- 294
- 191
Already felt on the fence to disagree about this, but after reading that.. can put me for disagree
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Topaz, nothing against you but I wouldn't recommend you being such an explicit spokesperson for Fuji (like posting a document written by her with her arguing explicitly). As far as I know this is not allowed and I think a user has already been banned for this (weekly spokesperson).may have put this in the wrong thread before here but lets ignore that
Message from Fuji, even if it wont change matters
That is all
Folks ought to know, but ill cease.Topaz, nothing against you but I wouldn't recommend you being such an explicit spokesperson for Fuji (like posting a document written by her with her arguing explicitly). As far as I know this is not allowed and I think a user has already been banned for this (weekly spokesperson).
So be careful.
I like you being here thoughFolks ought to know, but ill cease.
truthfully if i was banned i wouldnt care but thats a topic for another time
If I remember well, back when I was in RVR posting the comments a user that was banned at the time was posting because he was vaguely related to a situation I got told to stop. I don't think he'll get banned or anything if he continues but there's a chance a mod will come in and say "Hey, don't do glorified sock-puppeting with a banned member"Topaz, nothing against you but I wouldn't recommend you being such an explicit spokesperson for Fuji (like posting a document written by her with her arguing explicitly). As far as I know this is not allowed and I think a user has already been banned for this (weekly spokesperson).
So be careful.
This only means that if repeated it is indeed a bannable offense tbf.I don't think he'll get banned or anything if he continues but there's a chance a mod will come in and say "Hey, don't do glorified sock-puppeting with a banned member"
I think he'll get warned beforehand even if it's repeated.This only means that if repeated it is indeed a bannable offense tbf.
I really don't need to say why posting on behalf of a banned user is frowned upon do I? This is a first time issue so I won't make much of a fuss about it but I'd ask you do not do that again.I sholuldnt need to. Everything that needs to be mentioned is on that document, but thats just that.
Dont even think itll change anything tbf
I would like to mention that, according to these statements, what im doing isnt really that bad. Its not like im just spamming these out all willy-nilly. Its concise, straight to the point.I really don't need to say why posting on behalf of a banned user is frowned upon do I? This is a first time issue so I won't make much of a fuss about it but I'd ask you do not do that again.
It "not being that bad" is why I'm just saying not to keep doing it and not like, making a report. You've not been punished, it's just a heads up to keep this sort of thing to a minimum.I would like to mention that, according to these statements, what im doing isnt really that bad. Its not like im just spamming these out all willy-nilly. Its concise, straight to the point.
://
That is what was planned, to just leave the message and then not involve myself any more with this thread. Speaking of that- i will not involve myself further with this thread.It "not being that bad" is why I'm just saying not to keep doing it and not like, making a report. You've not been punished, it's just a heads up to keep this sort of thing to a minimum.