- 4,325
- 732
He responded before, and after tell to Ant he occupied. It's called respect to wait if he have thing to tellUltima won't even responded to DT lol, he just says he won't be in wiki for a while.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He responded before, and after tell to Ant he occupied. It's called respect to wait if he have thing to tellUltima won't even responded to DT lol, he just says he won't be in wiki for a while.
It's 9D with new crt that is accepted but not applied.Looking at profiles I don't see anything 9D. Only 7D as they exist explicitly beyond the 6 dimensions and nothing about moon cell. BB Cele who just scales to regular old 8D.
Accepted right?It's 9D with new crt that is not applied.
Yes i would not talked about it otherwise.Accepted right?
DT also included stuff like being beyond all definition/concepts.I don't understand the rush. The root is still given apophatic theology which is 1A. The downgrade doesn't apply to the root.
Ok?DT also included stuff like being beyond all definition/concepts.
DT downgraded apophatic theology in the sens that now 1-A need the explicit evidence that infinity hierarchie exist in the verse (through mention or feat). Tho it's already tell that we will need to discuss the case of root in other threadI don't understand the rush. The root is still given apophatic theology which is 1A. The downgrade doesn't apply to the root.
The entire reason why root is 1-A is because it is beyond Dimensional theory. Apophatic never was used in the upgrade thread.I don't understand the rush. The root is still given apophatic theology which is 1A. The downgrade doesn't apply to the root.
This affects its apophasis. Apophatic Theology was also never an official thing to tier by but the judgement/opinion of Ultima.
Actualy no. Dimension theory is the support argument to [] being apophatic and 1-A (it was used when talked about how [] can't be described and that every extension of possible reality still couldn't comprehension it).The entire reason why root is 1-A is because it is beyond Dimensional theory. Apophatic never was used in the upgrade thread.
Meh, you can upgrade it again after I downgrade it.
Tell that to @CrimsonStarFallen, apophatic still be fallen under Low 1-A.Actualy no. Dimension theory is the support argument to [] being apophatic and 1-A (it was used when talked about how [] can't be described and that every extension of possible reality still couldn't comprehension it).
So why bother touching the root profile then when the thread hasn't even been made for it? Why the rush lmao? As far as I remembered, Apophatic Theology wasn't mentioned once in the downgrade crt so I don't see why DT's new justifications would apply to it.DT downgraded apophatic theology in the sens that now 1-A need the explicit evidence that infinity hierarchie exist in the verse (through mention or feat). Tho it's already tell that we will need to discuss the case of root in other thread
Don't need to tell me i participate in creating the CRT. And one more time your CRT is still not accepted for nowTell that to @CrimsonStarFallen, apophatic still be fallen under Low 1-A.
According to this wiki, thats false. I literally made a crt about this and it got rejected because Apophatic Theology was considered the main reason for 1A root. No way y'all are switching now because you want to downgrade the verse.The entire reason why root is 1-A is because it is beyond Dimensional theory. Apophatic never was used in the upgrade thread.
Bcz apophatic theology would still need the existence of infinity hierarchie to be 1-A now.So why bother touching the root profile then when the thread hasn't even been made for it? Why the rush lmao? As far as I remembered, Apophatic Theology wasn't mentioned once in the downgrade crt so I don't see why DT's new justifications would apply to it.
That was never stated in the crt. Apophatic Theology wasn't even brought up. No one mentioned how it worked, or whether the downgrade applies to it.Bcz apophatic theology would still need the existence of infinity hierarchie to be 1-A now.
It is in the DT thread. We talked about it in the end ( DT thread is not the same as this guy thread)That was never stated in the crt. Apophatic Theology wasn't even brought up. No one mentioned how it worked, or whether the downgrade applies to it.
I mean your thread in itself change nothing for me. I already tell before. But even with L1-A thing, root can be 1-A bcz of some World feat (having a replica of the root inside earth and root still being completly transcend to it).Well for now.
For now.
Hahaha.
Can you link the thread to me?It is in the DT thread. We talked about it in the end ( DT thread is not the same as this guy thread)
Eh.. DT kinda contradicts it being low 1-ATell that to @CrimsonStarFallen, apophatic still be fallen under Low 1-A.
I don't see anything about Apophatic Theology there. Only the true infinity stuff which DT didn't even reply to.
Literally the being beyond all definition/concepts is exactly what Apophatic Theology is.I don't see anything about Apophatic Theology there. Only the true infinity stuff which DT didn't even reply to.
Yeah no shit, if its a replica. The it is not apophatic.I mean your thread in itself change nothing for me. I already tell before. But even with L1-A thing, root can be 1-A bcz of some World feat (having a replica of the root inside earth and root still being completly transcend to it).
DT thread is more weird bcz root don't have many mention with infinity bullshit (people can't even understand it why they would mention infinity bullshit)
It's more complex that just replica but it's not here to talk about it... And it's don't need to be apophatic to be L1-A apparently for you. (You litteraly tell it 5 min ago?)Yeah no shit, if its a replica. The it is not apophatic.
You also forgot being ineffable, and unreachable right? Honestly, I don't have to argue rn. The thread isn't even accepted yet.Literally the being beyond all definition/concepts is exactly what Apophatic Theology is.
DT thread is acceptedYou also forgot being ineffable, and unreachable right? Honestly, I don't have to argue rn. The thread isn't even accepted yet.
Ineffable is basically what I said.You also forgot being ineffable, and unreachable right? Honestly, I don't have to argue rn. The thread isn't even accepted yet.
Thay thread has nothing to do with Apophatic theology. Even Ultima agreed to that thread. There was no mention or reference to Apophatic Theology.DT thread is accepted
DT litteraly tell that root would be 9D if we don't give enough argument. DT don't like apophatic theology and it's in part why he made this threadThay thread has nothing to do with Apophatic theology. Even Ultima agreed to that thread. There was no mention or reference to Apophatic Theology.
Not meCan you mfer don't derail staff discussion thread with peanut gallery fr?
Ok? Tell me when DT mentioned Apophatic Theology in that thread. The only mentioned was dimensional theories. If he mentioned Apophatic Theology, you think Ultima would have agreed?DT litteraly tell that root would be 9D if we don't give enough argument. DT don't like apophatic theology and it's in part why he made this thread
He wouldn't, but it's not the point, Ultima will surely make a thread later for it. But as of now it's accepted.Ok? Tell me when DT mentioned Apophatic Theology in that thread. The only mentioned was dimensional theories. If he mentioned Apophatic Theology, you think Ultima would have agreed?
There was a whole discussion about the overvoid and its nature of being a beyond dimensional blank canvas and being completely ineffable and beyond conceptsOk? Tell me when DT mentioned Apophatic Theology in that thread. The only mentioned was dimensional theories. If he mentioned Apophatic Theology, you think Ultima would have agreed?