• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Profile Deletion Requests Thread (New forum)

Bro survived the scorched earth operation 😭🙏🏻
 
Bro survived the scorched earth operation 😭🙏🏻
Nuh-uh
 
 
Posting here to get a second opinion.

The newly-posted Jason Voorhees profile seems like it might deserve deletion. None of the abilities are explained or given scans, despite them including some pretty powerful/variable stuff (soul manip, madness manip, resurrection, six different types of immortality).

I'll ask the creator about it, so they may resolve this, but if not, should it go?
 
Posting here to get a second opinion.

The newly-posted Jason Voorhees profile seems like it might deserve deletion. None of the abilities are explained or given scans, despite them including some pretty powerful/variable stuff (soul manip, madness manip, resurrection, six different types of immortality).

I'll ask the creator about it, so they may resolve this, but if not, should it go?
No justifications for abilities; no calculations to support the AP, speed or LS; the severe lack of scans and references as well. I see no reason to keep a profile like that.
 
Posting here to get a second opinion.

The newly-posted Jason Voorhees profile seems like it might deserve deletion. None of the abilities are explained or given scans, despite them including some pretty powerful/variable stuff (soul manip, madness manip, resurrection, six different types of immortality).

I'll ask the creator about it, so they may resolve this, but if not, should it go?
Looks like a new profiles, you can just move it to users sandbox for the user to work on it.
 
Suggesting Block Tales for deletion.

Relatively new pages (all in the last few weeks), zero calculations to support statistics despite them going outside of human bounds, zero references, and only a single scan, on the page for Tutorial Terry, which seems like a game mechanic rather than legitimate Type 5 Immortality.

EDIT: The verse's sole editor has responded, saying that they will attempt to add calculations, but that they find doing so very annoying. They've started adding some scans, and changing some ratings.
 
Last edited:

Already shows itself.
 

Already shows itself.
Nuked it
 
It was recreated.
Gave them instructions.
Screenshot_2025-01-13-20-58-13-89_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg
 

Self-Explanatory. Should be a blog post
 
Stats are all unknown.

 
Remember what I did to Warcraft?
Do it again.

These profiles are ancient and incredibly crappy and outdated, any CRT for the verse's scaling dies in days, and I'm gonna be working on it, with hopefully more than sheer will and a headbutting contest like it was with most of WoW.
 
Remember what I did to Warcraft?
Do it again.

These profiles are ancient and incredibly crappy and outdated, any CRT for the verse's scaling dies in days, and I'm gonna be working on it, with hopefully more than sheer will and a headbutting contest like it was with most of WoW.
I agree with them being deleted too, some profile are as horrible as my day went today. But then again it's a whole verse so let's get 2 or 3 staff input ig. 🤷
 
I doubt this is valid?
From what I understand a major point is that we don't know what is or isn't real in the book, which doesn't seem good for a vs page
 
I doubt this is valid?
From what I understand a major point is that we don't know what is or isn't real in the book, which doesn't seem good for a vs page
That same plot point exists in the movie.
 
Stats are all unknown.

ehh, I mean if it is a spirit then all that matters is the abilities, no? Not everything can have stats
 
I doubt this is valid?
From what I understand a major point is that we don't know what is or isn't real in the book, which doesn't seem good for a vs page
I think that sort of thing is fine, as long as a note is left about it. If the real-ness is vague, resulting in either an ordinary human lying/being delusional, or a stat-filled page, go for the stat-filled page and leave a note. At least, that's what I did with Makoto Muraki.

Incomplete
Deleted.
Stats are all unknown.

Has notable abilities, it can stay.
 
Well it doesn't have much and also doesn't fit to be a profile either.
 
Yeah I've posted above about deleting the whole verse. No-one responded.
Suggesting Block Tales for deletion.

Relatively new pages (all in the last few weeks), zero calculations to support statistics despite them going outside of human bounds, zero references, and only a single scan, on the page for Tutorial Terry, which seems like a game mechanic rather than legitimate Type 5 Immortality.

EDIT: The verse's sole editor has responded, saying that they will attempt to add calculations, but that they find doing so very annoying. They've started adding some scans, and changing some ratings.
 
Yeah I've posted above about deleting the whole verse. No-one responded.
They are all quite similar in nature, lacking any scans or references, except for the player's profile, which I still feel doesn't quite fit. If the creator of these profiles isn't willing to add the details, then I'm up for deleting the entire verse.
 
Yeah I've posted above about deleting the whole verse. No-one responded.
I saw the creator deleted his comments for some reason. I'd be willing to support a deletion, and he can republish once he gets his shit such as calculations sorted together.
 
If no-one else gets around to it, I'll move 'em to a sandbox and leave some instructions later today.
 
Needs to be deleted and moved to user's sandbox
 
Remember what I did to Warcraft?
Do it again.

These profiles are ancient and incredibly crappy and outdated, any CRT for the verse's scaling dies in days, and I'm gonna be working on it, with hopefully more than sheer will and a headbutting contest like it was with most of WoW.
Bump
 
Remember what I did to Warcraft?
Do it again.

These profiles are ancient and incredibly crappy and outdated, any CRT for the verse's scaling dies in days, and I'm gonna be working on it, with hopefully more than sheer will and a headbutting contest like it was with most of WoW.
Considering that there are a lot of outdated calculations that have either been or desperate need of recalculation. And power scaling standards for various weapons and vehicles/ship may be off due to its military themed setting. I also think nuking the verse and rebuilding from scratch may be in best interest; especially with how abysmal the speed scaling is. And some other upcoming debates on Psionic powers qualifying for our UES standards also need work. There is information and scans throughout some pages here in there with helpful information. So as long as there are backed up source codes saved on either sandboxes or blog posts, I don't mind the deletion.
 
Considering that there are a lot of outdated calculations that have either been or desperate need of recalculation. And power scaling standards for various weapons and vehicles/ship may be off due to its military themed setting. I also think nuking the verse and rebuilding from scratch may be in best interest; especially with how abysmal the speed scaling is. And some other upcoming debates on Psionic powers qualifying for our UES standards also need work. There is information and scans throughout some pages here in there with helpful information. So as long as there are backed up source codes saved on either sandboxes or blog posts, I don't mind the deletion.
If you want I can shoot you a link to the discord I'm going to be using to get the ball rolling when I feel like getting the mandatory profiles like Jim done.

Also the scans don't really matter, since they don't have references. I need to be able to track down where the **** my scans came from.
 
Self-explanatory
 
Stats are all unknown.

The profile's wording is just terrible and almost every single ability and stat listed has a grammar or spelling mistake, so I fixed it. I dunno if it can get deleted because all the stats are unknown.
 
The profile's wording is just terrible and almost every single ability and stat listed has a grammar or spelling mistake, so I fixed it. I dunno if it can get deleted because all the stats are unknown.
Seems pretty new was even made this week in fact, if the person who made it is willing to work on it and try and get feats listed while adding references I'd say it could work since at least all the P&A does have justifications and scans. It does even at a glance look like they have feats that can be used its just a matter of adding them
 
Self-explanatory
Also these profiles should probably be moved to a sandbox since they're incomplete
 
Last edited:
I think this should belong here, the first "feat" in the ap section is pretty explicit (nudity and sexual content) and I think it may go against VSBW/Fandom rules. Though, it's debatable due to angles of the scene and such.
 
I think this should belong here, the first "feat" in the ap section is pretty explicit (nudity and sexual content) and I think it may go against VSBW/Fandom rules. Though, it's debatable due to angles of the scene and such.
I'm pretty sure we allow things like this if they're feats.
 
I think this should belong here, the first "feat" in the ap section is pretty explicit (nudity and sexual content) and I think it may go against VSBW/Fandom rules. Though, it's debatable due to angles of the scene and such.
Looking at this again, I don't really think it's really appropriate for it to be listed and should be removed
 
I think this should belong here, the first "feat" in the ap section is pretty explicit (nudity and sexual content) and I think it may go against VSBW/Fandom rules. Though, it's debatable due to angles of the scene and such.
Ok. No wtf did i just watched.
I'm pretty sure we allow things like this if they're feats.
I am not so sure but feat itself kinda too explicit.
Looking at this again, I don't really think it's really appropriate for it to be listed and should be removed
We got redo of healer here
 
Back
Top