Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did you respond to scaling Yang to Salem? Seems like Spinoirr was pushing for Low 7-B that way.That’s hardly any different from the original text. Either way I do plan on making a CRT for RWBY in the future, so if this CRT is done I’m closing it.
Wait, so what is the question exactly? Whether it should be assumed that Yang can release all energy she was priorly hit be in a single blow?Well, I do still agree that the method still sounds like damage stacking, but I can ping @DontTalkDT
I do not think he's familiar with the verse, but regarding a character who uses this scan. There is a character who can absorb kinetic energy from each and every hit she takes and use it to amplify her own strikes and double the potency of what was absorbed. I mentioned the logically mostly only works if they channel all of it into a single attack at best. And that it's not assumed that energy stacks after multiple consecutive hits in most cases as that's damage stacking. But DT appears to be quite knowledgeable on policies such as that, so I will ping him.
Edit: There is also a note that post-timeskip, she has a Cybernetic arm where that's the only way she can go all out with her stored in power. And said arm is much more durable than the rest of her body. Which there could be some hope for consistency, but not 100% certain.
Damage stacking in which sense?Basically, the OP is trying to mention how Yang's Semblance works. Is for each and every hit she takes, she gets stronger and stronger. Basically, she gets hit an X number of times, and the average attack potency of those attacks is Y. Then her attack potency becomes X * Y * 2 + whatever her base attack potency was. Would you consider that damage stacking?
The bomb is only for aura durability, not her semblances max power outageDamage stacking in which sense?
It, in any case, it sounds like an extremely problematic kind of multiplier, since it sounds like every time she has a serious fight she would get a few times more powerful which quickly goes beyond any kind of feat she (or someone she scales to) has. And since multipliers are only applied within reason, the moment anyone tanks that it would be contradicted in full.
If the bomb is in contradiction that would be enough to disregard the multiplier.
Not only is yang's ap with this multiplier lower than that of the bomb but she has the aforementioned feat of ripping a Low 7-B in half with her semblance already as well as oneshotting Elm, a 7-C, it just so happens that her semblance with the math applied is also Low 7-BIf the bomb is in contradiction that would be enough to disregard the multiplier.
I'm pretty sure 5 megatons is less then 6+ megatonsYou said that everyone’s aura’s max durability would scale yesterday, the bomb is not helping your case here when that’s weaker than your multiplier and they would die to said bomb.
What about this then?Also it could be explained away that they were scared of the civilians dying, as they have no aura and the whole goal was to protect the civilians and ironwood used that into his advantage to try to threaten team Rwby and everyone with the bomb. Hell it was after mantel and not atlas where they were so the bomb wasn't even ment for them
Actually they weren't as ironwood abandoned matel and his huntsmen were only on atals to defend it as shown by team NEONOther hunters and huntresses were in Mantle so they would’ve been caught in the bomb, it doesn’t help your case here.
Still yangs semblance should still be reworded toNo you see the happy huntresses there helping the city, they never came to atlas so this argument doesn’t work. So can you bring up anything else here that we haven’t even covered or no? If the latter then I’m gonna close this thread since there’s nothing left to discuss