• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Antvasima said:
Okay. I suppose that 3 months is probably fine then.

It would be good if Medeus or some other administrator gives him an instruction message regarding how he needs to behave after he comes back.
Click to expand...
I left him a message on his wall on this forum.
 
This user has been changing the statistics of many characters, even though I have warned him and given him instructions and re-warned him he keeps doing it, so I think he should be banned what seemed to me to be an inexperienced user now seems to be trolling.

Edit. He keep doing that.
 
Last edited:
Dereck03 said:
This user has been changing the statistics of many characters, even though I have warned him and given him instructions and re-warned him he keeps doing it, so I think he should be banned what seemed to me to be an inexperienced user now seems to be trolling.

Edit. He keep doing that.
Click to expand...
I guess a ban is in order.
 
Dereck03 said:
This user has been changing the statistics of many characters, even though I have warned him and given him instructions and re-warned him he keeps doing it, so I think he should be banned what seemed to me to be an inexperienced user now seems to be trolling.

Edit. He keep doing that.
Click to expand...
Sent to the Sarlacc pit for eternal digestion
 
Dereck has reversed most of the edits, I helped with a few.
 
Antvasima said:
I checked through all of them. @Dereck03 had not properly reverted one of them, so I corrected that page. Thank you both for helping out in any case.
Click to expand...
It was too late (4 am) so I went to sleep, so I only took care of the edits before I went to sleep, thanks for helping with the rest.
 
Last edited:
No problem. Thanks again.
 
Reporting Ebitan for their behavior on this thread

For those who don't want to read everything, let me highlight some of his stuff:

1."Can't accept criticism I see and acts like a bully. Typical man-child behaviour."

2. "Lol who was the one being passive aggressive first when I hurt his fragile ego because I put his credibility into question? He wants to be a bully then don't blame me if I respond aggressively as well."

3. "Wow didn't know this place is run by dictatorship. How dare I question the way things are done or the few people who runs this place like a dictator, right? Oh nono, we don't practice democracy here, anyone who dares to voice their opinion gotta leave. Did I hurt any feelings here? Damn. Amazing really, keep up the good work guys!"

4. "I don't give a shit about about this site's broken ass logic and scaling for One Piece characters."

5. "I don't use this site just for One Piece, just so happen to drop by once in a while. I just can't help laughing my ass off at seeing the whacky shit over here. Actually, I might come here even more often to get my doses of comedy."

6. "I don't care enough to make a CRT about it since nothing will get changed here if the majority of the One Piece supporters here are as intelligent as you guys, what's the point when the demographic here is so one sided? Doesn't mean I need to be silent about the comedy here."

7. "That's the whole ******* point, I am making fun of how the "scaling" works here."

8. "I have too much fun watching comedy here, why would I want to leave? ******* love it when I see you and your genius friends try to sound intelligent and bring up your ingenius CRTs, it is entertaining."

9. "Why would I want to leave when you are so adorable and entertaining? Look at how feisty you are, reminds me of my cat when I forgot to feed it breakfast. Creating a CRT is wasted energy on the demographic here who are mostly as intelligent as you are like I said, I am fine with raising your blood pressure every now and then."

10. "Exactly, no one should be allowed criticize their highness and this site's unique scaling for One Piece characters, right?"

There is more, but I think that's enough...It's not for me to say if he deserves a strict warning or a ban, but it is CLEAR that they don't really care about the site and it is only here to laugh at us and instigate drama for their own amusement.
 
Mariogoods said:

Error | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom

vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
Vandalism and I have managed to reverted it.

Since the user has done many normal edits before, I feel that there is something wrong in his account.
Click to expand...
That's not a real profile. Yes I will gatekeep.

It's not a character, it's not even a weapon, it's just an advert.

I've already spoken to people about it and apparently it's gonna get deleted, so might as well have some fun before it's gone.
 
Udlmaster said:
That's not a real profile. Yes I will gatekeep.

It's not a character, it's not even a weapon, it's just an advert.

I've already spoken to people about it and apparently it's gonna get deleted, so might as well have some fun before it's gone.
Click to expand...
Still, it is not appreciate to vandal pages as long as it is still in the wiki.
 
Antvasima said:
I blocked the member for trolling and making advertisements.

User contributions for DiAma1 | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom

vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
Click to expand...
Wait, I feel that giving DiAma1 an infinite ban may be a bit unfair since the user's previous edits are not ad-based so the user is less likely an ad-bot. Therefore, I request for shortening DiAma1's ban.

Also, I'm not suggesting for a ban on DiAma1 at all. Udlmaster vandals the deleted profile and I feel that the profile should not be vandalized even if the profile is awaiting for deletion. While I understand his intention to make fun, vandalizing profile is still not an appropriate thing. It is likely not good to allow any "waiting-to-be-deleted" profiles to experience any type of vandalism. (nearly blanking the page while not being the page creator in this case) I feel that Udlmaster may need to receive a warning.
 
I think that y'all are seriously misinterpreting the user's actions. Do you think that DEATH BATTLE!, a YouTube channel with over 5 million subscribers, is paying people to sneak jokey advertisement profiles onto vsbw? Suggesting that the user's account was hacked/hijacked or something....

The page read like some enthusiastic fan making a silly page. They don't need a permanent ban, they need a temporary ban and an instruction to use JBW instead.
 
Okay. I will lessen the block to a month instead, and give the member in question a warning in conjunction.
 
Never mind. I removed the block and gave a warning instead.

vsbattles.fandom.com

DiAma1

vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
 
Agnaa said:
I think that y'all are seriously misinterpreting the user's actions. Do you think that DEATH BATTLE!, a YouTube channel with over 5 million subscribers, is paying people to sneak jokey advertisement profiles onto vsbw? Suggesting that the user's account was hacked/hijacked or something....

The page read like some enthusiastic fan making a silly page. They don't need a permanent ban, they need a temporary ban and an instruction to use JBW instead.
Click to expand...
Antvasima said:
Okay. I will lessen the block to a month instead, and give the member in question a warning in conjunction.
Click to expand...

No, "user" I referring throughout the report is NOT DiAma1. It is, unfortunately, Udlmaster.

Error | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom

vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
The revision is Udlmaster's edit, not DiAma1. He vandals a profile while the profile is awaiting for possible deletion. I feel that profiles, even the profiles awaiting for deletion, should not be vandalized for fun. In the link above, you could see Udlmaster replaced all the content of the deleted profile with a funny sentence.
 
The degree of harm that vandalism is considered so because of the state of the profile.

If one knows for sure (which I did) that a page was to be deleted for breaking rules, then there is no harm done by changing the page.

This is because it isn't a profile in the first place, it's like if someone posted nothing but a bunch of pictures for a profile.

Someone then changing that to "Someone delete this" isn't vandalism, because it's not a profile, the same thing applies here, it was clearly not a profile and very obviously was going to be deleted.

Any precedent set would be "Profiles that are confirmed for deletion may be changed as they are being deleted", which doesn't actually change or hurt anyone.

There is no degree of harm, only fun to be made.
 
Last edited:
Udlmaster said:
The degree of harm that vandalism is considered so because of the state of the profile.

If one knows for sure (which I did) that a page was to be deleted for breaking rules, then there is no harm done by changing the page.

This is because it isn't a profile in the first place, it's like if someone posted nothing but a bunch of pictures for a profile.

Someone then changing that to "Someone delete this" isn't vandalism, because it's not a profile, the same thing applies here, it was clearly not a profile and very obviously was going to be deleted.

Any precedent set would be "Profiled that are confirmed for deletion may be changed as they are being deleted", which doesn't actually change or hurt anyone.

There is no degree of harm, only fun to be made.
Click to expand...
Thanks for your argument. I feel that it is better to leave the admin to judge if it is vandalism.
 
No problem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
37 38 39
Replies
2K
Views
113K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Discussion Rules lil Revision
Replies
39
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Antvasima
  • Sticky
  • Featured
Extremely important announcements for our community
Replies
31
Views
6K
Agnaa
Agnaa
  • Locked
Clarification Of Sentence Phrasings And Addition Of Expected Punishments For Each Type Of Rule Breach For All Rules Pages
Replies
21
Views
2K
Mahek_The_Assassin_Silent_Killer
AThe1412
Can you restrict a character's Standard Equipment if it gives them a different tier?
Replies
2
Views
711
TheGreatJedi13
TheGreatJedi13
Back
Top