- 61,134
- 14,497
@Miles Yang cant rapid fire he gauntlets though? Again, she needs to throw a punch to shoot, theyre not fully automatic weapons
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope, they're just straight up inaccurate. Also nice concession. Can we unlock the thread now?WeeklyBattles said:Unfortunately it is, or WAS (a stomp), seeing as given a lot of what was said here a TON of arguments in Inasa's favor are apparently inaccurate
Right, they're semi-auto. Or if you wanna clown even harder, they're PUMP ACTION, but she's apparently fast enough to still rapid fire as shown here and here , and here is where she is another scene where she propels herself upwards https://youtu.be/OPjcCkMYYzY?t=137WeeklyBattles said:@Miles Yang cant rapid fire he gauntlets though? Again, she needs to throw a punch to shoot, theyre not fully automatic weapons
Because this is an ability she is logically able to use, but doesn't due to the writers not implementing it. Also, most of her enemies are grounded, so there is no need.ElixirBlue said:So why label it (Flight) Pseudo Flight and not (Acrobatics) Mid-Air Jump?
Of course i am. But its strange its always you the second the non-RWBY character starts winning beyond your arguments, and its always not a vote change and instead a stomp, even though the majority of people compared to you (usually also the ones that have their own arguments rather than a handy FRA) would disagree.WeeklyBattles said:@Jinx You are aware that there is no rule against people changing their minds regarding who they think would win in a vs thread right?
And no, the BAtman vs Light example matches the Yang vs Inasa one perfectly as Yang can instakill with one punch but there is no scenario in which she would be abl to viably do so as her opponent dominates her in combat and he would not ever just sit there and allow her to do something that would kill him.