- 3,197
- 7,852
Usually, staff overreaching happens if a thread gets too heated and controversial to prevent toxicity. This CRT however, does not yet have any heated arguments so conveying this to the staff discussions isn't entirely necessary.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Tier 1 Dragon Ball Is Finally Here, And Hypertimelines Are Back On The Menu! *Visible Groaning Ensues*
- Thread starter ProfectusInfinity
- Start date
- Status
- 220
- 281
Seems good enough so count me as agree.
- 2,228
- 2,569
We shouldn't discuss who scales right now, we need to actually get this accepted first.
- 5,683
- 3,210
I think it's needed, I mean, after all the OP explanation needs a pruporse and to reveal with detail what he wants to reach exactly... either upgrading the cosomology or characters themselves.
- 2,992
- 1,979
The thread is just for the cosmology.
- 5,683
- 3,210
Ok thanks
- 624
- 1,146
This is probably the most well written explanation I've read of such a complex subject on this site, bravo.
Agreed
Agreed
- 1,974
- 1,578
Agree
- 32,758
- 37,913
No. Threads involving controversial verses and Tier 1 almost never go well by default, adding scaling on top just makes things worse. Much, much worse.
You should 100% focus on cosmology first and then iron out the scaling later. That's the only way you get to keep a successful track record on CRTs like these (Just ask the Marvel Revisions and GoW Revisions).
- 3,106
- 3,175
I concur with KLOL.
Stefano4444
He/Him- 6,084
- 5,155
Inclined to agree but i will wait to see if anyone bring any counterargument.
- 821
- 548
After reading through the OP, i came to a conclusion.
I fortunately tell you all that the OP did infact...cook a 7 star meal. I agree.
I fortunately tell you all that the OP did infact...cook a 7 star meal. I agree.
speedster352
He/Him- 17,224
- 1,745
I agree with the op
- 3,346
- 1,902
- 3,126
- 757
also agree
- 37
- 16
A vote count would be nice I see a lot of agrees and little disagrees.
- 11,220
- 17,425
I don’t think any staff have given a stance though, and those are the votes you really need to get this accepted
- 7,152
- 12,872
I'm going to be removing unneeded comments. Remember that this is not a general discussion thread. If you've already given your agreement and you aren't participating in a discussion, please refrain from making this thread longer than it needs to be.
Da3ggman
He/Him- 2,644
- 1,940
I'm assuming regular users need permission to comment further, correct?
- 11,220
- 17,425
This isn’t a staff discussion thread atm so no, just make sure the comments aren’t derailing
Da3ggman
He/Him- 2,644
- 1,940
Ah, thank you.
- 18,393
- 14,311
I am being completely frank, 3/4 of the entire thread is made of
- Standards
- Ultima Quotes
- DT quotes
- More Standards
- Executor_N0 comments
Whataboutism arguments- And one relevant scan
- 1,051
- 2,411
- Thread starter
- #108
I don’t see the problem with bringing up the standards, it helps to bring everyone onto the same page.
I don’t see the problem with this, for reasons above.
I don’t see the problem with this either, FRA.
I thought I deleted all of that? If there’s anything left in the OP, please point it out to me.
Are you just going to ignore my explanation about the recent standards change, and the two CRT’s I cited in which it was accepted? That was the main point of this post, and I highlighted a disclaimer regarding that.
I feel like you’re being a little disingenuous. You’re not really criticizing the arguments themselves. You’re also hugely misrepresenting this post’s subject matter. I explained why I believe Dragon Ball qualifies for Low 1-C, and went out of my way to emphasize the new evidence. I feel uneasy when you ignore something like that.
- 3,346
- 1,902
he explains how the standards apply to the argument. thats literally the main point of the CRT
- 18,393
- 14,311
You are a bit aggressive, but it is fine. I never said I have any problems with that.
I was not even trying to ignore. Likewise, I am trying to understand, the evidence of low 1-C you are basing it off.
How am I being disingenuous when I am asking which shreds of evidence you are using to suggest low 1-C
- 3,126
- 757
Yeah should prolly put a tldr to where the Low 1-C db stuff is
Serlock_Holmes
He/Him- 3,651
- 1,544
I of course agree. Good work.
- 15,345
- 11,142
@Ultima_Reality @DontTalkDT
This is important, the OP is using quotes from you both and are going by your supposed standards. Is this thread correct in its assessment regarding the cosmology of Dragon Ball being Tier 1 or not?
This is important, the OP is using quotes from you both and are going by your supposed standards. Is this thread correct in its assessment regarding the cosmology of Dragon Ball being Tier 1 or not?
- 18,393
- 14,311
It would be highly advisable to clearly specify the scans you are using as the basis for the low 1-C. This practice aligns with constitutional principles and ensures transparency in the justification process, regardless of whether the proposal is approved or not.
- 1,051
- 2,411
- Thread starter
- #115
The basis is the two minor CRT’s I linked here, which were approved already within the past couple weeks.
- 10,258
- 5,111
Just to clarify, your blog appears to be gone and there is nothing there anymore.
Killerdrone123
He/Him- 1,581
- 1,100
You can find it on db toeiverse cosmology page on wiki
- 18,393
- 14,311
I don't understand.
You are linking two CRTs. One is for tier 2 and has nothing to do with tier 1 (low 1-C) and the other one is for suggesting abilities.
Lastly, you linked the exact scan I mentioned before. So I am right to assume, this is the single scan you are basing off your low 1-C proposal?
So my question still remains:
You are linking two CRTs. One is for tier 2 and has nothing to do with tier 1 (low 1-C) and the other one is for suggesting abilities.
Lastly, you linked the exact scan I mentioned before. So I am right to assume, this is the single scan you are basing off your low 1-C proposal?
So my question still remains:
Before I choose my stance here.
- 1,051
- 2,411
- Thread starter
- #119
Both of the CRT’s are for increasing tier 2 justifications that would allow tier 1.
- 18,393
- 14,311
So,
Could you please provide all the relevant scans we are currently discussing? This will help clarify the specific scan you are referring to, allowing us to avoid any assumptions about your perspective.
Thank you.
Could you please provide all the relevant scans we are currently discussing? This will help clarify the specific scan you are referring to, allowing us to avoid any assumptions about your perspective.
Thank you.
- Status
Similar threads
