- 13,587
- 5,754
If they say no to one then they are saying no to the other by proxy. It's not like any of them said they agree with one but not the other.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think that's the best route to go. The range intertwines very heavily into this discussion already. We'd essentially just be closing the thread, only to make a new one that either acts as a continuation of where we already are or having to repeat the exact same arguments made yet again to get to where we are currently.ProfessorKukui4Life said:No, this is a thread to upgrade Zeref to Low 2-C (which was denied). So this thread should be closed and someone else make another thread to address his range being wrong. Simple.
Exactly. So as the saying goes, make a seperate CRT to address it.Sigurd Snake in The Eye said:If it was added without a crt it needs to be removed regardless.
No you don't. There was a literal problem where this happened with Kingdom Hearts adding things to profiles that weren't accepted. As soon as it was pointed out and noticed, those changes were automatically removed. If something isn't accepted by the community, then it can't be applied to the page. There isn't an exception here if it was just unnoticed.DragonGamerZ913 said:You need admin approval before making changes like that, so you'd need admin approval as well.
Can you show it was accepted? This is why people are saying it should be removed, not because they think it's wrong. If it wasn't accepted by anyone, we HAVE to remove it until it might be accepted later.DragonGamerZ913 said:Except this was actually something accepted. You need staff approval, not any member can go and make a change simply because they think it's wrong.
DragonGamerZ913 said:Except this was actually something accepted. You need staff approval, not any member can go and make a change simply because they think it's wrong.
ShadowGun45 said:Type 1 acausality and unconventional resistance to soul manipulation was accepted ?
Here we go again, the story is changing. First it went from it was accepted to "it's commonly agreed upon". That means it wasn't officially accepted and it can't be applied automatically given this thread highlights it clearly is a controversial issue that is under heavy dispute. The range needs to be immediately removed since this is the case.DragonGamerZ913 said:What isn't manipulative to you? No one's made a CRT for this because it's commonly agreed on, especially since time resets have been accepted as Low 2-C, and given what Zeref was saying, this really isn't any different. How many times do I have to repeat myself?