Heres the Issue im seeing unless im misunderstanding something here...
Arash has a B++ NP Ranking with a suicide shot. Bediever has an A rank NP. Gawain without his Numeral of the Saints has B+ level Strength. Though with Numeral of the Saints that is a 3x multiplier. He was able to casually bat away Bedievers NP with just a swing of his sword with NofTS active. |
Assuming what
Chariot said here is true . There is < a 20% Difference with each "+" Modifier in terms of AP (barring NP's of A++ or higher since they are considered special)
A > B
B+ > A
A+>B+
B++>A+
A++>B++
B+++>A++
[1]
Bediever had an A rank NP. gawain Swatted it away as if playing baseball was normal
Arash had to use his entire lifeforce, and life just to cancel out Rhon and his NP is only B++
There we have an inconsisency problem...
Gawains Numeral of the saints is a 3x times multiplier.. hes 3x stronger... Casually batting away an A rank NP would be a strength feat wouldn't it??
so wouldn't that make his strength stat B+(+++) Add the extra 3 in parathenses on there.. wouldn't that make him 50% stronger than that sucidie attack stella that cancelled out, and blocked a causual blast from Rhon that was meant to kill 5 servants???
I might have poorly explained this too... amd im sorry..
Overall my point is that this shows an inconsistency with Fergus Lilly. His Adult self has an A+ rank NP which is the same as Gawain, and
Gawain has a clac of 24 terratons which is also consistent with the other calcs, but as for context. idk if he was amped by NoTS, command seals, or Code Cast (Or all of the above) at that time..
Naturally Arash and his B++ Np should be > Fergus Lilies A+ but not by much right?
Also, Arash's NP is suprisingly consisent with some of the Causal blast calcs of Rhon and its probably based off of the Amu Draya (just with a Kinoko Nasu spin), and its calced at 25.49394518802 gigatons Gigatons
[2]
overall 6-C/High 6-C is looking consisent at least
if we use the 2nd calc here and use the low end and divie it by 2 its still High 6-C... but barely...
wait did any of i said make sense??? I had so much trouble trying to explain it!!!!
Edit: sooo i guess 6-C is looking consisent at least barring the exception of some A++ or higher NP's...
Edit 2: Assuming anything i said made sense....