Touhou Thread Rule Removal

[Ruler_Star_Kuma]

Already felt on the fence to disagree about this, but after reading that.. can put me for disagree

 

[Phsccarvalho]

may have put this in the wrong thread before here but lets ignore that
Message from Fuji, even if it wont change matters
That is all

Topaz, nothing against you but I wouldn't recommend you being such an explicit spokesperson for Fuji (like posting a document written by her with her arguing explicitly). As far as I know this is not allowed and I think a user has already been banned for this (weekly spokesperson).

So be careful.

 

[Topaz404]

Topaz, nothing against you but I wouldn't recommend you being such an explicit spokesperson for Fuji (like posting a document written by her with her arguing explicitly). As far as I know this is not allowed and I think a user has already been banned for this (weekly spokesperson).

So be careful.

Folks ought to know, but ill cease.
truthfully if i was banned i wouldnt care but thats a topic for another time

 

[Ruler_Star_Kuma]

Folks ought to know, but ill cease.
truthfully if i was banned i wouldnt care but thats a topic for another time

I like you being here though (also for the based epic battle fantasy pfp)

 

[Deidalius]

Epic battle fantasy is pretty based.

 

[Deidalius]

Topaz, nothing against you but I wouldn't recommend you being such an explicit spokesperson for Fuji (like posting a document written by her with her arguing explicitly). As far as I know this is not allowed and I think a user has already been banned for this (weekly spokesperson).

So be careful.

If I remember well, back when I was in RVR posting the comments a user that was banned at the time was posting because he was vaguely related to a situation I got told to stop. I don't think he'll get banned or anything if he continues but there's a chance a mod will come in and say "Hey, don't do glorified sock-puppeting with a banned member"

 

[StrymULTRA]

I don't think he'll get banned or anything if he continues but there's a chance a mod will come in and say "Hey, don't do glorified sock-puppeting with a banned member"

This only means that if repeated it is indeed a bannable offense tbf.

 

[Topaz404]

I sholuldnt need to. Everything that needs to be mentioned is on that document, but thats just that.
Dont even think itll change anything tbf

 

[Deidalius]

This only means that if repeated it is indeed a bannable offense tbf.

I think he'll get warned beforehand even if it's repeated.

So as long as Topaz doesn't ignore a mod warning, he'll be fine.

 

[Planck69]

I sholuldnt need to. Everything that needs to be mentioned is on that document, but thats just that.
Dont even think itll change anything tbf

I really don't need to say why posting on behalf of a banned user is frowned upon do I? This is a first time issue so I won't make much of a fuss about it but I'd ask you do not do that again.

 

[Topaz404]

I really don't need to say why posting on behalf of a banned user is frowned upon do I? This is a first time issue so I won't make much of a fuss about it but I'd ask you do not do that again.

I would like to mention that, according to these statements, what im doing isnt really that bad. Its not like im just spamming these out all willy-nilly. Its concise, straight to the point.
://

 

[Planck69]

I would like to mention that, according to these statements, what im doing isnt really that bad. Its not like im just spamming these out all willy-nilly. Its concise, straight to the point.
://

It "not being that bad" is why I'm just saying not to keep doing it and not like, making a report. You've not been punished, it's just a heads up to keep this sort of thing to a minimum.

 

[Topaz404]

It "not being that bad" is why I'm just saying not to keep doing it and not like, making a report. You've not been punished, it's just a heads up to keep this sort of thing to a minimum.

That is what was planned, to just leave the message and then not involve myself any more with this thread. Speaking of that- i will not involve myself further with this thread.
Ill see myself out