• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New profile posts

Lephyr me boy, mind checking out this CRT? It's a rework for a decently small profile and it has universal agreement so far, I just need some more staff

Hello dear mod. If you have a single minute or two to spare, I need your rough stance on something regarding the tiering system standards that's been subject to controversy recently.
So there's been a lot of discussion regarding the standards for higher additional/higher dimensions. Through these two statements from DDT and Ultima, it was established that overarching timelines aren't automatically Low 1-C because spatiotemporal separation doesn't inherently introduce new axes/dimensions of time, and a single time dimension can service a construction of a timeline encompassing a multiverse. With all the debate over technicalities of when overarching timelines could qualify for Low 1-C, I have to summarize my concerns into a simple yes/no question.
Are overarching timelines Low 1-C when there is confirmation for the lesser timelines it encompasses harboring their own time dimensions/axes?
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
Timelines are only Low 1-C if you can prove that there's an Aleph-1/Power Set of Aleph-0 number of them as detailed on the FAQ page

Q: How do cardinal numbers relate to tiering?​

A: Firstly, it should be highlighted that asking about the tier of a cardinal number is effectively a meaningless question when the quantity which it is denoting is not specified in the question as well, and makes as much sense as asking "What tier is the number 8?"

Let's take the smallest infinite cardinal (aleph-0, or ℵ0, the cardinality of countably infinite sets) as an example in this case: A set comprised of a countably infinite number of 0-dimensional points is itself a 0-dimensional space under the usual notions of dimensionality, being thus still infinitely small. Meanwhile, a countably infinite number of planets is High 3-A, a countably infinite number of universes 2-A, and countably infinite dimensions High 1-B.

We then move on to the power set of ℵ0, P(ℵ0), which is an uncountably infinite quantity and represents the set of all the ways in which you can arrange the elements of a set whose cardinality is the former, and is also equal to the size of the set of all real numbers. In terms of points, one can say that everything from 1-dimensional space to (countably) infinite-dimensional space falls under it, as all of these spaces have the same number of elements (coordinates, in this case), in spite of each being infinitely larger than the preceding one by the intuitive notions of size that we regularly utilize (Area, Volume, etc)

On the other hand, an P(ℵ0) number of universes is Low 1-C, and a similar number of spatial dimensions/layers of reality is Low 1-A

However, the same does not necessarily apply when approaching sets of higher cardinalities than this (Such as P(P(ℵ0)), the power set of the power set of aleph-0), as they would be strictly bigger than all of the spaces mentioned above, by all rigorous notions of size, regardless of what their elements are. From this point and onwards, all such sets are Low 1-A at minimum.

Do note, however, that these infinities must specifically refer to elements that physically exist within a verse's cosmology. Them existing as in-universe mathematical concepts is not sufficient for anything to scale to them, unless there is a direct comparision that allows scaling to be made.
ProfectusInfinity
ProfectusInfinity
Thanks for responding. I’m not talking about a multiverse with uncountably infinitely many timelines, I’m talking about higher time dimensions.

Q: How do temporal dimensions impact on tiering?
A: The relationship between the spatial dimensions of a universe and the additional temporal dimension(s) may be visualized as something akin to the frames of a movie placed side-by-side. Basically, the time-like direction may be thought of as a line comprised of uncountably infinite points, each of which is a static "snapshot" of the whole universe at any given moment, with the set of all such events comprising the totality of spacetime.

This structure can then be generalized to any amounts of dimensions, and is also the reason destroying a spacetime continuum is a greater feat than destroying only the contents of the physical universe (Low 2-C, rather than 3-A or High 3-A). So, for example, a spacetime continuum comprising two temporal dimensions (Instead of just one) would have an additional time direction whose "snapshots" correspond to the whole of a 4-dimensional spacetime, and so on and so forth.
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
The application is the same. To get Low 1-C you need to prove that the temporal dimensions (which are presumed to be 4-D) equate to a Power Set of an Aleph-0 or work on a higher dimensional standard.
Hello dear mod. If you have a single minute or two to spare, I need your rough stance on something regarding the tiering system standards that's been subject to controversy recently.
So there's been a lot of discussion regarding the standards for higher additional/higher dimensions. Through these two statements from DDT and yourself, it was established that overarching timelines aren't automatically Low 1-C because spatiotemporal separation doesn't inherently introduce new axes/dimensions of time, and a single time dimension can service a construction of a timeline encompassing a multiverse. With all the debate over technicalities of when overarching timelines could qualify for Low 1-C, I have to summarize my concerns into a simple yes/no question.
Are overarching timelines Low 1-C when there is confirmation for the lesser timelines it encompasses harboring their own time dimensions/axes?
Hello dear mod. If you have a single minute or two to spare, I need your rough stance on something regarding the tiering system standards that's been subject to controversy recently.
So there's been a lot of discussion regarding the standards for higher additional/higher dimensions. Through these two statements from DDT and Ultima, it was established that overarching timelines aren't automatically Low 1-C because spatiotemporal separation doesn't inherently introduce new axes/dimensions of time, and a single time dimension can service a construction of a timeline encompassing a multiverse. With all the debate over technicalities of when overarching timelines could qualify for Low 1-C, I have to summarize my concerns into a simple yes/no question.
Are overarching timelines Low 1-C when there is confirmation for the lesser timelines it encompasses harboring their own time dimensions/axes?
Sry my friend, if I did smth wrong, but one of my friend ask me to make a blog profile for him, so I was just helping him, but if u want I can pause my work
TWILIGHT-OP
TWILIGHT-OP
If u want u can work with him togeather, on gathering feats and scans stuff? On discord gc ?
Arceus0x
Arceus0x
Perhaps
Arceus0x
Arceus0x
If he wants to contact me regarding it, mention it to me, i'll give you my tag.
Hello, can you take a look at it in your free time?

please help me in a upgrade thread i asked so many people please help
Hello, can you take a look at it in your free time?



Greetings Lephyr

I wonder if you've finished your work?

If you are done and you are free, I have written all the answers that confuse you!

It is very, very important for me that you read and comment.

Thank you in advance

Hi, can you look at this if you have time? The discussions are basically over and I only need staff approval, thank you
Hello, can you take a look at it in your free time?

Hello, can you take a look at it in your free time?

Hello, can you take a look at it in your free time?

Hi Jinx666, I was a little wondering if we could use a better looking multiplier for Inazuma Eleven. From the description of Ultimate Thunder, we know that the soccer ball acts as an energy receiver. Therefore, I will give an example: when White Hurricane = 181.80 Teraton of TNT, Zero Magnum formed by the combined power of Shuu and Hakuryuu should be twice as strong, which is equal to 363.6 Teraton of TNT, and we also have additional evidence for explanation. Fire Tornado DD is said to be the combination of two Fire Tornadoes and their power is doubled. What do you think?
Shadow_x007x
Shadow_x007x
That's right, there are a lot of things we can use as multipliers. Even splitting Fei's Dupli could give us a 10 multiplier for him, considering that any Dupli could still compete with Protocol Omega. But since I've been thinking about it, So, does this make Inazuma Eleven a story where the multiplier is too high? That's what I'm not sure about.
Jinx666
Jinx666
Not really. With the unclear power system that is hissatsu, theres very little actual feats to pull from (unlike Hakuryuu's hurricane, not every hissatsu can be taken as literally as they are usually just a visual effect), so multipliers seem to be the only way to go to measure Inazuma's progression. They're similar to Dragon ball's power system in that the characters continuously get stronger via multipliers and power anyway.

We already know by Galaxy that the characters get to at least Solar System through the black hole feat, so as long as multipliers dont get too crazy to that extent, then they'll be fine. The multipliers we use are huge lowballs anyway and sparingly throughout the series.

I wouldn't count Fei's Dupli tbh, Dupli are just duplicates that Fei can remotely control that still act as his power meanwhile Ghost Miximax is literally transferring your own power and energy to your teammates. Fei's issues with Dupli come with remotely controlling and sharing out his strength with them regardless as opposed to giving them power (They are just essentially him). You wouldnt give normal duplication users a power mutliplier just for being able to make duplicates.
Shadow_x007x
Shadow_x007x
Ok, as you said, this is the only way to find Inazuma Eleven's increased results.

I'll try to calculate Doing as many calculations within a subject as possible to facilitate scaling. Because we still lack the proper lift and speed for this. (Although it is difficult to find a Scaling that can be calculated)
98abc532d5c0f4328d1dd828ce58b3fe.jpg
Hi byasura. Are you busy? If you can do so, could you give a feedback (if you want) on this NNT thread, and since it has already received 2 staff, could you apply it to the profile?
Hello, can you take a look at it in your free time?

Hello, can you take a look at it in your free time?

Hello, can you take a look at it in your free time?

Thoughts on Netflix's Nocturne?
Arc7Kuroi
Arc7Kuroi
Yeah, no I don;t like how my favorite part was the Alucard cameo, it felt like anti climax ngl
Phsccarvalho
Phsccarvalho
I waited for the series to come out through alternative sources, and honestly, it's very fast, a bit boring and I can't care about anyone. Besides, every time I looked at Richter's face I imagined a big child.

And wow, how bad I thought the part [spoiler begins] that Annete's friend dies in episode 2, practically in the episode we meet him. I didn't care at all about the character, in fact, when he died I was laughing a lot, and when Annete was crying too. Because besides me not caring about the character because he existed for 1 episode, I found it funny how "dramatic" his death was lol.

Sorry for this big text.
Arc7Kuroi
Arc7Kuroi
No that’s exactly how me and my friend felt, it was like we were jumping into a season 2 where there was supposed to be a season 1 that endeared us to these characters. Literally all Annette’s friend did was sing that goofy tune 😭
please help
DarkGrath
DarkGrath
It's generally easier to get a thread looked at sooner if there is less to evaluate. A large wall of text is not only something that can take a while to evaluate, but someone who is asked to evaluate it would be more likely to put it on the backlog to deal with shorter threads first.

That being said, there's no obligation to change anything at this point.
TheDarkTriadz
TheDarkTriadz
You're a hero 🙏
TheDarkTriadz
TheDarkTriadz
Hey, replied to your reply, take your time replying, just wanted to tell you, sorry
Could you take a look at this
Dont wanna derail the thread, to answer your question on why mario got downgraded. Vsbw dont like multi yet alone uni mario. When outside the forum people do think low multi mario has merit
Back
Top