• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
DMUA suggested a recalc, so here's a rough one.

Numbersguy found Nidavallir's beam to be 7.942 meters wide. Aquatic_Pianist found the diameter of the star to be 101.5 times greater than that of the beam.

Radius

7.942*101.5/2=403.0565 meters

Plugging it in

(5.67e-8*1000000^4)*(4*pi*403.0565^2)/49.539*1.14=2.663682e+21 joules or 636.620029 gigatons (Large Island level+)

Uh... oof?
 
You should probably ask even more staff members to help us out here, or we won't get anywhere.
 
@Dante We've had some in the High 6-C - Low 6-B range but yeah it should be in a blog.

Wakanda storm probably wont be much with the storm revisions.
 
The Wakanda storm is around 2.5 megatons if you use CAPE, and assume the maximum instability and cloud height, which would be absurd.
 
I'm cool with Low 6-B, the neutron star feat is obviously lacking and while I tend to not bother much with emissivity if it wouldn't result in damage done to Thor it shouldn't be used. To be clear, though, we do tend to allow watts as a means of counting joules, as a watt is one joule per second.
 
I'm cool with a Low 6-B downgrade.

Disagree with TIer 6 Starlord, it's an outlier. The gravity weapon just pulls you like normal gravity does. That's it.
 
Yeah I know, I kinda just feel like it, otherwise I would have nothing to do because I don't have a life.
 
Eh, not really. I did a very rough recalc using both Numberguy's and Aquatic_Pianist's pixel scaling, but I think it'd be best if someone redid the scaling for both the width of Nidavallir's beam, and the width of the beam compared to Nidavallir.
 
It seems like the Low 6-B revision has been accepted then.
 
I think we should first do a recalc of the neutron star feat first, and then apply the result. The current Low 6-B calcs are dependent on conflicting information, with both using a diameter of 7.942 meters for Nidavallir's beam, while also using a neutron star radius of 656.18 or 753 meters, which is not possible as the radius of the star, scaling from the currently used diameter of the beam, would be 403.0565 meters.
 
Okay. You can ask a few calc group members about it if you wish.
 
I haven't gotten around to it, but if I looked at the scene again, maybe I could get a more reliable number on the size of the star itself
 
Crimson has already agreed to recalc the size of the neutron star, so if you don't want to then you don't have to, but if you do then go ahead I guess. I don't really know what happens in this situation.

Here's a picture of Nidavellir if you need it.
 
You could determine the Star's size by comparing its size to the burst it shoots out, the size of which you have to compare to Thor's first.
 
Oh, yeah

I think I'll let crimson handle it if he can get to it
 
I'm looking at the Neutron Star calc now, the one made by Matthew Schroeder is the one being used correct?

"So, first we ought to figure out Thor's surface area vs the surface area of the ring through which the energy flowed.

Chris Hemsworth is 190.5cm, and according to himself bulks up to 215 lbs whenever he's playing Thor. Applying those numbers into the Body Surface Area calculator, we get an area of 2.26 m┬▓

The ring has an area of 49.53928 m┬▓, as calculated already.

So, what level of energy would the Dyson Sphere drain and channel? Most likely that produced by the star's luminosity. LGM-01, the world's most famous Neutron Star, has a luminosity value of 0.006, which totals 2.2968e24 Joules/s.

Do a basic Rule of Three Calculation, and we discover that Thor was tanking 1.04780853e23 Joules.

Or Large Country level."

The results given only come out as 25.04 Teratons, Country Level.

Unless Matt made a mistake somewhere and the results actually were High 6-B? I know this is getting recalced either way but I'm wondering if the High 6-B results were a mistake to begin with?
 
So the calc is going to need two adjustments based on the size recalc.

First the radius

(5.67e-8*1000000^4)*(4*pi*753^2)/49.539*1.14

Next the total area of the beam

(5.67e-8*1000000^4)*(4*pi*753^2)/49.539*1.14

Radius

355.353/2=177.6765 meters

Beam area

pi*r^2

Beam diameter=3.02

3.02/2=1.51

pi*1.51^2=7.1631454094501 meters^2

Now replacing the original numbers

(5.67e-8*1000000^4)*(4*pi*177.6765^2)/7.1631454094501*1.14=3.5797606361197e+21 joules or 855.562792 gigatons (Large Island level+)


Alternatively, using 600000 Kelvin (average temperature of a neutron star).

(5.67e-8*600000^4)*(4*pi*177.6765^2)/7.1631454094501=4.0696226179045e+20 joules or 97.263981 gigatons (Island level+)

Almost Large Island level
 
Would Captain Marvel still be Low 6-B for tanking Kree ballistic missles? There were some doubts as to whether the missles she tanked were the same as the ones which caused explosions visible from space.
 
So how should we proceed with this?
 
I suppose so, yes.

Thank you for the help.
 
Hang on, I'll just get my Nidavallir size calc accepted. Then I should be able to accept that calculation.
 
@Antvasima

Thanks for your help as well. I know you have a lot to do, so it means a lot that you've stuck around, especially to a guy with a mere 165 edits.
 
Back
Top