Simon revisions (And I guess we also bring up High 1-C. Twice.)

[Andytrenom]

That doesn't really make a lot of sense though. They just start talking about the "10th and 11th dimensions" as if everyone is already supposed to know what they are when the verse so far hasn't established any sort of cosmology where these universes with these designations are something significant?

Them referring to the M-Theory dimensions would actually be hell of a lot more logical than them suddenly talking about two universes that were never mentioned before, only share their numbering with the number of dimensions postulated in science through sheer coincidence, and the statement that they are universes of a multiverse never being explained any further.

However I agree with you that the "existing between dimensions" bit doesn't make a lot of sense.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

How about "At least high 2-A, possibly high 1-C"?

 

[Elizhaa]

That doesn't really make a lot of sense though. They just start talking about the "10th and 11th dimensions" as if everyone is already supposed to know what they are when the verse so far hasn't established any sort of cosmology where these universes with these designations are something significant?
Them referring to the M-Theory dimensions would actually be hell of a lot more logical than them suddenly talking about two universes that were never mentioned before, only share their numbering with the number of dimensions postulated in science through sheer coincidence, and the statement that they are universes of a multiverse never being explained any further.

However I agree with you that the "existing between dimensions" bit doesn't make a lot of sense.

Lordgenome is Extraordinary Genius and he did get input on the topic from Leeron Littner who is a genius so it is saying the cosmology does not make sense here looks unlikely.

 

[Kaltias]

Nedge I don't think that you understood Andy's point.

He isn't saying that Lordgenome is dumb. He is saying that the statement doesn't seem High 1-C in context.

@Zach

There are no High 1-C statements though

 

[Andytrenom]

@Kal Uhmm you kinda misunderstood yourself. I'm saying them being Universes doesn't make sense in context.

 

[Kaltias]

I thought you were saying that they are M-theory dimensions? That's what I meant with "not High 1-C"

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

It's only one statement that mentions it, but it still seems considerable. I don't see what's wrong with a "possibly"

 

[Andytrenom]

Well, I was but not with the intent of debunking High 1-C.

If it does tho, oh well.

 

[Crzer07]

Do we not take M-theory for higher dimensions?

 

[Andytrenom]

I think we do...unless they portray it accurately.

 

[DMUA]

Dang it can I just get my Sandbox applied to the page so we can get this thread overwith

 

[Elizhaa]

DMUA, finals are to blame

 

[Elizhaa]

Dang it can I just get my Sandbox applied to the page so we can get this thread overwith

To be honest, you did extend the original topic in the CRT with the High 1-C discussion and others to be in the CRT.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

Personally I think at least high 2-A possibly high 1-C is best

 

[Elizhaa]

Personally I think at least high 2-A possibly high 1-C is best

I agree this is the better option

 

[DMUA]

There is no middle ground that would reach High 2-A though

Either the Dimensional forkery is forked and they're 2-B or it isn't and they're High 1-C.

Can you just see if there are any abilites I'm missing

 

[RKGenki]

@DMUA that's not true tho

There is dimensional forkery, but the 10th and 11th dimensions as mentioned in the series aren't referring to dimensional axes in any reasonable way. That's the reason for the At least high 2-A, possibly higher. There are higher dimensions, but the amount is unknown

 

[DMUA]

Higher Dimensions... But, if the 10th and 11th dimensions aren't actual dimensions, is there any real proof the Anti Spiral would scale to said Dimensional levels?

 

[Kaltias]

The 10th and 11th aren't. But they still said that AS' universe has a different set of dimensional axis (legitimate geometrical dimensions).

If it's a 5-D universe, the feat is High 2-A

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

I stillll think at least high 2-A possibly high 1-C is best. Am I alone on that?

 

[RKGenki]

High 1-C isn't legit, there's no reason to have it

 

[DMUA]

I stillll think at least high 2-A possibly high 1-C is best. Am I alone on that?

Extremely alone.

This dimension is in-between universes, not transcendent of them or anything of the like. In fact, being on a different Dimensional axis could just as easily refer to the fourth instead of the fifth, leading to Low 2-C. I see nothing for High 2-A.

2-B is where I'm sticking.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

Creating the spacetime of a realm with at least 4 spatial dimensions is High 2-A dude

 

[Kaltias]

Our universe already has four dimensions though

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

Our Universe = 3 spatial dimensions and 1 temporal dimensions

Anti Spirals Universe (That it made) = "More than 3" spatial dimensions and 1 temporal dimension

 

[DMUA]

>A 4D feat is High 2-A


JonTron - Excuse me, what?

I mean, sure, it could be Higher, but all that warrents is "Likely Higher", it's not specified enough for a solid rating.

Heck, "a different Dimensional axis" could mean a lower dimension if you take a second to think about it. Of course, that's an impractical assumption, but it could be the case.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

4 + 1 = 5

So Anti Spiral created something 5-D

 

[Ricsi-viragosi]

4 + 1 = 5

So Anti Spiral created something 5-D

Dude, you got the 4 from adding the temporal axis.

By that logic ecery higher D ia 5D.

 

[Kaltias]

Heck, "a different Dimensional axis" could mean a lower dimension if you take a second to think about it. Of course, that's an impractical assumption, but it could be the case.

It really can't. If that universe was spatially 1/2-D, people wouldn't fit inside it

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

I don't see how it can really be less than High 2-A, even if High 1-C is a stretch.

 

[DMUA]

4 + 1 = 5

So Anti Spiral created something 5-D

Except... They made a universe with time... That's just 3+1 is 4. There is no 4 in place of the 3 here. I don't get what you're going at.

It really can't. If that universe was spatially 1/2-D, people wouldn't fit inside it

Ah. Yeah, I see.

 

[Kaltias]

Essentially what i'm trying to say is:

Number of dimensions =/= 4

We know that 3-D is the same otherwise everything would be spatially flat.

We know that it has time, reaching 4-D.

So if it's at least 4-D but can't be 4-D, It's 5-D

 

[DMUA]

But question

Why can't it be 4D

I don't see that implication anywhere

 

[Kaltias]

"Different set of dimensional axes" = "not the same as our universe" (which is 4-D)

 

[DMUA]

I guess that makes sense much to my disgruntlement

.... Actually scratch that that means I don't have to deal with nearly as many Gurren Lagann matchups, I approve greatly

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

I guess that makes sense much to my disgruntlement
.... Actually scratch that that means I don't have to deal with nearly as many Gurren Lagann matchups, I approve greatly

BRB, Planning on Spamming Simon and Anti-Spiral against a ton of other 5-D characters

 

[DMUA]

This is why you have no friends

 

[DMUA]

... me posting this would also require I edit every other Tier 2 profile accordingly

Which I guess I can do, if everyone's okay with said profile and we actually get this forkery done.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

Possibly High 1-C

 

[DMUA]

Possibly ur mum