GarrixianXD
University Enthusiast
Any/AllVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,877
- 9,108
I have no issue with a ban of one year.What do other staff members here think?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have no issue with a ban of one year.What do other staff members here think?
oh that agree and disagree section is specifically about the point put immediately above said voting section, about the "Afterlife is said to be the cosmos, therefore it is a universe" scan, no one in the thread summarized the other arguments well enough, thus why i put "says that he agrees with it being universe sized, but has not commented on the up above scan" immediately after his vote in the section, as theReported @omegabronic for manipulating votes
I was reported for this before, where team members were getting the wrong things about my Op and I put them on neutral until they spoke again, but I didn't know I could and I got a warning about this, but Omega knows this and is still placing DDM as neutral, as he agreed in the other topic and in this recent one
And Omega is doing the same thing here
Right here, DDM agreed about the Universe being 2-C
Summing it all up, he is manipulating the votes to get where he wants and that is not allowed here, since I was reported for it, and even I didn't know why, but Omega clearly knows and still puts DDM as neutral, and he agrees with our points from the previous one.
he didn't agreed with the topic of the poll tho? that being the cosmos scan, after that concludes i will make another voting poll after waiting for him to explain his points better so that i am able to create oneStill, man, you can't just leave an admin who agreed neutral, that's vote manipulation, just put it as agreed instead of making excuses for your manipulation low scale.
i did included his vote tho@DarkDragonMedeus The report unfolds around you so i hope you could clarify which is the correct instance here before this goes overboard.
I will just point out that currently not including the staff vote even though the staff has made their position clear is vote manipulation and currently there have been warnings given to users for doing the same.
Honestly, what's wrong with that? A character that is conceptual should already be ae type1, this is already confirmed in crt, I will edit it because it is misspelled. This is not a rule violation.Quintessence made on the post above this one a request to change his AE type from 1 to 2 without any explanation on why, only that he
It seemed to me that you wanted to change the type only to fit the VS Thread, given that you essentually just said "Type 2 is wrong, please change to Type 1" without really explaining why.Honestly, what's wrong with that? A character that is conceptual should already be ae type1, this is already confirmed in crt, I will edit it because it is misspelled. This is not a rule violation.
I was not aware of this mistake until I saw people talking about it, and after I realized it I wanted to edit it and explained why I was going to edit it.It seemed to me that you wanted to change the type only to fit the VS Thread, given that you essentually just said "Type 2 is wrong, please change to Type 1" without really explaining why.
Well, i included the 2-C part to be more specific, i got that you agreed with keeping 2-C, i should have made that more clear in the voting section looking back nowI was neutral on the first thread because I was mostly unsure what extents the OP was proposing. But on the 2nd thread, I did make my stance clear that I agreed with using Toriyama's illustrations and that it was face value evidence that living universe was a parallel dimension existing next to the living universe and seperated by spatio-temporal barriers thus justifying 2-C. I don't think omegabronic has intentionally done anything wrong from my point of view, but may have forgotten or misunderstood what my hat would be put in. I was in neutral in the old thread. Though there was a glitch where I wasn't recieving notifications for the 2nd half of the thread, so I may have missed out if there was any wrong doings. But now that I sound more specific, might as well put me in the "Agree with keeping the 2-C ratings done by the initial SSG Goku and Beerus shaking the universe feat."
you were discussing whether they could interact or not, that's what I was talking about.
Does not matter, you'd need a CRT to buff to Type 1, something I didn't really find yet.you were discussing whether they could interact or not, that's what I was talking about.
characters that are conceptual must be ae1. No upgrade is needed for this.Does not matter, you'd need a CRT to buff to Type 1, something I didn't really find yet.
But yes, better to wait.
Literally the CRT agreed with Type 2 AE, you're doing this worse for yourself man.characters that are conceptual must be ae1. No upgrade is needed for this.
also this is probably the crt you need
Can you prove it?Literally the CRT agreed with Type 2 AE, you're doing this worse for yourself man.
You are saying that a conceptual character is not ae1, which is strange. I'll open it if that's what you need.@Quintessence_PE You can't push for an ability change like this without a CRT, that's just the rules
CTRL + F on "Type 1" only leads on concept type, not AE. @Elizhaa was even iffy on them being even Type 2 AE.Can you prove it?
I'm not saying anything about what it is and isn't, I'm just saying that these are the rulesYou are saying that a conceptual character is not ae1, which is strange. I'll open it if that's what you need.
Elizhaa disagree? Are you sure you read it right?I'd like to add that the AE 2 wasn't even accepted in said thread, Elizhaa disagreed, Planck was neutral, and DDM also disagreed, yet Quintessence added it anyway.
I do not want to bother with the rest of the verse's addition, but it may seem a pretty severe case of corruption.
Just being the concept of love is not really enough for type 2 since is not really a key component of reality without more contexts, like inanimate objects that cannot love, for example.Elizhaa disagree? Are you sure you read it right?
here s/he's talking about cm. (people who are already conceptual 1 are eligible to be ae1 because they are the concept itself).Just being the concept of love is not really enough for type 2 since is not really a key component of reality without more contexts, like inanimate objects that cannot love, for example.
I mean...
So there's no talk at all for AE? What.here s/he's talking about cm. (people who are already conceptual 1 are eligible to be ae1 because they are the concept itself).
The reason I add that is because it is a conceptual being because people who are conceptual are also ae 1.So there's no talk at all for AE? What.
There was probably some confusion and I will open a crt to fix it, don't worry.As said above, you have to make a CRT to add AE, you can't just add it because why not.
But I think I'm flooding this, so I'll stop.
Agreed.I know I'm not meant to be talking either due to not being staff or whatever, but y'all gotta quit spamming this thread.
Bump, still in the case of Omega, he hasn't put DDM in agreement and possibly won't even after i ask DDM about the other world being Universal sizedReported @omegabronic for manipulating votes
I was reported for this before, where team members were getting the wrong things about my Op and I put them on neutral until they spoke again, but I didn't know I could and I got a warning about this, but Omega knows this and is still placing DDM as neutral, as he agreed in the other topic and in this recent one
And Omega is doing the same thing here
Right here, DDM agreed about the Universe being 2-C
Summing it all up, he is manipulating the votes to get where he wants and that is not allowed here, since I was reported for it, and even I didn't know why, but Omega clearly knows and still puts DDM as neutral, and he agrees with our points from the previous one.
Bump, still in the case of Omega, he hasn't put DDM in agreement and possibly won't even after i ask DDM about the other world being Universal sized
Here where he voted to agree that the other world is the size of the Universe
Furthermore, he keeps creating other things to distort the votes so that they are not valid (before he created the crt there was no such thing and he is doing this on purpose)
In the other crt, the same thing also happened, where he was manipulating the votes so that people closed, while we were winning in votes
What is confirmed here too
What made the administrators close our crt, even though we were winning in votes
All of us Dragon Ball fans are upset by these things from Omega, and not for the second time, he always does these things to get what he wants.
He did put DDM as agree for 2-C and afterlife being universe sized. It's just weirdly done and put in neutral because of not commenting on the specific scan. There is no vote manipulation going on here.@DarkDragonMedeus(says that he agrees with it being universe sized and thus with it being 2-C
Neutral with Afterlife being a universe: @Maverick_Zero_X @DarkDragonMedeus(says that he agrees with it being universe sized and thus with it being 2-C, but has not commented on the up above scan)Read what's in the OP please.
He did put DDM as agree for 2-C and afterlife being universe sized. It's just weirdly done and put in neutral because of not commenting on the specific scan. There is no vote manipulation going on here.
(says that he agrees with it being universe sized and thus with it being 2-C, but has not commented on the up above scan)Neutral with Afterlife being a universe: @Maverick_Zero_X @DarkDragonMedeus
No dude, he's in neutral, he clearly agreed with another world being 2-C, Omega is twisting the crt so he can win in votes.