• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, that is actually a good point. A realm that is not made out of lower things, and cannot be contained within any amount of dimensions of space and time, should not be able to lie on an ordinary 3-D Earth.

How the hell can you argue 1-A to be ontologically transcendent to typical mathematics, but not consider blatant things like that to be contradictions?
That's not actually the argument. The point is less that and more "The building on Earth is a gateway to the higher realm and not the higher realm in-and-of-itself." If it actually was the whole realm somehow circumscribed inside of ordinary space, though, I obviously would agree.

It's more on the matter that it was accessed through a location in the lower world. Something that would be a disqualifier for 1-A for other series if there weren't other evidence to explain why that doesn't matter? (correction, the house is in long island).
Not exactly. The point about the inaccessibility of 1-A is that the processes of the lesser world can't arrange themselves in a way that they add up to something that breaches into the 1-A layer of reality. There's nothing particularly wrong with there being a gateway to a 1-A realm that's been inserted by a higher being, and otherwise is not actually the structure of the realm itself.

The point of concern, I believe, would not actually be this. It would be "How do the characters appear to have actual presence and influence inside this 1-A reality?", which is a way better mode of attack and the thing that draws out real concern, imo.
 
That's not actually the argument. The point is less that and more "The building on Earth is a gateway to the higher realm and not the higher realm in-and-of-itself." If it actually was the whole realm somehow circumscribed inside of ordinary space, though, I obviously would agree.
I'd still want to be quite careful with that. It couldn't actually be a direct portal, where some process on the lower layer can transport people to the higher layer. It would have to be a point that something on a higher layer arbitrarily selects to teleport people from.

And, generally, making sure that such an explanation is actually consistent with events (i.e. the interior shouldn't be noticeably affected by exterior events, characters with 3-D scale cosmic awareness shouldn't be able to see into it, etc.)
The point of concern, I believe, would not actually be this. It would be "How do the characters appear to have actual presence and influence inside this 1-A reality?", which is a way better mode of attack and the thing that draws out real concern, imo.
Eh, I don't think that part's too big. A higher entity could just grant and revoke that.
 
No, that is actually a good point. A realm that is not made out of lower things, and cannot be contained within any amount of dimensions of space and time, should not be able to lie on an ordinary 3-D Earth.

How the hell can you argue 1-A to be ontologically transcendent to typical mathematics, but not consider blatant things like that to be contradictions?
Wouldn't that just be Tier 1-A potential?
 
I'd still want to be quite careful with that. It couldn't actually be a direct portal, where some process on the lower layer can transport people to the higher layer. It would have to be a point that something on a higher layer arbitrarily selects to teleport people from.

And, generally, making sure that such an explanation is actually consistent with events (i.e. the interior shouldn't be noticeably affected by exterior events, characters with 3-D scale cosmic awareness shouldn't be able to see into it, etc.)
True. If there's a fight going on outside of the portal and somehow earthquakes from the outside are felt on the inside, for example, that's problematic. (Though it can be chalked up to PIS depending on how adamant the verse otherwise is about the realm's transcendence and the potential fewness of wacky scenarios like this)

Wouldn't that just be Tier 1-A potential?
Jesse what the **** are you talking about.
 
I think Narnia deserves 0, if Tolkien's verse is getting Eru to 0. Yes, I understand that the latter has a better mention of where Eru scales, but the point remains that the two verses are quite similar just within their own settings.
 
If the "Reality/Unreality" dichotomy in question is actually "the distinction between non-1-A and 1-A," though, or something like that, then transcending it would be High 1-A at least.
So the same thing can be extrapolated for something like a High 1-A and a layer into High 1-A cosmology and so on, where it would completely transcend the meta-qualitative layers and be meta-meta-qualitative or something?

EDIT: Also how will this affect Plurality or characters that exist in multiple truth states?

Would you also be willing to spare some time to evaluate this thread as it relates to the standards of Beyond-Dimensional Existence.
I also welcome other staff to give their input too.
 
Last edited:
FDYAAmkWYAM7hrA.jpg


Sorry, forgot we can’t have fun in VS Battle Wiki.
Im stealing this pic
 
I think SCP ought to be removed on account of it lacking a coherent narrative, being just fanfiction, and being written with powerscaling in mind tbh...
If that were to be real, then the number of current tier 0's will get dropped almost into an oblivion, and thank God, cuz I'm tired of seeing another tier 0 SCP character. Makes tier 0 feel less special
 
I think SCP ought to be removed on account of it lacking a coherent narrative, being just fanfiction, and being written with powerscaling in mind tbh...
This has already been refuted more times than I can count.
 
If that were to be real, then the number of current tier 0's will get dropped almost into an oblivion, and thank God, cuz I'm tired of seeing another tier 0 SCP character. Makes tier 0 feel less special
SCP won't be Tier 0 at all under the new system, just High 1-A.
 
We all agree that a new scp will appear coincidentally that fits the new system, right? When that moment comes, let's act surprised.

In fact, I bet one of the writers is reading this right now. Hi!
This mocking is baseless. A Monad or a collection of all possibilities doesn't fit with SCP's themes, and the authors reputable enough to do one regardless aren't interested.
 
scp authors reaction after seeing that they wrote stacks of narratives, absurdly powerful hax and a giant cosmology only to be neg diffed by a character created in the 14th century by Dante Alighieri. (he didn't even know what powerscaling was)
staring-meme-bald-guy-staring.gif
What if every author from 14th century and before knew about powerscaling and waited for specific group of nerds to make it sprout even more
 
It's funny that isekai characters keep appearing, whose creators strive to make them as powerful as possible, only to continue being neg diffed by a random god from Cthuluh mythos.
 
Last edited:
It's funny that isekai characters continue to appear, whose creators strive to make them as powerful as possible, only to continue being neg diffed by a random god from Cthuluh mythos.
Isekai authors watching their overbuffed mc get fodderised by some lovecraft character written centuries ago
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top