember who else would scale to that or not. You all will have to deal with that yourselves.
But I'm not going to fight it if you all disagree with me.
Weiss has a calculation that is 8-A here. However, I cannot say if RWBY's energy system would allow them to scale to this value.
Oscar has an 8-B+ feat as well, but it was performed by using some of kinetic energy stored in Ozpin's cane.
It's not just the Arrowfall feat, it's also the Queen Lancer scaling.8-A is from the calc
yeahIt's not just the Arrowfall feat, it's also the Queen Lancer scaling.
Should they scale to the Queen Lancer though? I don't think that's the right direction to go, given the circumstances.It's not just the Arrowfall feat, it's also the Queen Lancer scaling.
The main cast should scale above it by the time they get to Atlas seeing as they could harm Cordovin's Mech which is like Tier 7 last I checked.Should they scale to the Queen Lancer though? I don't think that's the right direction to go, given the circumstances.
They should scale relative to the Queen Lancer if that calc is fine to go. It got destroyed by Hazel and Weiss’s knight so not seeing an issue with scaling people to it.Should they scale to the Queen Lancer though? I don't think that's the right direction to go, given the circumstances.
Cordovin’s Mech one shot Jaune and Nora with 0 effort, they do not scale to it anymore than a bee would scale to a human for piercing our skin. Only feat I recall where they did something that would be considered scaling is Ruby making it stumble backward with a slash when it was off balance.The main cast should scale above it by the time they get to Atlas seeing as they could harm Cordovin's Mech which is like Tier 7 last I checked.
Also there is the maiden downscaling you agree with tooThey should scale relative to the Queen Lancer if that calc is fine to go. It got destroyed by Hazel and Weiss’s knight so not seeing an issue with scaling people to it.
Now my issue comes in when we realize the amount of horrible, horrendous, absolutely mind numbing scaling chain that results from that because of Hazel and the knight.
Cordovin’s Mech one shot Jaune and Nora with 0 effort, they do not scale to it anymore than a bee would scale to a human for piercing our skin. Only feat I recall where they did something that would be considered scaling is Ruby making it stumble backward with a slash when it was off balance.
Cordovin’s Mech one shot Jaune and Nora with 0 effort, they do not scale to it anymore than a bee would scale to a human for piercing our skin. Only feat I recall where they did something that would be considered scaling is Ruby making it stumble backward with a slash when it was off balance.
Please don't bring other franchises into thisIron Man (Marvel Cinematic Universe)
Anthony Edward "Tony" Stark is an eccentric self-described genius, billionaire, playboy and philanthropist, and the former head of Stark Industries. Using his own great wealth and exceptional technical knowledge, Stark enjoyed the playboy lifestyle for many years until he was kidnapped by the...vsbattles.fandom.com
Friendly reminder that we currently scale MCU Iron Man to Large Country level+ for drawing a single drop of blood from Thanos
Honestly a better example is Winter straight up cutting off Cinder’s arm. While it had no aura, it was still strong enough to match another maiden (Raven.) Grimm are also durable on their own too, being able to threaten and kill huntsmen.Homelander took zero damage from that explosion, the bruise was the worst thing he's ever got. Note that Maeve was shocked to see him bruised, implying she's never seen him hurt. So yes, he took no damage from that blast. Iron Man drew blood from Thanos with a blunt attack and took some hits. Though he is still downscaling.
Ruby, using a sharp weapon, pierced through the mech. Which isn't comparable to its full body Kinetic Energy. Knocking it off balance isn't scaling when it was already off balance to begin with. The mech one shotted both Jaune and Nora, and Jaune was amping them with his Semblance.
Size does matters. We don't scale Kirishima for stabbing into Gigantomachia's arms, due to the fact he's vastly smaller and is dealing with significantly less area.
Also, if they do end up scaling to 249 Tons of TNT. The Mech is only 1565.57 Tons of TNT, which is around a 6x difference.
This is still in the range of being able to cause slight damage, especially with weapons as well.