• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

About Yang vs Inasa and determining if it's a stomp

@Miles Yang cant rapid fire he gauntlets though? Again, she needs to throw a punch to shoot, theyre not fully automatic weapons
 
WeeklyBattles said:
Unfortunately it is, or WAS (a stomp), seeing as given a lot of what was said here a TON of arguments in Inasa's favor are apparently inaccurate
Nope, they're just straight up inaccurate. Also nice concession. Can we unlock the thread now?
 
WeeklyBattles said:
@Miles Yang cant rapid fire he gauntlets though? Again, she needs to throw a punch to shoot, theyre not fully automatic weapons
Right, they're semi-auto. Or if you wanna clown even harder, they're PUMP ACTION, but she's apparently fast enough to still rapid fire as shown here and here , and here is where she is another scene where she propels herself upwards https://youtu.be/OPjcCkMYYzY?t=137
 
Actually, we don't need to continue on; Weekly already conceded his arguments. Now, may I request an admin unlock the original thread?
 
Well, now I'll have to be scanning Yang's future matches for how people use Yang's Indefinite pseudo flight.
 
She doesn't really have indefinite pseudo flight, as she rarely ever spams it outside of getting closer to people to punch them. It's an ability she has and uses, but is limited by her lack of creativity.
 
That the two are two different words for what is effectively the same.

Pseudo-flight and the double jumping part of acrobatics both refer to the same abilitiy, as the ability page definition itself says.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
@Jinx You are aware that there is no rule against people changing their minds regarding who they think would win in a vs thread right?
And no, the BAtman vs Light example matches the Yang vs Inasa one perfectly as Yang can instakill with one punch but there is no scenario in which she would be abl to viably do so as her opponent dominates her in combat and he would not ever just sit there and allow her to do something that would kill him.
Of course i am. But its strange its always you the second the non-RWBY character starts winning beyond your arguments, and its always not a vote change and instead a stomp, even though the majority of people compared to you (usually also the ones that have their own arguments rather than a handy FRA) would disagree.

Really doesnt, because Yang doesn't need to know anyones actual hidden identity in order to instakill. All she has to do is land a good punch like she has done with both melee and ranged fighters. There is a viable way, as we have seen Yang can legitimately charge through attacks like Flynt's Killer Quartet (Which isn't wind manipulation, but the fundamental of the attack despite it being sound manipulation is to provide an opposing force much like wind manip, so is therefore moot), allow herself to control height and jump extremely high in order to at least reach Inasa, though he can still counter it. Countering abilities =/= Being unfair unless this was literally Yangs only thing. This was what you were arguing yourself but now you suddenly have to go back on the world
 
Back
Top