• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Mr. Bambu
Reaction score
19,387

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Silence after one message means I missed it; silence after two means "no".
    Hello Mr._Bambu, I have a question regarding the creation of a character profile. I don't know if I have to address my question to you or someone else, but since you seem knowledgeable, I'll give it a try.

    Basically, I want to make the profile of a RPG character which has a lot of weapons, armors, shields and accessories. Most of the armors and shields don't do anything special, so mentioning them wouldn't be useful, I think. The problem resides mostly in the weapons because they are very different (ranging from magical staves with a certain elemental ability, different weapons with more or less range, etc) and gives the character a lot of elemental manipulation alongside other abilities. However, I don't know how I should proceed regarding the editing of the page.

    Should I go :

    Fire manipulation (Via Fire weapons) with "Fire Weapons" redirecting toward an imgur album of said weapons.

    or

    Fire Manipulation (Via [Name of the weapons])

    or

    Fire Manipulation (Via Fire weapons) while having a tabber with "Fire weapons" or "Element weapons" in the standard equipment category.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I dislike unnecessary bloat when I'm making a profile, so I will be clear from the outset here: all of those are probably suitable and our policies generally afford all of those to be done. My opinion would be that listing them in the equipment category would be non-essential- of the three, I'd probably go with the second with an optional add-on saying something like "all of these weapons can be seen here" with the word "here" hyperlinking to an Imgur gallery similar to the first option.
    SweetDao
    SweetDao
    Thank you very much for your answer! However, I still have a question, should I still list every weapon name? For some abilities, there are only two or three so that's mostly fine, but for a more broad category (fire manipulation, for example) there are 8 different weapons. I'm afraid it would bloat the profile, especially since other "common elemental attribute" have a similar number of weapons.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I would list at least two, so like... "Fire Manipulation via Flametongue, Flamelash, and other weapons". In the case of two or three it's fine, yeah.
    Hello, can you take a look at this CRT, i have done some calculations for the verse and I'd like to apply them. By the way, do i need one or two staff votes?

    Do we need permission to create top 10 (whatever ability) for each tier thread?
    If we do can you give me yours i want to do top 10 non omniscient thread for every tier
    If we don't where do we make these?
    Content revision? Or fun and games?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    no, you just need a severe lack of self-respect and value for your own time.

    and, probably General Discussion or Fun & Games. these aren't officially recognized threads, just what people think is right.
    Jozaysmith?
    Jozaysmith?
    That first part sounded personal, but thanks
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    to an extent. they haven't wronged me outside of being very silly. I find them personally stupid, and decided to step away from them after D&D had already gotten most of the top spots at the time.
    Would you mind giving your input here, please?

    By the way wanted to ask if you're cool with abstract existence threads?
    Jozaysmith?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    As a general rule of thumb, I dislike entering threads based on higher concepts.

    I understand them fine, but these threads are most often susceptible to creative interpretations, such that they are a headache to deal with and there are many other mods who actively enjoy discussing it. I do not, and so I try and leave them alone unless they intersect with something I do like, such as Dark Souls or D&D.

    If you absolutely cannot get other mods to lend their eyes, I will do my due diligence, but I must also warn you that I am a great deal stricter on concepts such as abstract existence than most.
    Jozaysmith?
    Jozaysmith?
    i got other mods and i get what you mean actually although this have been a long time thing in the series and past threads have validated that and additional thread was used for clarification since character X purest form is law of fire burning everything like this, Thanks for your input to my request mr bambu and please be well as well as take care of yourself
    Hello, I wonder if we can open a general discussion for the Magi series (frankly, I don't know much about these things, so I thought I should ask a higher authority)
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Hi, I missed this entirely.

    Yeah, probably. Go nuts.
    We need the Calculation Group's opinion. Would you mind giving your opinion? Thank you.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I do apologize for not replying to your first one. My presence here on the wiki was sporadic due to my computer being repaired, I only picked it up late Thursday night.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    This probably could have just been an adjustment of the old calc, but alright. If it isn't evaluated by the time my PC is fixed I'll take a look.

    I'll take a look regardless, really, but you will get eyes on this eventually, is my point.
    JustANormalLemon
    JustANormalLemon
    I didn't understood what You meant but okay, thank You
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    PC broken. Try get other person. I look when PC not broken. Yes yes.
    need input, if possible, bring other staff here?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I can, at some point, but I killed my PC and am attempting resuscitation, so I have limited time on the wiki currently.
    hello can you check this tier upgrade?

    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I haven't been interested in Fortnite since the end of Year 1 or thereabouts lol.

    I can try, though, when I have a moment. Ought to tell you that I can indeed still see deleted messages, by the by.
    Vzearr
    Vzearr
    oh... I deleted it cause I thought I was asking for to much evals, sorry. Thank you though.
    • Like
    Reactions: Nierre
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    You might be, might not be- the mods can see it either way lol. I didn't reply because I was busy today, and somehow my least busiest moment is... now. At work. Hah.
    For some reason I can't awnser Your coment in my blogs while in my cellphone so for now I will talk here...

    What You mean that's not how we do thigs here?


    That's exactly how overwatch got It's speed
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    Why did you assume that.
    JustANormalLemon
    JustANormalLemon
    That's the entire skulk thing, reacting to sound, the particle comes from the sound source and in direction of the skulk that reacts only after the particle hit's It, same thig with the warden detection

    That particle at least seen to be a representation of the sound traveling to the skulk

    Also, even if the calc can't be used, can you at least say if the math is correct in the blog?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I would not want people becoming confused that a calc is acceptable to use, so no. I also just don't have a lot of desire to check the math of something I can verify as unusable without the work.
    Deagonx
    Deagonx
    You are a gentleman and a scholar. Now that I have used up my Bambu token, I promise not to call on you for such a task again until the token refresh two months from now.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I intend to begin charging subscription fees.
    Deagonx
    Deagonx
    I'll get Diamond.
    Hi bambu, can you give some feedback on this thread?🙏

    Could you check this out? i wouldnt normally summon you for nasu threads, but im running outta options. but hey, at least its tier 5 shit instead of tier 1 shit.
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    nope
    BasedNecoScaler69
    BasedNecoScaler69
    well, i tried. is 2-0 enough to apply a revision?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    non-controversial verse, yes. controversial, our rules state 3 staff with proper evaluation rights.
    I'm sorry to bother you , but I really need another staff approval. I would be very grateful if you could help me 🙏
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    aye, though in the future, do leave my ass outta HST stuff.
    my 20,000th message on this godforsaken forum: piss
    Greatsage13th
    InfiniteDay
    InfiniteDay
    image.png
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    it scorns me, mocks me with its lack of an updated figure, torments me in the dead of night. indeed, I am defeated.

    Look at how I massacred my boy
    Do you think that the content revision thread linked at the end of this message has received enough agreement for me to apply the revisions? There has only been agreement, including by staff members, but with not much depth in discussion due to weeks of inactivity at various points. If the agreement is insufficient, then feel free to evaluate it if you want to, though it might require specific knowledge about hax scaling and/or The Amazing World of Gumball.
    Gumball Protagonist Explanation Blog Post
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    The Tier 2 stuff is not suitably accepted- only Mav has accepted that, you require minimum two evaluating staff member approvals (no thanks, for me). Propellus did not clearly give an evaluation of that point (you may want to have him return or get another voice on the matter). The non-tiering related things should be fine.
    James_Plays_4_Games
    James_Plays_4_Games
    Thanks for clarifying. 👍
    Hey, look, katana zero revision
    Howdy! Could I post in this thread? I don't want to contest anything, I just want to bring up a unique example of a celebrity's persona, that being Nick Cage from Dead By Daylight

    I wanna run this past the thread and see if he can remain under the new rules
    Sorry bother you, can you give your input here?



    Hey, Bambu! Do you mnd evaluating this calculation and taking a look at this thread, please?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I say this with full seriousness: I don't know. Mario is infamously a pretty toxic verse to deal in, and working on one pretty obvious CRT in the past still led to a great deal of controversy for months to follow. I like Mario games, but the supporters on this wiki and in the broader scaling community make me hesitant to engage in it here.
    Omnificence
    Omnificence
    Okay, I respect your opinion; thank you anyway. Btw, I also plan on making a couple calculations, one for creating a dimension with a planet and one for creating one with a solar system. What formula should I use?
    Mr. Bambu
    Mr. Bambu
    I don't know that the dimension itself would actually matter these days? Our standards are hazy on it. We used to just use the explosion calc, like here- but that standard may well have changed without my knowledge, or these calcs may no longer be acceptable.

    However: I was fairly sure we already had calcs of the nature you're saying, that used that method.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top