- 16,991
- 12,131
That's the point, it's not Power Null otherwise they'd be able to do exactly everything you just listed with Haki.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tama's fruit is the weakness to Zoans.
Different types/levels of power null.That's the point, it's not Power Null otherwise they'd be able to do exactly everything you just listed with Haki.
Most likely she would be able to if she can tame real animals and fake fake animalsI don’t think tama has ever tamed a real zoan user.
Different types/levels of power null.
Which is why I mentioned that in context, Rayleigh is talking about bypassing certain Devil Fruits defensives (Logia intangibility being chief on the list). Not that he is talking about negating or nullifying all Devil Fruit abilities.
All because Rayleigh spoke about Logias doesn't mean that it's the only thing resisted.
This Haki as a dura enhancing forcefield needs to go.I think resistance is the wrong word (and that wasn't what I was asserting anyway. I never said it only affects Logias).
Haki, as a durability-enhancing forcefield, is going to let you withstand more than you would without it. But we don't grant forcefields specific "resistances" for every type of ability they've been shown to work against.
I meant to say nullified.What are the other Paramecia abilities being resisted against?
So why is regular Haki, which has never shown a forcefield or barrier to the same extent that we see in Wano, being used as the counter?
as a durability-enhancing forcefield, is going to let you withstand more than you would without it. But we don't grant forcefields specific "resistances" for every type of ability they've been shown to work against.
The fact that Hyo refers to that one as "an invisible armor" and Rayleigh refers to his own as "an invisible armor" while seeing the aura around both pre and post timeskip, while hardening Buso is clearly not invisible says otherwise.Both versions are a "forcefield". The one we see demonstrated repeatedly in Wano is just the forcefield being extended out further than the user's own body/weapon.
Obviously not every single one (Brook's fruit, how do you resist that? Same with Zoans and others), but the ones where it makes sense (I have better haki than you, this won't work). Simple.I think it's a way bigger stretch to say that Haki users have resistance to every DF ability.
Notice this lineThe reason why Luffy shouldn't get resistance to poison from the Shinokuni feat isn't because the poison touched him and he was unaffected, it's because it couldn't touch him through the Haki covering him.
We're not giving Luffy the Shinokuni resistance, we're giving it to the Haki. The shinokuni penetrates the body of the person and gets in their system. It didn't even penetrate His Haki, it just fell off.The reason why Luffy shouldn't get resistance to poison from the Shinokuni feat isn't because the poison touched him and he was unaffected, it's because it couldn't touch him through the Haki covering him.
This regular haki is not a forcefield, that should have never been applied. Haki is armor, yes, but saying it's a forcefield is just completely blocking how it works. It's an enhancer. When people make black blades, are they putting permanent forcefields around weapons? Did Vergo hit Smoker and Law with a forcefield around his Bamboo stick? No.It's no different than if a forcefield user put up a barrier between them and the poison gas. We don't give "Resistance to Poison" for feats like that.
These are my views on the "invisible armor". It's for the advanced.The fact that Hyo refers to that one as "an invisible armor" and Rayleigh refers to his own as "an invisible armor" while seeing the aura around both pre and post timeskip, while hardening Buso is clearly not invisible says otherwise.
Because Rayleigh says that Haki is the perfect counter to devil fruit abilities, yet we're giving it to only Logias and Body Changing Paramecias.I don't see how this is picking out what's convenient.
Because Rayleigh says that Haki is the perfect counter to devil fruit abilities, yet we're giving it to only Logias and Body Changing Paramecias.
It's stated to be that because it enhances dura and AP, it does not put a barrier around it unless it's advanced.
That's not what he says at all.
Damage.I don't agree with your interpretation here. I have no issues with Haki being treated as a forcefield. I don't know why you'd assume that poisonous gas could permeate Haki in the first place.
I don't know how you can get this to mean that there is zero forcefield usage involved here. Luffy is saying that Cracker's Haki is harder than anyone elses he's faced before. How does this mean "Cracker isn't using a forcefield"?
Gomu Gomu is inversely immune to physical attacks, Haki stops it.
Supa Supa is inversely immune to physical attacks, Haki stops it.
Tori Tori no Mi, Model: Phoenix regenerates from attacks, Haki stops it.
Ope Ope cuts through people via spacial manip and durability negation, Haki stops it.
People hypothesized that Doflamingo's resistances to heat and cold are from the Haki. That is not confirmed, and I am begging that this sentence doesn't get picked out of everything I just said so people can say "prove it".
Haki is the counter to devil fruits. This is not my statement, this is Rayleigh's. If it's an attack, it resists. If it's a resistance, it negates it. That is the point.
We don't need to be overly cautious. If we get something different in the future, oh well, we can change it.
I would be fine with such additions.So what if we update the Armamament Haki part of the page to put it as "Limited Power Nullification (Can negate certain Devil Fruit abilities, giving Limited Elemental Intangibility Negation, and possibly resistance to certain Devil Fruit powers such Law's spatial manipulation, etc)".
That was mentioned by Zoro, then he used Haki and broke through.I don't think we accept that he's actually immune to physical attacks. His body is only made out of steel swords after all. It's possible that just being strong enough is enough to cut through it (strong enough to cut through steel as I think it is mentioned in the series).
Idk if you can apply Haki to Danmaku, that's a waste of Haki.I don't think there's any major counter-arguments to this. Only, doesn't Kizaru shoot him with a bunch of lasers and fail to permanently damage him? Unless Kizaru just wasn't using Haki on his lasers because he can't or just didn't for some reason.
A statement byThis one is only a possibility in my view right now. We don't have undeniable instances of feats for it. Only non-proven statements so far.
The context of his speech is that "hey, this is something called Armament Haki. I'm going to teach you how to use it in the future. Look at this, now let me explain more".Haki is the counter to certain Devil Fruit defenses, without needing to rely on user those Devil Fruits specific weaknesses. That is what I believe from Rayleigh's words and the context of his speech.
You say we're being overly cautious, I say you're being overly speculative by saying that Haki gives users resistance to every single offensive Devil Fruit ability in the verse.
Obviously not every single one (Brook's fruit, how do you resist that? Same with Zoans and others), but the ones where it makes sense (I have better haki than you, this won't work). Simple.
I vehemently disagree with it being power null, we have direct statements from the Manga outright saying Haki doesn't negate Devil Fruit powers.
Limited Power Nullification
If we decide on power nullification, alright, just don't make it specific to DF abilities.
I changed my mind a bit, they do flat out say that Haki doesn’t negate the abilities, so I can’t really agree with Power Null
Extras
We should remove Non-Physical Interaction and replace it with Elemental Intangibility Negation, since we see that Non-Physical Interaction via Buso doesn't work on Prometheus.
I’m guessing you don’t give specific resistances for characters that use it because generally the durability of their body is not in in use, just the durability of the forcefield.
But using your own words, it is a durability-enhacing forcefield, which means the users durability is in use, this means that resistances should applied.
A statement by
B. Doflamingo, who has studied the Ope Ope no Mi (from the statement WE KNOW ALL ABOUT YOUR POWERS, also his knowledge gathering on it), superior to Vergo (someone with incredible Haki), yea I'm almost 1000% sure that Doflamingo is a beautiful source for this. Doflamingo's statement shouldn't need extre proof since he researched the fruit.
This Wiki currently doesn't accept immunities for those two characters, but I always liked this argument.Read through most of the thread I agree with most of the proposals I just have a few questions/slight problems
Luffy and daz bones should be resistant or even highly resistant to blunt force attacks/cutting attacks not immune. Luffy was beat up in the bar by bellamy garp damaged him (although you can argue oda didnt have black haki in mind yet) and I thought the haki zoro used in the fight was observation vs to dodge the rocks not aramament to cut him
The issue is that Marco is not a Logia, he is a Mythical Zoan who has the ability to rapidly heal himself. He healed through Danmaku lasers.Marco wearing bandages post fight is just showing he was injured in battle. Are all logias free of injuries at the end of their fights?
It negs spacial manip offensive attacks, not spacial manipulation in general. Law and Haki users can still get teleported, but an attack that is offensive (nothing defensive) wouldn't work on them.If stronger haki negs spatial manip are we saying characters with stronger haki then law would be immune to shambles?
@KingTempestSo? Am wrong or not? You say it enhances the user’s durability but you are proposing it is a forcefield of some kind that protects the user.
Why would it enhance the durability of the user if you think this forcefield is protecting the user?
I've already countered the Forcefield portion and I said we should get rid of it.@KingTempest
Since nobody is answering me, is my argument senseless? It is being called A “Durability-enhancing forcefield” but forcefields rely on their built-in durability not the users correct? (That would be the reason why resistances are not added for forcefield users). Saying it is a invisible shield that increases the durability of the user itself makes no sense! It’s like saying a steel armor is making person using it durable instead of the armor itself being durable and protecting the user?
Am i not getting something?