- 31,399
- 27,689
Here you go if you actually want to read up and educate yourself before you keep showing your ignorance about the Jojoverse and how MiH works
K, still going to keep my vote for the Pucci thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here you go if you actually want to read up and educate yourself before you keep showing your ignorance about the Jojoverse and how MiH works
I mean I want the Pucci thread too because seeing as you have no ground for your argument making it ultimately futile because you won't be able to prove your case in the debate. I do indeed look forward to crossing paths with you once again bruv.K, still going to keep my vote for the Pucci thread.
Simmer down before you get bulliI mean I want the Pucci thread too because seeing as you have no ground for your argument making it ultimately futile because you won't be able to prove your case in the debate. I do indeed look forward to crossing paths with you once again bruv.
No bulli pleaseSimmer down before you get bulli
What about the bullies from "please stop bullying me nagatoro?"No bulli please
There will be bulliNo bulli please
Bullying is bullying so please don'tWhat about the bullies from "please stop bullying me nagatoro?"
There will be bulli
I think this is the first time ive ever seen Damage have this much funCorrection
Why did you put it as unknown we KNOW he doesn’t scale to it lmao.So this has been concluded?
I'll remove the 3-A tier thenyou monsters
Unknown is what it always was before. Also, even when it was 3-A, we knew he didn't scale to it, it's separate from his High 6-A AP.Why did you put it as unknown we KNOW he doesn’t scale to it lmao.
His profile doesn't have him scaling to itWhy did you put it as unknown we KNOW he doesn’t scale to it lmao.
I was just joking.Unknown is what it always was before. Also, even when it was 3-A, we knew he didn't scale to it, it's separate from his High 6-A AP.
Yeah being stubborn like this isn't exactly befitting of a administrator Damage. It's basically "well I know your right but I'm still gonna disagree just because I want a downgrade."K, still going to keep my vote for the Pucci thread.
Excuse me? When did I acknowledge that I thought the other person was right?Yeah being stubborn like this isn't exactly befitting of a administrator Damage. It's basically "well I know your right but I'm still gonna disagree just because I want a downgrade."
You scolded KingTempest for much lesser behavior, practice what you preach.
I'm sorry if I misread this, but I THINK what Damage was saying is that he'll save his actual vote until the actual thread, after he's made up his mind when all the evidence is presented, not necessarily that he'll disagree with it regardless. At least that's what I gathered.Yeah being stubborn like this isn't exactly befitting of a administrator Damage. It's basically "well I know your right but I'm still gonna disagree just because I want a downgrade."
You scolded KingTempest for much lesser behavior, practice what you preach.
Indeed, when all evidence & arguments are presented in that CRT then I'll be able to change my mind or not.I'm sorry if I misread this, but I THINK what Damage was saying is that he'll save his actual vote until the actual thread, after he's made up his mind when all the evidence is presented, not necessarily that he'll disagree with it regardless. At least that's what I gathered.
That seems like a bald-faced LIE because you don't even argue against the point presented to you as you clearly did when you said this after I posted my argument against the Pucci downgrade:Excuse me? When did I acknowledge that I thought the other person was right?
If I was convinced by their argument then I'd change my vote to agree with them, not blindly stick to whatever I had said before.
K, still going to keep my vote for the Pucci thread.
Indeed, when all evidence & arguments are presented in that CRT then I'll be able to change my mind or not.
That seems like a bald-faced LIE because you don't even argue against the point presented to you as you clearly did when you said this after I posted my argument against the Pucci downgrade:
lololololololMan **** that guy who brought up Pucci right ah ha ha
More whistling
Okay, closing it now.This is getting out of hand now, can someone please close this thread before all hell breaks loose? The changes were applied.
This is justifying unknown AP with something that's not AP. Characters don't get an unknown AP rating because of time reset hax. If there is some other justification to be used for this rating, we should use that instead, and remove this one.Unknown with Neo Eclipse (By merging the power of Fairy Heart and the Space Between Time, Zeref was going to reset time back at least 400 years and relive his life[3], which was going to destroy the present world and create a new one[4])
since it causes unneeded confusion. Simply mentioning "Neo Eclipse has the power to reset time back at least 400 years and allow Zeref to relive his life" already includes the effects of the hax.
@DemonGodMitchAubin, a couple of things:
The AP justification says this
This is justifying unknown AP with something that's not AP. Characters don't get an unknown AP rating because of time reset hax. If there is some other justification to be used for this rating, we should use that instead, and remove this one.
And as I suggested in the OP, we should also remove the part in the P&A section where it says:
since it causes unneeded confusion. Simply mentioning "Neo Eclipse has the power to reset time back at least 400 years and allow Zeref to relive his life" already includes the effects of the hax.