Coolboy6
He/Him- 7,434
- 5,993
I have no idea and I don’t know where they got that logic fromAnd exactly how do you even generate hype via "seperated by space and time " or "a place between space times".?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have no idea and I don’t know where they got that logic fromAnd exactly how do you even generate hype via "seperated by space and time " or "a place between space times".?
Can somebody provide an embedded video displaying this preview (similarly to some posts above this) please? I was commenting in general based on AKM's arguments. As I said, I haven't followed this discussion in-depth.I agree, now prove that preview specifically is used to hype stuff up, you can hype stuff up and be literal and serious. In fact, most of db preview either tells us what's going to happen, or what's happening, and when it generates hype, it's either literal or vague enough to not break the main plot points if the story. It's your turn, to prove this preview is hyperbole. If you can't, then the evidence will be, and stay valid.
That can be upto debate...
What shouldn't be up for debate however is this...
How on earth can this straightforward sentence be mistaken for a hyperbole??
Yeah you're right it's when Goku was training in heavenWhat event is this referring to exactly? When Goku was training in heaven in preparation for fighting Vegeta and Nappa? If so, I suppose that seems reliable, but it depends on what AKM thinks.
Yes. After fight with Raditz. When Goku dies and goes to Heaven while Piccolo trains a 4 year old Gohan.What event is this referring to exactly? When Goku was training in heaven in preparation for fighting Vegeta and Nappa? If so, I suppose that seems reliable, but it depends on what AKM thinks.
ahemwhy would he give that quote to generate hype, when the quote is just informative.
Thats a false equivalence ngl.
This. + the GT statement.Thats a false equivalence ngl.
A statement about cosmology has no implicit meaning than what it says.
While in case of statement above...not only is Frieza power lvl more susceptible to featless outlier rather as hype, but the statement by itself is also straightforward
Unless I’m missing something this shouldn’t matter right. Cause this is anime-only.how does the original Japanese compare to the manga version?
Multiple, clear as day statements you mean?Besides, I don't feel big upgrades like this should hinge on singular, debatable statements like this one.
Can you provide alternative interpretations?? Especially one that will take precedence over whats said and what it means literally??This is different, this is a statement in a preview that can be interpreted in different ways - how does the original Japanese compare to the manga version
Then debate and convince us its unusable...on what grounds must we consider it unreliable??Besides, I don't feel big upgrades like this should hinge on singular, debatable statements like this one.
Do keep in mind as this can been argued as working both ways.I don't see anything hyperbolic here.
"Poetic language" is an extraordinary claim for such a statement. And extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, which the opposition hasn't brought up yet.
Do keep in mind as this can been argued as working both ways.
If poetic language is being used and is being used in previews of a episode before it get started. In addition to that, what proof there is that it isn’t poetic language to say the least?
Thats a false equivalence ngl.
A statement about cosmology has no implicit meaning than what it says.
While in case of statement above...not only is Frieza power lvl more susceptible to featless outlier rather as hype, but the statement by itself is also straightforward
Reversing the burden of proof when the context of the statement and its very grammar doesn't give off any flower text. Even taking it as flower text....would it really matter?? Does its meaning change??Do keep in mind as this can been argued as working both ways.
If poetic language is being used and is being used in previews of a episode before it get started. In addition to that, what proof there is that it isn’t poetic language to say the least?
It does change and also, I not sure if it will count as false equivalent as both statement are from previews of a episode using a supposedly omniscient narrator. Even then, there is no guarantees this will pass anyway.Reversing the burden of proof when the context of the statement and its very grammar doesn't give off any flower text. Even takimg it as flower text....would it really matter?? Does its meaning change??
And what is said change??It does change
Yes it will.I not sure if it will count as false equivalent as both statement are from previews of a episode using a supposedly omniscient narrator
The GT anime statement in the OP.What's the original Japanese version?
Independent fan translation, accurate unless opposition has a better one.How can it be translated?
The GT manga? If it exists it isn't relevant here since it'll probably adapt the anime.If it's the same as the manga version it could (and perhaps should) be translated the same way, which throws out the basis of the statement entirely.
The OP is full of statements. Also it isn't even clear what statement you are even referring to.What was laid out for me was the one statement, which is debatable.
If I not mistaken, it is common knowledge that most if not all anime series usually tend to have previews of the next episode or from showing a preview being stated by the narrator to describe the plot/summary of the next IIRC.C) The grounds on which I differentiated this preview with others is not same as what you are using.
I used the context and basic grammar...you used a trend of the medium
Okaayyy...so??If I not mistaken, it is common knowledge that most if not all anime series usually tend to have previews of the next episode or from showing a preview being stated by the narrator to describe the plot/summary of the next IIRC.
Something I would like to point out.
Basically the previews are being treated as more like summaries of the next episodes and we might get a few clip of what the next episode has to offer.Okaayyy...so??
Well, in my case I simply don't have enough time to read remotely everything here, so I mostly read what has been posted by our staff in order to save time and be able to keep up with all of my work.Also why are the mods agreeing to refuted claims? Seems dumb to me.
The statement isn't in the manag, because the anime DBZ, and DBGT, are not canon to the manga, meaning using them is flat out objectively wrongWhat's the original Japanese version? How can it be translated? If it's the same as the manga version it could (and perhaps should) be translated the same way, which throws out the basis of the statement entirely.
What was laid out for me was the one statement, which is debatable.
Then why agree? Isn't best to actually understand and analysis the argument, Instead of blindly agreeing? What if the the staff were wrong? You will just blidnly agree? Into better to analysis the argument, before blindly saying "yes, I agree with staff"Well, in my case I simply don't have enough time to read remotely everything here, so I mostly read what has been posted by our staff in order to save time and be able to keep up with all of my work.
You can refer to this comment where I have explained what the proposal is and why I disagree: https://vsbattles.com/threads/db-toei-revision.127083/page-4#post-4301991Well, in my case I simply don't have enough time to read remotely everything here, so I mostly read what has been posted by our staff in order to save time and be able to keep up with all of my work.
Counter arguments are given for valid arguments. If the only thing you are providing is a preview, it doesn't even qualify as a valid evidence, so.If the only debunk is "previews" then I still agree with the OP, since I think the opposition has failed to give solid counter arguments
Thank you for that.
I debunked all those points.You can refer to this comment where I have explained what the proposal is and why I disagree: https://vsbattles.com/threads/db-toei-revision.127083/page-4#post-4301991
Now, I will ask, politely. What's wrong with a preview that gives us exposition and explains what's happening, especially when it's coming from a narrator?Counter arguments are given for valid arguments. If the only thing you are providing is a preview, it doesn't even qualify as a valid evidence, so.
Thank you for that.
it came from panwhen it's coming from a narrator
And that matters how??it came from pan