• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
@Eminiteable - I'm pretty certain Luffy has only withstood Katakuri's attacks (as in took them while at WORST being staggered momentarily) on occasions where he used Haki.

Otherwise, attacks that Katakuri has landed have left Luffy bloody, vomiting blood, incapacitated, or missing parts of his body (which are reflected in the scans shown--granted a few of them are after Luffy began evolving and entered the key where he has 7-A+ dura anyways).
  • Minor nit-pick, if you were referring to the kick Kata landed with the "light in the eyes" comment, he wasn't using Haki and was looking to pin Luffy to the wall and suffocate/trap him. But if you mean when Luffy took the punches just before that, he was still badly hurt from the attack--granted still 7-A+ durability anyways since he has other feats of barely withstanding such hits.

Not saying Luffy's Dura is MASSIVELY beneath Kata's AP, but it's still a large gap. Keep in mind that we keep "At least x tier, possibly y tier" because of situations like this:

Gear 4th Bound Man is High 7-A, Katakuri is clearly weaker than Bound-Man in AP/Dura by a considerable margin, but has shown that he is capable of dishing out damage (albeit with Haki) and can still fight competitively--albeit through more complex means than a "head-on" engagement, Luffy with Gear 2nd and 3rd are far inferior to Katakuri's capabilities w/ and w/out awakening (both being ~420MT), so for these reasonings of Kata obviously being >> Gear 2nd/3rd by a pretty large margin, but being less powerful than Bound-Man Luffy, it only makes sense for him to be "At least 7-A+, Possibly High 7-A" as he is clearly >550MT (due to showing feats above Gear 3rd Luffy with casual effort), but <1.26GT due to being physically rag-dolled and injured by Bound-Man Luffy, and having 0 feats of actually clashing with his attacks head-on.

Similarly, after evolving and becoming stronger with Kenbun Haki and in general, Luffy was still beneath Katakuri by a considerable amount--but was still capable of posing a threat and could stop a couple attacks (if only for a moment and inconsistently), hence why his Gear 3rd scales to baseline 7-A+ since he's still inferior to Kata.

And before someone tries to bring up that point of Kata deflecting the Kong-Gun with Power Mochi... ... ... ... a deflection from the side (that didn't even stop the attack) clearly requires far less power than actually meeting the strike head-on. Kata could easily be 7-A+ and still perform this feat that requires more timing/precision than actual force. I don't appreciate this one instance being used as "concrete evidence" that somehow Katakuri is = or comparable to Bound Man in power (when he went even with Snake Man, which is weaker but faster).

Also, someone keeps bringing up Luffy referring to Kata as being "tough" when the context implies tough as in "difficult" or "persistent", definitely the former. Has nothing to do with power or durability.
 
Last edited:
I agree with your post, he is weaker than boundman but wouldn't Snakeman still be in the High 7-A range (it's weaker than boundman but I'm assuming not a tier weaker since it's not mentioned on the profile) and Kat and Snakeman seemed pretty much equals:
 
Last edited:
Also, someone keeps bringing up Luffy referring to Kata as being "tough" when the context implies tough as in "difficult" or "persistent", definitely the former. Has nothing to do with power or durability.
My bad, I wasn't clear.
I meant to say that when Luffy called him tough, he started landing more hits on Bound Man.

I never stated they went equal with Bound Man in terms of power. If they can harm them, they scale. That's how it has always worked.

When Katakuri composed himself, Luffy stated "he's back to being tough again". Feats of Tough Katakuri to Gear Fourth Luffy?
 
Last edited:
I agree with your post, he is weaker than boundman but wouldn't Snakeman still be in the High 7-A range (it's weaker than boundman but I'm assuming not a tier weaker since it's not mentioned on the profile) and Kat and Snakeman seemed pretty much equals:

You're right, the profile doesn't support the idea that Snake-Man should drop a tier, but it should. Refer to the bottom of this comment for more context.

Unfortunately there is no implication of Snake-Man being comparable to Bound-Man in any case. From feats alone, we have seen that there's enough to determine Tank Man (stuffed) > Bound Man > Snake Man in power.

Tank Man (stuffed) blasted through several biscuit soldiers and one-shot Cracker while Bound-Man has only been seen destroying one biscuit soldier with a single punch (granted, he overpowered a thrust attack and there was still some power left as the punch kept going. The shields from the biscuits could stop his attacks--at the cost of them being shattered), and Bound Man caused devastating damage to Katakuri and easily overpowered his physical + haki defenses while Snake-Man went roughly even--actually implied to be slightly weaker than Kata in terms of Durability since we see him in pain from their clashing fists.

Basically the following:

Gear 4th: Tank Man being >1.26GT (above Bound-Man and having superior feats against Cracker in both AP/Dura) | >1.65GT (2nd key)

Gear 4th: Bound Man being =1.26GT (nothing has changed) | =1.65GT (2nd key)

Gear 4th: Snake Man being >>550GT but <1.65GT (2nd key. Nearly equal to Katakuri and could take him down. At least significantly above his Gear 2nd/3rd.)

So Snake Man should be "At least 7-A+, likely High 7-A" via scaling to Katakuri. This is a minor mistake.

_____

@KingTempest - Luffy definitely referred to Katakuri's Future-Sight as being his strength in the previous chapter and is insistent that it is the only thing keeping him from being overwhelmed by Gear 4th. With the ability to see the future, we are shown that BM Luffy can't land a strike due to Katakuri using his mochi manipulation to shift his body around the attacks, then we see in 885 (iirc) Luffy's attacks being deflected by perfectly timed strikes adjacent to the punch trajectory.

We know from both exchanges between Gear 4th Luffy and Katakuri in 884 and 885 (again iirc) that Katakuri has been able to land punches on Luffy for a while, but he didn't exactly leave any severe injuries over the course of 25 minutes of this encounter. He has the AP to do some harm to Bound-Man (with Haki), but not enough to fully scale if we're taking it at face value.

(Also before anyone mentions "but he sent Luffy flying twice", Luffy's a literal rubber ball in that state, he's going to bounce away if he's not applying resistance)
 
You're right, the profile doesn't support the idea that Snake-Man should drop a tier, but it should. Refer to the bottom of this comment for more context.

Unfortunately there is no implication of Snake-Man being comparable to Bound-Man in any case. From feats alone, we have seen that there's enough to determine Tank Man (stuffed) > Bound Man > Snake Man in power.

Tank Man (stuffed) blasted through several biscuit soldiers and one-shot Cracker while Bound-Man has only been seen destroying one biscuit soldier with a single punch (granted, he overpowered a thrust attack and there was still some power left as the punch kept going. The shields from the biscuits could stop his attacks--at the cost of them being shattered), and Bound Man caused devastating damage to Katakuri and easily overpowered his physical + haki defenses while Snake-Man went roughly even--actually implied to be slightly weaker than Kata in terms of Durability since we see him in pain from their clashing fists.

Basically the following:

Gear 4th: Tank Man being >1.26GT (above Bound-Man and having superior feats against Cracker in both AP/Dura) | >1.65GT (2nd key)

Gear 4th: Bound Man being =1.26GT (nothing has changed) | =1.65GT (2nd key)

Gear 4th: Snake Man being >>550GT but <1.65GT (2nd key. Nearly equal to Katakuri and could take him down. At least significantly above his Gear 2nd/3rd.)

So Snake Man should be "At least 7-A+, likely High 7-A" via scaling to Katakuri. This is a minor mistake.
I see, it would probably be appropriate to add a note or something on Luffy's profile which covers that not all Gear Fourth Forms are equal which will result in less confusion on Katakuri's tier.

Also I believe Damage has proposed we treat the multiplier increase of Boundman differently based on the wording, it wouldn't change the tiers but it would mean Boundman scales to a lower value.
 
@Eminiteable - What would the lower value be? "Several" has a low-end of 3. and Doflamingo was referring to Luffy's tensile force (where he uses his ability to pull his fists/feet/head inwards before firing them off upon contact) affecting his attack power, raising it "several times beyond his previous limit" and Doffy has engaged both Gear 2nd and 3rd Luffy and isn't ignorant of their power.
 
You're right, the profile doesn't support the idea that Snake-Man should drop a tier, but it should. Refer to the bottom of this comment for more context.

Unfortunately there is no implication of Snake-Man being comparable to Bound-Man in any case. From feats alone, we have seen that there's enough to determine Tank Man (stuffed) > Bound Man > Snake Man in power.

Tank Man (stuffed) blasted through several biscuit soldiers and one-shot Cracker while Bound-Man has only been seen destroying one biscuit soldier with a single punch (granted, he overpowered a thrust attack and there was still some power left as the punch kept going. The shields from the biscuits could stop his attacks--at the cost of them being shattered), and Bound Man caused devastating damage to Katakuri and easily overpowered his physical + haki defenses while Snake-Man went roughly even--actually implied to be slightly weaker than Kata in terms of Durability since we see him in pain from their clashing fists.

Basically the following:

Gear 4th: Tank Man being >1.26GT (above Bound-Man and having superior feats against Cracker in both AP/Dura) | >1.65GT (2nd key)

Gear 4th: Bound Man being =1.26GT (nothing has changed) | =1.65GT (2nd key)

Gear 4th: Snake Man being >>550GT but <1.65GT (2nd key. Nearly equal to Katakuri and could take him down. At least significantly above his Gear 2nd/3rd.)

So Snake Man should be "At least 7-A+, likely High 7-A" via scaling to Katakuri. This is a minor mistake.
Okay, this makes sense to me honestly. I'm fine with this.
 
Okay, so Boudman > Snakeman = Katakuri, meaning Katakuri is either baseline H7A or borderline 7A+, wouldn't that still raise Luffy's dura? I don't understand how Luffy gets 550MT Dura from being damaged by an attack around 1GT.

Also, this is 5 page long now, in which page Zoro's dura being H7A was discussed? I really don't want to read 400 posts to find it.
 
Last edited:
Also, technically, Katakuri got up before Luffy in their final clash, but then he collapsed again, so I'm not sure if that's worth much. Honestly, yeah, = just makes things simpler and causes us less headaches. Let's go with that.
 
Katakuri matched his 3x accelerated punch with a casual kick. He's definitely over snakeman.
I agree, but having them be = or having Katakuri >= Snakeman is still an upgrade over what we currently have on the profiles in my book, so I don't mind it as much I suppose.
 
Yeah so I guess, depending on what's decided for how Katakuri scales to Snakeman he could still potentially qualify for baseline High 7-A (although probably not since Boundman will likely go down).

At the very least Luffy's need some mention on his profile that makes the distinction that Boundman, Snakeman and Tankman aren't all equals and as such don't all scale to Boundman's rating.
 
@XDragnoir If anything, I might have to make a thread where it has to be a controlled discussion with a handful of individuals to discuss scaling and why each character is x tier... This Zoro thing alone is pretty ridiculous (I didn't see who agreed to H7A durability either. Sus).
 
Random thought, but if being off guard does not lower your durability then Apoo needs H7A Devil Fruit for cutting an off guard Zoro, no? Since Zoro has H7A dura now.
 
Damage said he doesn't necessarily need to be that strong to damage Zoro.
Just like how Zoro doesn't need to jump half of an entire tier to be strong enough to momentarily incapacitate a distracted opponent with one strike--especially when this is currently a one-time occurrence
 
incapacitate a distracted opponent with one strike--especially when this is currently a one-time occurrence
pretty sure a conclusion that was came to was that being distracted/being off guard =/= durability magically lowering (the only time this would be the case is if say Luffy was blocking with haki but got distracted and was hit while his haki wasn't being used; this isn't the case here).
 
Damage said he doesn't necessarily need to be that strong to damage Zoro.

High 7-A: Large Mountain level​

Characters who can destroy a large mountain, or those who can easily harm characters with large mountain level durability.

Going by the tiering system page, Apoo should have H7A AP for easily harming Zoro who has H7A dura
 
And yet Zoro was given High 7-A for being significantly superior to Apoo...

I'm starting to think that both characters should just be put back down to 7-A+ in light of the newest chapter.
 
I would like to cover Apoo and why he was indeed one hit KO'd:
- in chapter 997 After Zoro cut him he's fallen to the ground with X Drake standing over him, X Drake was quite literally standing directly over Apoo after he got hit and his reaction (and his reaction in 998) seem to imply that Apoo was indeed knocked out.


- in 997 we also see the other beast pirates treat the attack dealt to Apoo as if he was defeated & in 998 we visibly see Apoo get up and is trembling.


- Apoo getting up is treated as a stamina feat on the wiki, specifically recovery time & this doesn't negate the current scaling because he recovered.

To assume Apoo wasn't Knocked out would be to assume Drake either couldn't tell Apoo wasn't knocked out or simply didn't care & also assumes Apoo just stayed on the ground for several pages for no reason.
 
Random thought, but if being off guard does not lower your durability then Apoo needs H7A Devil Fruit for cutting an off guard Zoro, no? Since Zoro has H7A dura now.
Why in the world would Zoro have H7A durability?

Edit: And I don't understand why nobody is comprehending this.

Zoro is not High 7-A for cutting Apoo.

Zoro is almost High 7-A for cutting through Apoo AND HIS WEAPON with one sword, and him with his full arsenal is High 7-A.

All I see is complaints about upscaling, but nobody's reading the conversation and keeps trying to put Zoro on Usopp level
 
Last edited:
AND HIS WEAPON
I know this will be brought up so I may as well cover this:
Zoro >>> Apoo's Tonfa
  • Said Tonfa's could endure the strikes from Zoan X Drake, so said Tonfa's have 7-A+ durability.
  • previously non-serious Zoro striked at the tonfa's with haki and there's an effect used which could be confused for breaking them; this effect has been used in the past by Oda at times where breaking something didn't occur (such as on character's faces, it is merely an impact effect)
  • the place where Zoro strikes previously wasn't the same place he cut the tonfa with his ittoryu.
 
So what are the conclusions so far here?
 
So what are the conclusions so far here?
Wano scaling will be put on hold (Scabbards & Calamities)

Zoro, Apoo, Drake & Kid scaling has been applied although requires their justifications updating & maybe Apoo's AP rating could get listed higher.

Potentially Luffy's Gear Fourth Forms may alter; boundman will scale 3 times from base rather than gear third & Snakeman will not scale to Boundman.

Katakuri may potentially scale to baseline High 7-A though he may not due to Luffy's G4 ratings being altered.

There's the possible ratings still to be discussed from what I can tell. (Although like with Kat they may stay the same due to Boundman being lower in the High 7-A range)

@KingTempest did propose on discussing scaling for the admirals a few times in the thread but I don't see it in the original post. Personally I feel if admiral scaling would get revised it would be done in its own thread.
 
I appreciate the summary Emit.

@KingTempest did propose on discussing scaling for the admirals a few times in the thread but I don't see it in the original post. Personally I feel if admiral scaling would get revised it would be done in its own thread.
Sorry I didn't emphasize it enough

Some scale off the Admirals who were decided in this thread to be High 7-A or High 7-A+.
All we had for the Admirals is this calc for Aokiji.

Damage had the High 7-A, possibly 6-C for the Admirals, but we need a solid basis on it as well. Any numbers or calcs or anything will be appreciated.
 
I still disagree with the vast majority of the proposed changes--including the ones that have been applied.

But these guys can do as they want, I'll fix it later. Lack of patience led to the entire verse scaling to be butchered entirely based on mostly opinionated changes to stats (Not Zoro's, but we'll get to that later).
 
I'm in agreement that we probably did rush into things here, and I'm partially to blame for how that turned out.
 
I changed it to Mountain+. Apoo has 7-A+ AP for harming Luffy. Zoro getting High 7-A Dura for taking that doesn't make sense.

Also, Usopp is stated by Oda in the "10th Anniversary One Piece: Treasures" interview to be the weakest strawhat. Would that correlate to their dura?
 
@KingTempest - For Usopp, considering 10th Treasures was back in 2007, I believe this would only impact his pre time-skip (all the way back in Enies Lobby), and the profiles currently support this idea since he's only got scaling from "Shouldn't be weaker than Nami", which might need to be changed if there is info contradicting this.

It would only apply to AP i believe.

Unless you're referring to something more recent. If so, I can't find any info on it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top