• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Articles clean-up reports (New forum)

It is an improvement, but we still do not know if the monster that he scales from has as much energy in its fire breath as in its physical strikes, and also do not have any calculation for its physical power in the first place.
I already asked someone to calc the feat.

So we have to wait for it
 
Many of the Disney characters are from other properties, since Disney just adapted them, so they should all have (Disney) at the end of their page titles.
 
Apex:

Okay. Thanks.

@Carioca:

Agreed. However, somebody would have to be willing to update all of the pages that link to them after the renaming has taken place.

Are there any staff volunteers who are willing to handle this?
 

The profile is locked and there's an error in his weaknesses section:

"When using medallion, its user need to be suficiente powerful to wield it"

A spanish word. Should be changed to "powerful enough"

Also, a misspelling in the attack/techniques section, Soul Distribution, in the third paragraph:

"Yhwach ultimatly re fined the process of sharing his spirit with others"

Should be obviously changed to "ultimately refined"
 
Thanks Ant, my english is not perfect, so I didn't consider that it could also be "sufficiently poweful"

But the other text still says "ultimatly", is that actually well spelled in the context being used?
 
Last edited:
I am uncertain if Post-Crisis or Post-Flashpoint is correct. Can others investigate further please?
 
On the Calculations page, the "Destruction/Creation of Planets and Planetoids" section reads:
"For feats that involve the Destruction or the creation of planets or planetoids, we use a term called Gravitational Binding Energy, more information about the subject on the GBE [[[Gravitational Binding Energy|page]]."
The source code for the GBE part should probably be fixed.
 
I guess if no one is willing to clean up the pages can be deleted, in lack of better options.
 
No problem.
 

Poor to no justification for just about everything on the profile. No calcs, links to feats, or even use of common reference feats to justify the AP or durability.
 
Seems like the user who posted it had worked a while to the profile. Maybe a message on his wall and ask him to correct it. If not let's say a few days of no change then delete it?
 
Last edited:
My apologies, but the page was far too unreliable to keep in the wiki, and take any risks with, so I deleted it.
 
You can always later find the source code or save it in one of your sandboxes for when somebody asks for it. It's just better to tell the user to work on the profile in their sandbox before posting it.
 
Yes. Agreed.
 
I have no problem with it being deleted but I wanted to give the user a chance to correct it before deleting as it seemed he/she worked a while on it. Yeah, I agree that it should be worked first in a blog/sandbox.
 
Well, he/she can ask for the source code later if necessary.
 
Nearly a week has passed since then and there has been no replies whatsoever.
I guess the source code of the pages could be pasted into a sandbox, then the profiles can be deleted, to avoid issues with the knowledgeable members if they decide to help at some point, as this doesn't seem to be the case currently.
 
Last edited:
After being multiple times pinged and being active on the wiki but ignoring it. I think they just plain don't care and I agree it should be deleted.
 
Okay. Can somebody remind me about the problems with those profile pages first please?
 
Okay. I suppose that the verse and its pages can probably be deleted then.
 
Just wanted to bring up that this page is locked and one of the users is a page that was deleted. Was hoping if it could be removed.
 
Is somebody willing to handle deleting them please?
 
Back
Top