• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Versus Thread Removal Requests (New forum)

Mr._Bambu said:
I get the notion that I shall be dragged screaming to the thread to form an opinion. Dreadful.
Click to expand...
You could always simply not comment on it. I don't plan on contributing to the thread's redo because I genuinely do not care about the matchup in any capacity.

I am only being a stick in the mud over a flagrant misunderstanding of our rules. If anyone tries to drag me onto the thread itself to argue, I will likely hit them with said muddy stick. I advise wise souls to do the same, and I trust DMUA's judgement on SAO-related matters to handle a redo properly.
 
He's referring to determining the outcome of this dispute, I believe, not voting on the potential rematch thread.
 
Moritzva said:
You could always simply not comment on it. I don't plan on contributing to the thread's redo because I genuinely do not care about the matchup in any capacity.

I am only being a stick in the mud over a flagrant misunderstanding of our rules. If anyone tries to drag me onto the thread itself to argue, I will likely hit them with said muddy stick. I advise wise souls to do the same, and I trust DMUA's judgement on SAO-related matters to handle a redo properly.
Click to expand...
It's not quite that simple, I think. You have asserted multiple times that Deagon is incompetent, and the vote is presently tied regarding removal- a fact that is rapidly devolving into a headache.

I'll try to remember to go through the thread and form an opinion- not of the match result itself, but rather whether I think the arguments are sufficiently justified.
 
Potentially. But I have nothing else to say. DMUA put it well: this thread is not about counting votes. A shit argument with a lot of votes is still a shit argument.

I have paraphrased your stated opinions on our standards here, taken from discord, and you have not addressed them nor disagreed with me across multiple posts. As linked by DMUA, your stated opinions are wrong.
 
Mr._Bambu said:
It's not quite that simple, I think. You have asserted multiple times that Deagon is incompetent, and the vote is presently tied regarding removal- a fact that is rapidly devolving into a headache.

I'll try to remember to go through the thread and form an opinion- not of the match result itself, but rather whether I think the arguments are sufficiently justified.
Click to expand...
I am not saying Deagon is incompetent. I am saying his opinion (which he has not disputed) is incorrect, which it is. For that reason, his vote holds very little weight.

If you want to read the thread and either agree or disagree with me, I have no issue with that. If you think the thread should stay in place, I am willing to step back and wait for more votes. I trust your judgment on the matter, and with that on the table, we should wait for Bambu.
 
Moritzva said:
I have paraphrased your stated opinions on our standards here, taken from discord, and you have not addressed them nor disagreed with me across multiple posts
Click to expand...
Well, yeah, because you're bordering on the web-forum equivalent of foaming at the mouth and I'm trying to avoid any escalation. I don't agree with your description of my opinions, but I'm just really not trying to have an argument here given how strongly you feel. I'm content to leave it in the hands of additional staff. I am confident that if I am so beyond the pale as you claim that they will reach the same conclusion and then this will be settled, so there's no reason to rush it.
 
I agree more with what Mori is saying regarding the vs thread removal thing being valid but I do agree with Bambu that "Objectively incorrect" might have been too blunt of a statement. Everyone's allowed to agree or disagree with a thread removal regardless of reason. Though a better reason may be needed to hold enough weight to determine an outcome however.
 
Deagonx said:
Well, yeah, because you're bordering on the web-forum equivalent of foaming at the mouth and I'm trying to avoid any escalation. I don't agree with your description of my opinions, but I'm just really not trying to have an argument here given how strongly you feel. I'm content to leave it in the hands of additional staff. I am confident that if I am so beyond the pale as you claim that they will reach the same conclusion and then this will be settled, so there's no reason to rush it.
Click to expand...
You can paint it as you'd like, Deagon, you said it to me in front of several people. You, yourself, said that you thought bad reasoning wasn't a good enough reason and that profile changes was the primary reason for the thread. This is not correct, and was explained to you.

If you want to get nit-picky about specifics, you painted it as not wanting versus removal to just be a second round of arguing and debating. When told why Kirito's reasonings were poor, you initially said "that sounds like a reason to vote for Yang, not a reason to remove the thread."

The problem is that rather than ever acknowledging this (which you have not done so far), you insist on dismissing people calling out your behavior as "foaming at the mouth" rather than justifiably pointing out that your personal standards are not indicative of the wiki as a whole.

Because you stand by this point, your vote is hard to take in any sincerity.
 
Okay. Again, I am not interested in debating your description of my sentiments. I am sure other staff can look at the thread, and if your conclusion is as transparent as you suggest, it will be reached by them as well.
 
to be completely fair, what constitutes a "shit" or "bad" argument is pretty subjective, and going out to say such arguments are, in fact, bad, shit and should not be counted is pretty ****** given I'm sure a few of the other voters would disagree on that and might even think the opposing arguments are bad as well, and possibly why they even voted otherwise to begin with.

Idk I kinda get what Deagon is saying, calling a bunch of votes dogshit and voiding them because you don't think they're good enough is way too subjective a reason to delete a matchup given how many actually voted otherwise, like maybe if it was universally agreed they were bad, but that evidently isn't the case and multiple people seem to think they were sufficient. This isn't the same as removing a thread due to an upgrade, downgrade, or new info.

If it is such an issue and the arguments, apparently, are that awful, just redo the thread but this time get a handful of 3rd party dudes to give input after the reasons are given, who couldn't give less of a **** about who wins, to get some unbiased votes if "bias" is allegedly such an issue, that way there's none of this subjective "Well personally I don't think it's good enough so-".

Like at the very least get a few more staff to weigh in before getting trigger happy over, Kirito vs. Yang I guess?
 
Last edited:
Chariot190 said:
If it is such an issue and the arguments, apparently, are that awful, just redo the thread but this time get a handful of 3rd party dudes to give input after the reasons are given,
Click to expand...
This is, indeed, what is being proposed. Removing the thread, and redoing it. Deagon has said he doesn't oppose redoing the thread (which would necessitate removing and replacing it with another verdict) on discord, but has also said in that same breath that he opposes removing it.

I believe we should just redo the thread, like I have already proposed much earlier. People seem to disagree with that. However, I figure we should let Bambu speak his piece first.
 
I'm in favor of the thread's removal. The arguments did not seem very strong at all, and I feel the match is thus due for... well, a rematch. The need for good arguments is made explicitly clear by the Versus Threads page.

And no I will not be participating in said rematch, I dislike both verses and am not interested in debating either
 
As the thread creator I’m honestly in favor of removing it to. I don’t care which way but I already don’t like this back and forth and I probably could come up with stronger arguments (although I won’t participate if there’s a rematch I don’t feel like doing a vs match for a while tbh)
 
Moritzva said:
This is, indeed, what is being proposed. Removing the thread, and redoing it. Deagon has said he doesn't oppose redoing the thread (which would necessitate removing and replacing it with another verdict) on discord, but has also said in that same breath that he opposes removing it.

I believe we should just redo the thread, like I have already proposed much earlier. People seem to disagree with that. However, I figure we should let Bambu speak his piece first.
Click to expand...
imo that's aight. But in that case, wait to remove it till the rematch is done, and just replace it once finished with whatever happens.
because be real, who the **** knows how that match is gonna play out, it could end up being closed without a conclusion for all we know for a multitude of reasons. Better to actually see what happens before jumping the gun.
 
I'm going to ask that the above be the last of the side chatter. This thread can go back to normal operations, I'll go over the thread later and make a ruling. If other evaluating staff wish to tackle the subject, I'd welcome being freed from the inconvenience.
 
CurrySenpai said:
As the thread creator I’m honestly in favor of removing it to. I don’t care which way but I already don’t like this back and forth and I probably could come up with stronger arguments (although I won’t participate if there’s a rematch I don’t feel like doing a vs match for a while tbh)
Click to expand...
I'd like to thank you for being level-headed about this, it does you credit.

With that said, I don't think the thread needs removed. The voting was perhaps overquick but we've no rules against that sort of thing. I had been led to believe that arguments in favor of Kirito were insubstantial or not present at all- this is not the case, early in the thread are a great deal of reasonable arguments that seem to be backed up by the profile itself. Whether I'd agree with the actual outcome of the match is a separate matter- typically, I do presume DMUA to know his shit in regards to SAO, but I cannot nor can anyone give him absolute reign over it and he alone does not decide the Versus Thread outcomes for the verse. As it stands, people seem to have had legitimate reason to vote the way they did, and some continued to defend their position after Weekly and others gave a rebuttal of the opposition.

Votes are based on vague qualifiers like skill margins and tactics in tandem with more concrete elements (dual swords vs dual fists, better analytical prediction, healing spam, etc) tossed in depending on who you're asking. I find this to be a justifiable enough reason to vote presuming no elements make this a stomp that I missed. I cannot guarantee that nobody blindly FRA'd, the practice is miserably common, but in this instance I disagree that everyone did.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
So thats two staff against removal, two staff, four members, and the OP of the thread in favor of removal

So removal it is?
Click to expand...
'fraid not. If other evaluating staff want to weigh in they may, otherwise the thread stays.
 
When you said 2 staff agree with removal, did that include CloverDragon?
 
DDM didn't side concretely one way or the other. If he were to side with Mori, it would return to neutral.
 
Even with a majority, I'd prefer a more glaring majority before moving forward, in this case.

I'll be leaving this case for the time being. Handle it responsibly.

Edit: I am not sure how much credence Calc Group votes are given, but at that point I feel like we are picking at straws. I'd say DMUA is a reputable user that is also knowledgeable on the verse, so his vote should definitely count.
 
May I ask why my posts keep getting deleted each time I comment here?
Like, I can understand not wanting a lot of clutter, but me simply saying that I also agree with the removal to Weekly and not making any further comments isn't worthy of deletion IMO.
This isn't even a Staff Discussion thread and other regular users can comment so I don't know why my posts got singled out.
 
I don't see a reason to count votes aside from what we would otherwise consider evaluating staff, as this is an administrative matter. I'm not overly invested in the outcome of this battle or this particular vote, but I am relieved at the very least that it's clear that my basis for opposing the removal was not as ridiculous as it was made out to be. I am content to defer to later staff votes, such as if DDM takes a firm stance later on or if another staff member looks over the thread and comes to a decision.
 
TheMonkeMan said:
May I ask why my posts keep getting deleted each time I comment here?
Like, I can understand not wanting a lot of clutter, but me simply saying that I also agree with the removal to Weekly and not making any further comments isn't worthy of deletion IMO.
This isn't even a Staff Discussion thread and other regular users can comment so I don't know why my posts got singled out.
Click to expand...
You've already stated as much. It is now clutter to repeatedly restate that. It's a wiki management thread. So, you said your piece a few times now, please let the staff handle it, thank you.
 
I actually never stated that before but yeah, we should definitely drop all the peanut gallery shenanigans and let staff talk, I agree on that.
Just wanted to ask a quick question is all.
 
DaReaperMan said:
Okay and Doom has 2-C shit lol
Click to expand...
True, but since Efi wouldn't let mee change the 3-C to 2-C on Doom's profile it just goes from 3-C to 2-A.

Looking at the Sisters' hax, I'd say they still likely win though both have wincons.

They have Concept Manip/Death Manip and really can't be killed, Doom has mindhax (yes they resist it but Doom's mindhax is tier 1).

But srsly, how is a shooter game like Destiny so utterly busted?
 


Reasons to remove the first fight: An 8-C fighting a 9-B who has a summon that the 8-C can´t see, nor damage, nor sense, that is high 8-C+ and would kill the 8-C in one hit? How is this fair? And is not like the 8-C have range or prior knowledge, he would attack, and Star Platinum would easily counter and one hit kill him

The second: Rock Lee using first Gate would make him 5 times faster and even faster with the fifth, reasons of why Jotaro won? "Time stop is spammable"

It is NOT spammable and Jotaro can´t damage Rock Lee at all (Jotaro scales above 7.8 tons while Rock Lee is 93 tons in first gate, even higher in fifth)

Reasons for both battles: If speed is equalized with a Jojo character, does they get equalized to the user of the stand that is thousands of time slower than their own stand? Because if this is the case, Star platinum would be thousands of time faster that every opponent in this matches, which itself makes the matches a massive stomp
 
Kazuma_kuwabara said:
It is NOT spammable
Click to expand...
It actually is spammable, or at least to way more of a degree than you might think (I'm assuming you're thinking of MIH Arc where Jotaro had to wait a few moments between stops, normally the gaps between aren't as long).
The inability to spam stems from a stamina issue, most notably post-coma because well, he literally died, was frozen, got revived, and became comatose for 4 months where his body and spirit atrophied away to a large degree (That sustainability drop in that arc from an A to an E exists for good reason, bro got nerfed hard).

We actually removed that weakness about 2 years ago, it's only a weakness in Part 6.

Kazuma_kuwabara said:
Because if this is the case, Star platinum would be thousands of time faster that every opponent in this matches, which itself makes the matches a massive stomp
Click to expand...
According to speed rules, apparently, weapons, items, attacks and so on that have a different speed value get lowered by the same relative amount as the main fighter, so yes, Plat does get equalized but he still holds that same relative difference to Jotaro as he usually does.
It is important to note though that Star Platinum can only move within 2 meters of Jotaro.

Its highly limited range offsets its tremendous speed as an actual canonical trade-off (Power-types have short-range explicitly due to having high stats).
Characters that Jotaro faces don't have to worry about getting blitzed unless they get within 2m of him, but at that point, the fact they probably can't see, sense, or harm the invisible ghost man is likely far more problematic than the fact they're likely getting punched a bunch. But for future reference keep that in mind, the threat of getting blitzed by a Stand is only an issue if you enter its AOE, and some Stands actually get slower the further they move away from the user too, all important caveats you can use in the future.

Untitled32_20221214214612.png

Of course, the first one is super unfair and the second one Jotaro gets stat checked regardless so uh, yeah.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

AThe1412
Can you restrict a character's Standard Equipment if it gives them a different tier?
Replies
2
Views
414
TheGreatJedi13
TheGreatJedi13
Planck69
  • Locked
Touhou Thread Rule Removal
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
Planck69
Planck69
ArachDusa
Versus matches for weapons?
Replies
5
Views
1K
XSOULOFCINDERX
XSOULOFCINDERX
ThanatosX
Fullmetal Alchemist General Discussion Thread
Replies
12
Views
870
Mikazzzuchi
Mikazzzuchi
Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
30 31 32
Replies
1K
Views
93K
Vzearr
Vzearr
Back
Top