Excellence616
He/Him- 6,285
- 4,535
I agree with this
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Fairy Tail: Neo Eclipse, Two Years Later
- Thread starter CloverDragon03
- Start date
- Status
- 13,587
- 5,754
Read the blog and thread or …? Nah, I know it’s Low 2-C. Other stances are wrong
- 1,070
- 503
It ain't a terrible idea
- 9,390
- 6,692
Put me down for low 2-C. It’s genuinely a 4-D feat.
- 21,508
- 30,846
I can work with this
TheForgottenKing
He/Him- 494
- 238
This makes the most sense to me so I agree
- 9,390
- 6,692
- 13,490
- 21,647
- Thread starter
- #133
This is pretty much also why I strongly believe in Low 2-C the most
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,158
- 6,165
As far as the current standards are concerned, if it is not the entire timeline, it is High 3A. There was like a year debate on it.
- 9,390
- 6,692
And where has that been applied on our standard? Because there’s nothing of that sort anywhere on the tiering system.
Do you know what’s on our tiering system? A definition and affecting a section of a timeline fits that definition perfectly. So unless you pull out a note of this as an exception to what is defined by our High 3-A/Low 2-C page or even a note on our tiering system stating it’s High 3-A. I’d gladly oblige.
A year long debate with nothing officially added isn’t proof.
- 265
- 128
The reason why zeref low is 2c is that it destroys the universe and greatly affects spacetime.
- 13,490
- 21,647
- Thread starter
- #137
This standard doesn’t exist as far as I know. I’ve checked all the relevant pages and see nothing of the sort
Benimōru
He/Him- 468
- 406
- 9,390
- 6,692
Link where this quote is stated on our pages.
Benimōru
He/Him- 468
- 406
Last edited:
- 13,490
- 21,647
- Thread starter
- #142
Also, I’d like to emphasize another point in favor of Low 2-C. I’m on mobile so I can’t send over scans, but all the relevant scans are in the blog:
Zeref emphasizes twice that “this world will crumble away and a new one will take its place” and that “this world is over, and a new world is about to begin.” This indicates that he’s not just erasing 400 years, but rather, that he’s erasing the entire world and then creating a new one that goes up to 400 years in the past.
Because of this, Neo Eclipse would be Low 2-C
Zeref emphasizes twice that “this world will crumble away and a new one will take its place” and that “this world is over, and a new world is about to begin.” This indicates that he’s not just erasing 400 years, but rather, that he’s erasing the entire world and then creating a new one that goes up to 400 years in the past.
Because of this, Neo Eclipse would be Low 2-C
- 32,835
- 38,116
Okay so lemme get this straight.
1. Zeref is nuking the old world (The current spacetime continuum) completely.
2. Zeref then creates a new world/spacetime continuum from scratch that covers the original world's past 400 years worth of events.
I get it right?
Assuming that the old world no longer exists in any scope and Zeref is making a brand new universe reaching upto those 400 years worth of events (A carbon copy kinda thing), I'd say Low 2-C is good to go.
1. Zeref is nuking the old world (The current spacetime continuum) completely.
2. Zeref then creates a new world/spacetime continuum from scratch that covers the original world's past 400 years worth of events.
I get it right?
Assuming that the old world no longer exists in any scope and Zeref is making a brand new universe reaching upto those 400 years worth of events (A carbon copy kinda thing), I'd say Low 2-C is good to go.
- 32,835
- 38,116
Then it'd be Low 2-C outright, since what you said here implies that the old spacetime just ceases to be and he's creating a brand new one lock-stock-and-barrel in its place, only this time it has shit upto 400 years in the past.
- 13,490
- 21,647
- Thread starter
- #146
Yes, this is basically what it is. You can also check the scans in the blog to see if you believe my explanation lines up with this
- 13,490
- 21,647
- Thread starter
- #147
I can do so once I get access to a PC
- 265
- 128
scans here if you want, you can throw it when you don't have access to the computer.
- 13,490
- 21,647
- Thread starter
- #149
Appreciate it. Yeah, Zeref repeats that his world will replace the old, destroyed one
- 10,658
- 12,586
This I can agree
But like others have mentioned, if Zeref is only destroying a section of the timeline, it wouldn't be Low 2-C
- 13,490
- 21,647
- Thread starter
- #151
I’ll update the blog to account for this when I can
With this info, do you agree to Low 2-C?
- 265
- 128
here you can access the scans that Zeref said would destroy the universe
- 10,658
- 12,586
- 13,490
- 21,647
- Thread starter
- #154
@LordGriffin1000 @Damage3245 @KingTempest
What do you think of this info? Does this qualify for Low 2-C?
- 9,390
- 6,692
Because destroying 400 years worth of space is a 4-D feat hence L2-C. This is the equivalent of telling me why destroying a 5-D object doesn’t grant you 5-D AP or destroying a 6-D object doesn’t grant you 6-D AP. Destroying an uncountably infinite area > destroying a countably infinite area. Destroying something across time = destroying an uncountably infinite space. Tier 2 simply deals with all things 4-D.
- 13,490
- 21,647
- Thread starter
- #156
- 9,390
- 6,692
maybe I didn’t see the rest and just replied to what I was tagged to 
- 265
- 128
Are you talking about the profile update?
- 13,490
- 21,647
- Thread starter
- #160
I just mean the argument that Zeref is actually destroying the whole timeline, not just part of it
- Status
Similar threads
