- 8,303
- 1,721
- Thread starter
- #121
@Ricsi-viragosi
>Why did you make that when Antoniofer already made it?
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/3410806#74
If you want to discuss that using the concept art will give us the minimum value that Ruby lifted so that way we won't get inflated results because inconsistency in the show, then that would be a valid point if you explain why. But his calc was never evaluated in his blog, so there is that.
>Anyways, pixel scaling was found to be too inconsistent back in the og crt that downgraded them... As you should have guessed when the feats go from class 50 to class K.
It is, but we at least need one calc accepted in the blog, if we don't have that then we have nothing to link in the profile.
>There is also an official height for nevermore, and even more the thing is barely half as chubby as an actual raven is.
You mean the concept art or an especific, stated size?
>It was accepted before Dargoo's point about epicenters and stuff.
Well, the calc should be looked again to adress the points.
>Feilong needs to be either proven or disregarded.
Yeah, let's wait for WeeklyBattles, since they said that would post the scan.
>My points about Yang's temple run should also be answered.
The guy who calculated this at NF assumed that the rubble at 8:18 is the same at 9:22, this may or may not fall into usable, as some franshises use the "resume" technique. But this seems far too inconsistent plus the assumtions made to be in the fine side, so it shouldn't be used imo.
>Why did you make that when Antoniofer already made it?
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/3410806#74
If you want to discuss that using the concept art will give us the minimum value that Ruby lifted so that way we won't get inflated results because inconsistency in the show, then that would be a valid point if you explain why. But his calc was never evaluated in his blog, so there is that.
>Anyways, pixel scaling was found to be too inconsistent back in the og crt that downgraded them... As you should have guessed when the feats go from class 50 to class K.
It is, but we at least need one calc accepted in the blog, if we don't have that then we have nothing to link in the profile.
>There is also an official height for nevermore, and even more the thing is barely half as chubby as an actual raven is.
You mean the concept art or an especific, stated size?
>It was accepted before Dargoo's point about epicenters and stuff.
Well, the calc should be looked again to adress the points.
>Feilong needs to be either proven or disregarded.
Yeah, let's wait for WeeklyBattles, since they said that would post the scan.
>My points about Yang's temple run should also be answered.
The guy who calculated this at NF assumed that the rubble at 8:18 is the same at 9:22, this may or may not fall into usable, as some franshises use the "resume" technique. But this seems far too inconsistent plus the assumtions made to be in the fine side, so it shouldn't be used imo.
