• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

I was the only one arguing in favor of one month, all others seem to agree with three. My interest is in getting the situation resolved as quickly as possible, I just tend to be more on the merciful side when the offender was unaware of the extent of their offenses.

I'm fine with three months.
 
Mr._Bambu said:
I was the only one arguing in favor of one month, all others seem to agree with three. My interest is in getting the situation resolved as quickly as possible, I just tend to be more on the merciful side when the offender was unaware of the extent of their offenses.

I'm fine with three months.
Click to expand...
Okay. How do we "enact" that, do we just tell him?
 
Until the decided upon date (if we do three months, that would be 8/3/2023), any time he posts on a Nasuverse thread of any type would be considered a rule violation in of itself and is reportable. A true ban may be handed out in this instance.
 
Expectro2000xxx said:
Just a small correction, he have 7 crts open plus the other two made Sunday so in total he currently have 9 open crts, but 14 of those crt happened between March and this Sunday, the months before that were 1-2 other threads but they were normally spaced. That intensity was the reason of propose 3 months instead of just 1.
Click to expand...
A few of those crts were continuations of older ones, or moved because a staff member asked me to
I can deal with a month, but 3 seems a bit too excessive. I generally waited until my threads were either closed or about a week before creating new ones
 
Mr._Bambu said:
Until the decided upon date (if we do three months, that would be 8/3/2023), any time he posts on a Nasuverse thread of any type would be considered a rule violation in of itself and is reportable. A true ban may be handed out in this instance.
Click to expand...
It seems best if you post an official message on his forum wall for this purpose, to make it easier to keep track of for us.
 
I believe something like this happened in the past, some I'm just going to report it. Peppersalt43 has been liking posts in some sort of mad rampage, and I'm not the only person who's had their likes artificially inflated from the looks of their wall.
 
Well, there have been some at least one conspiracy from regular members to artificially inflate the number of likes for a friend of theirs enormously beyond what they have actually earned from helping out, but since it was found out that time, I simply reset it to zero, so it is always a risky gamble to engage in, and it will not lead to anybody receiving a staff position from that alone, so it is also essentially an unproductive waste of time.
 
Are we seriously hounding someone cause he likes posts? Jesus, lads.

I've seen Pepper around and I can say he doesn't mean anything within a solar system's reach of malicious with it. And if you think it's annoying, need I remind that Like notifications go away after you click the bell once. They don't stick around like replies and mentions do. This is really a non-issue.
 
Arceus0x said:
this user changed Bayonetta's tier to low 2-C and 2-A

could be clueless
Click to expand...
This edit seems to have been reapplied again on her tier section

vsbattles.fandom.com

Bayonetta (Original)

Bayonetta (real name Cereza), is a coquettish, mysterious Umbra Witch and the eponymous protagonist of the Bayonetta series. As suave as she is dangerous, she blasts her way through the armies of Paradiso and Inferno to recover the memories she lost after a five-hundred-year slumber, with her...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
 
A lot of OPM supporters who made these actually didn't know about the discussion rule, nor were they keeping up with the exact number of threads that were open at the time. Even ByAsura, an administrator among the OPM supporters, was unaware of this rule.

Anyway, I guess the warning is justifiable since not knowing the rule isn't an excuse, but I wanted to clear that up.

Also, all the CRTs that have been made have been made with genuine effort and quality. And some of them actually get staff permission to post them. So I believe this is mostly just a result of confusion.
 
Phoenks said:
A lot of OPM supporters who made these actually didn't know about the discussion rule, nor were they keeping up with the exact number of threads that were open at the time. Even ByAsura, an administrator among the OPM supporters, was unaware of this rule.

Anyway, I guess the warning is justifiable since not knowing the rule isn't an excuse, but I wanted to clear that up.

Also, all the CRTs that have been made have been made with genuine effort and quality. And some of them actually get staff permission to post them. So I believe this is mostly just a result of confusion.
Click to expand...
As i mentioned those people who even knew about the rule made three CRTs in a single day.
Regardless ,they should be closed and reopened 3 at a time.
 
Aachintya31 said:
OPM supporters should be told not to spam multiple CRTs continuously.
These are the number of Active CRTs under discussion. (9+)
These are the Active CRTs within last 24 hrs. There are even more inconclusive CRTs as well
They seem to know the discussion rule, still ignore it
Click to expand...
I didn't even know there was a rule. Also, you've linked multiple of the same thread. Also, some of these have been dead since 2022 and were necro'd. Also, staff are actively participating in at least half of these, I'm sure they don't even know.
 
Golden_Void said:
I didn't even know there was a rule. Also, you've linked multiple of the same thread. Also, some of these have been dead since 2022 and were necro'd. Also, staff are actively participating in at least half of these, I'm sure they don't even know.
Click to expand...
kek. There are still 8+ active CRTs which had comments within last 24 hours.
Just go on the first 2 page of content revision forum , its filled with OPM CRTs. Having Staff comments in those threads doesn't make it legitimate to break a discussion rule.
They should be outright be closed and reopened 3 at a time.
 
Crabwhale said:
Are we seriously hounding someone cause he likes posts? Jesus, lads.

I've seen Pepper around and I can say he doesn't mean anything within a solar system's reach of malicious with it. And if you think it's annoying, need I remind that Like notifications go away after you click the bell once. They don't stick around like replies and mentions do. This is really a non-issue.
Click to expand...
Yes, it seems harmless.
LordTracer said:
You can also change your preferences so you don’t get Like notifications at all.
Click to expand...
I think that I gave instructions for how to properly adjust that and other forum settings in the following thread long ago:

vsbattles.com

Important user settings information

Hello. Given that this is a new forum, you will all have to properly set up your user settings in the following pages in order to not be spammed by irrelevant notifications and email messages, or to feel like your privacy in the forum is too exposed. https://vsbattles.com/account/preferences...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
 
ImmortalDread said:
@Antvasima we need a announcement message for the rule to be highlighted for some weeks, so members can be aware of it.
Click to expand...
Well, I am honestly not sure how we should currently manage or modify that rule, as it has been useful to avoid spam, but can also drag out necessary revisions from occurring for far too long if other revision threads for a verse get stuck for an extended period of time, for example, and it seems like these were carefully considered suggested revisions, not throwaway spam.

Sensible and constructive suggestions from our staff members would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Antvasima said:
Well, I am honestly not sure how we should currently manage or modify that rule, as it has been useful to avoid spam, but can also drag out necessary revisions from occurring for far too long if other revision threads for a verse get stuck for an extended period of time, for example, and it seems like these were carefully considered suggested revisions, not thRowaway spam.

Sensible and constructive suggestions from our staff members would be appreciated.
Click to expand...
What I meant by, we can simply create an announcement message/board at the top of VS Battle Wiki forum home page (like you do when we announce something, for instance staff promotions).

And we simply add a message or reminder about the rule for a good reasonable of time.

I am not suggesting modification (its fine as it is and I feel every verse get the same treatment fairly)
 
Aachintya31 said:
I only made one and at that time only 2 CRTs were active.
Click to expand...
Then that means you’re not counting the “active” CRTs that were abandoned

Anyways, one punch man is one of the biggest verses on the website, so I think it’s a bit counterproductive to have the 3 crt limit apply considering how much stuff needs to be done. I feel there should be a bit more leniency in this particular case.
 
ZillertheBucko said:
Then that means you’re not counting the “active” CRTs that were abandoned

Anyways, one punch man is one of the biggest verses on the website, so I think it’s a bit counterproductive to have the 3 crt limit apply considering how much stuff needs to be done. I feel there should be a bit more leniency in this particular case.
Click to expand...
I know I'm one of the last people who should be having an opinion this, but I think a member limit would be more productive than a verse wide limit.
There's no reason verses like db, the big 3 and other popular verses should be limited to just 3 crts, considering their fan base both on the wiki, and the sheer amount of forgotten/neglected threads staff would have to close to apply verse wide limits. I'm not a programming expert, but I would imagine it would be easier to apply a hard limit on a member by member basis,with a limit being "You have reached your limit of open threads. Please resolve 1 of them by staff closure or try again in x days."
 
Last edited:
Marshadow29 said:
I know I'm one of the last people who should be having an opinion this, but I think a member limit would be more productive than a very wide limit.
There's no reason verses like db, the big 3 and other popular verses should be limited to just 3 crts, considering their fan base both on the wiki, and the sheer amount of forgotten/neglected threads staff would have to close to apply verse wide limits. I'm not a programming expert, but I would imagine it would be easier to apply a hard limit on a member by member basis,with a limit being "You have reached your limit of open threads. Please resolve 1 of them by staff closure or try again in x days."
Click to expand...
If there are a lot of open threads on the forum that have not been closed yet, it would be challenging to exclude those inactive threads from the hard limit. This is because a hard limit would need to be set in a way that doesn't include those inactive threads, which may require a lot of effort to go through and identify which threads are still open but inactive.

Additionally, closing all inactive threads in an attempt to mitigate the issue I mentioned would also be a significant effort, given the large number of threads on the wiki.
 
Just_a_Random_Butler said:
If there are a lot of open threads on the forum that have not been closed yet, it would be challenging to exclude those inactive threads from the hard limit. This is because a hard limit would need to be set in a way that doesn't include those inactive threads, which may require a lot of effort to go through and identify which threads are still open but inactive.

Additionally, closing all inactive threads in an attempt to mitigate the issue I mentioned would also be a significant effort, given the large number of threads on the wiki.
Click to expand...
I have intermediate programming knowledge at best, so correct me if I'm wrong, but it should be somewhat simple to exclude threads made before a certain time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
10 11 12
Replies
464
Views
31K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Mr. Bambu
Slight Adjustment to Rules Regarding Original Works
Replies
37
Views
3K
Antvasima
Antvasima
  • Locked
Regarding the Rule Violations Report Thread
2
Replies
71
Views
6K
LephyrTheRevanchist
LephyrTheRevanchist
H3110l12345I20
IRL Paper has a profile.
Replies
28
Views
1K
JustANormalLemon
JustANormalLemon
DarkGrath
  • Locked
Proposal for Off-Site Rules Revision
2 3
Replies
93
Views
9K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top