- 9,635
- 10,336
- Thread starter
- #41
Agree to disagree.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dragonball: 1-B Timeline
- Thread starter Reiner04
- Start date
- Status
- 2,203
- 1,174
If they are separated spacetimes, they cannot be serviced by a single time dimension.
Their dimensions of time are parallel (they flow in the same direction), but not the same.
Take again the trivial analogy to a 2D plane and 2 parallel lines
- 9,635
- 10,336
- Thread starter
- #43
Well, just so yk, they can. And DB mofos should know it more than anyone how.
- 2,203
- 1,174
If two different spacetimes share their time dimension, then they are not different spacetimes to begin with (unless it is a higher time dimension like the DB timeline case and yada yada), they'd just be two spaces separated
- 2,203
- 1,174
You should at the very least give a counterargument, instead of "So you disagree? Ok, don't care"
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,302
- 3,265
He just knows he's right.
- 9,635
- 10,336
- Thread starter
- #48
Well.. standards. Take it to @DontTalkDT
- 2,203
- 1,174
I'm pretty sure that making this obvious you made this thread in spite of Saint Seiya being upgraded will not lead to good consequences
Anyway, since you're not willing to debate anymore, I'm unfollowing this
Anyway, since you're not willing to debate anymore, I'm unfollowing this
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,302
- 3,265
Saint Seiya hasn't had an accepted upgrade in like 2 years.
- 9,635
- 10,336
- Thread starter
- #51
Lmao, I swear I might one of few guys here on vsbw who don't have badblood with any verse. If evidence is there, they should be upgraded. I am not that invested in "this guy vs that guy" to create threads for reasons like that.
And for your question thar why i'm not debating with u. It goes down to misunderstanding and- not knowing the standard regarding how time axis relating to multiple spacetimes works. Which eventually means I've to not just state the standard but explain it and clear ur doubts. Which is tiresome and I'm not willing to do so. So I just stated standard and left it at that. My apologies.
- 4,125
- 4,834
- 3,286
- 1,256
The Saint Seiya thread is not even concluded. Not to mention the High 1-B thread fell apart.
The final words for staff evaluation: This entire motion is hinged upon the assumption that the use of the words, "time dimension" is synonymous with time axes, despite OP not providing any evidence correlating this context within the work. It is no different than trying to get Tier one for a multiverse with different space dimensions.
The final words for staff evaluation: This entire motion is hinged upon the assumption that the use of the words, "time dimension" is synonymous with time axes, despite OP not providing any evidence correlating this context within the work. It is no different than trying to get Tier one for a multiverse with different space dimensions.
- 1,282
- 961
I have no comment on agreeing or disagreeing with this thread but.....just to note
that's the entire reason DB got tier 1, because each macrocosm has their distinct time dimension rather than sharing one
A 2B verse van share one time dimensions unless otherwise stated
As for this thread, the issue is if having 2c multiverses with their own time dimension counts towards the overall time dimension of the verse or not
No, Dragon ball has proof of distinct time dimensions in each macrocosm, there is a room that creates time for the living world in each universe there
that's the entire reason DB got tier 1, because each macrocosm has their distinct time dimension rather than sharing one
A 2B verse van share one time dimensions unless otherwise stated
As for this thread, the issue is if having 2c multiverses with their own time dimension counts towards the overall time dimension of the verse or not
- 5,465
- 12,469
Parallel temporal dimensions don't actually net Tier 1. Higher temporal dimensions is what does. Same thing as the difference between a 2-dimensional object and two lines that just stand parallel to each other on a 2-D plane.
Hasty12345
Username Only- 4,302
- 3,265
Bad Ultima, don't interrupt the good mood
- 222
- 202
Well here until Ultima is post.
- 10,230
- 5,077
Now that i realize it, different stories generate different flows of time, and each Universe has its own past, present and future, according to what the work has shown and each Universe is like another, so do we also have other rooms that produce more dimensions of time in the Universe?
Neutral, trying to agree with Reiner
Neutral, trying to agree with Reiner
- 19,561
- 15,889
Yeah that's what's confusing the OP. You only need two temporal dimensions to cover the different origins of time, one for the multiverse and one for the universe itself. You wouldn't need 12-13.
DB is considered to have multiple axis because of different temporal orgin points rather than just being a multiverse.
Anyways I disagree with the 1-B upgrade.
- 9,635
- 10,336
- Thread starter
- #62
I might was one of that view, but following around multiple threads and arguments and what current faq states, "multiple temporal dimensions are already assumed to be of unparalleled" unless something contradicts it. Them being parallel, I don't think there was ever such statement.
- 222
- 202
I think it should be closed? Or not
- 9,635
- 10,336
- Thread starter
- #65
- 19,561
- 15,889
Alright
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
