- 31,399
- 27,689
I think there's a bit of a misconception here; less panels is generally good because with each increasing step in the process you're adding another factor for potential inaccuracy. So less steps mean less risk. But that doesn't prevent you getting inaccurate results if the foundation of your scaling is using the wrong basis, or it produces an outlier result.just calc sizes that uses the least highlighted panels... those will be the most accurate calcs