Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ant, not sure but you indeed understood my request, yes? I am not demanding to create a staff forum or change the rule?Again, staff input would be very appreciated. Should one of us create a staff forum thread about our content revision thread limit?
It should ideally be decided in a staff forum thread or in a private discussion between our bureaucrats and administrators though.This discussion ideally should not occur in the RVR.
But no one is really opposing it? I am still perfectly fine for this rule, and I think none as far.We need to decide if we should somehow modify our old standards first. I think they were instated to avoid extreme spam after we reopened our discussion forum after a break for several months.
Also, just a clarification that I agree with the above post, and that it is very nice when our members try to encourage, thank, and be supportive of each other by liking posts. That is what the function is there for in the first place.Are we seriously hounding someone cause he likes posts? Jesus, lads.
I've seen Pepper around and I can say he doesn't mean anything within a solar system's reach of malicious with it. And if you think it's annoying, need I remind that Like notifications go away after you click the bell once. They don't stick around like replies and mentions do. This is really a non-issue.
Sorry for posting here, but it feels like this (and maybe a few other concerns) might have gotten buried under all the talk about CRT Limits and stuffSomeone ban threaded from this thread ( https://vsbattles.com/threads/nasuverse-cosmology-re-evaluation.152965/page-2#post-5721988) and deleted my last comment one more time for absolutely no reason.
I was responding to Deagonx comment by showing that Paul already talked about his last argument and that the word he was trying to change the signification was not possible since they had different kanji.
I've talked to Regidian in private and I drilled into his head that he should be okay to talk if he's pacient and doesn't spam the thread. I'd give him another chance, personally.
This is supposed be in the Profile Deletion request threadYo, I got another profile with issues. Seems to be a new person who made it, and they obviously don't understand profile format, but to me there doesn't seem to be any ill intent here. So they probs only need a mild warning and advising on using the proper format.
Corey cunningham
Attack potency: Atleast wall lvl (was able to crush a skull in one stomp https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPObZ0n7gio 3:27) skull mass = 997.903 g bone density = 1.6 g/cm^3 volume = 997 / 1.6 = 623.689375 cm^3 compression strength of bone = 170 mpa shear strength of bone = 51.6 mpa compressive...vsbattles.fandom.com
Well no because they're also reporting the person that made itThis is supposed be in the Profile Deletion request thread
In the three post, one of them was mine, the second one was for someone that wanted to make a comment but got not autorisation and the third was an answer of your last post that was made after "my" two post. It's show you didn't even read the post lolI spoke with Crimson about it privately on Tuesday and he said this:
Regidian was allowed to post again, and that was when he posted three separate times with very long posts before any of them had been responded to. So I threadbanned him again.
Here you go Crab.Number 1: you can't ping people. You're not staff.
Number 2: necroing isn't the penalty it used to be in ye olden days. Yer gonna have to be more specific than that.
Number 3: related to 2, provide the threads where he's been doing the necroing for review.
Number 4: slightly related to 1, you ain't staff (again). Don't go around giving instructions without at least providing a reason for staff to consider giving instructions in the first place.
i updated the postNumber 1: you can't ping people. You're not staff.
Number 2: necroing isn't the penalty it used to be in ye olden days. Yer gonna have to be more specific than that.
Number 3: related to 2, provide the threads where he's been doing the necroing for review.
Number 4: slightly related to 1, you ain't staff (again). Don't go around giving instructions without at least providing a reason for staff to consider giving instructions in the first place.
I do find this last comment a bit pointless to a thread that there was practically no need to revive nor was there any point in commenting on it.This too.
Though it's not as bad as the others.
Dunno why he doesn't just remake the threads but that's not exactly my business.
I was trying to bring attention to staff projects that never got finished and I believed ought to be. Now, I don't go around bumping regular CRTs unless I'm personally knowledgeable in the verse and can properly contribute because there are so many that it's futile to hope every CRT started will finish, but the staff forum is small enough that properly wrapping up threads that never get finished is at least a manageable task if even one person is around to encourage the project. Strictly speaking, no threads at all need to be finished because VS Battles Wiki is technically just a fun site, not something with any far-reaching implications on our lives, but I genuinely like contributing to major projects here and was trying to at least help this site properly conclude staff discussions, which are a good deal more important that regular threads. If my actions are genuinely problematic in more ways than simply you not liking my thread necromancy, which nobody else has objected to and I would want you to explain, perhaps we could consider a wiki project to go through the staff forum and lock all the threads that discussion determines don't need to be revived, maybe moving their projects to Ant's to-do list, then impose a technical limit on how many staff threads can be open at the same time to permanently negate this issue?@IdiosyncraticLawyer I do think you should, perhaps, cool it with the spam thread revival. It isn't any major offense and this isn't a warning, but for some of these the discussion doesn't need to come back. Just think before you post if the thread hasn't been touched in months.
I was thinking about One by Kathryn Otoshi and was curious to see if the reference was intentional.I do find this last comment a bit pointless to a thread that there was practically no need to revive nor was there any point in commenting on it.
I appreciate that, which is why I heavily disagree with the notion of a warning. But, at the very least, the one about a change to the wiki's color did not, contextually, really need an update three months following the last post.I was trying to bring attention to staff projects that never got finished and I believed ought to be. Now, I don't go around bumping regular CRTs unless I'm personally knowledgeable in the verse and can properly contribute because there are so many that it's futile to hope every CRT started will finish, but the staff forum is small enough that properly wrapping up threads that never get finished is at least a manageable task if even one person is around to encourage the project. Strictly speaking, no threads at all need to be finished because VS Battles Wiki is technically just a fun site, not something with any far-reaching implications on our lives, but I genuinely like contributing to major projects here and was trying to at least help this site properly conclude staff discussions, which are a good deal more important that regular threads. If my actions are genuinely problematic in more ways than simply you not liking my thread necromancy, which nobody else has objected to and I would want you to explain, perhaps we could consider a wiki project to go through the staff forum and lock all the threads that discussion determines don't need to be revived, maybe moving their projects to Ant's to-do list, then impose a technical limit on how many staff threads can be open at the same time to permanently negate this issue?
For the record, given how the staff forum's first page is filled mostly with open threads now, my bumping will be restricted to those threads, for now, to prevent old threads from pushing other old threads out of sight, so I'll at least be stopping temporarily.