• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Saitama fights a goddamn Dragon!!!

It really does feel like people on this site are just trying to make the point that he's not as powerful as we think he is.

Well, cool, message received.
 
saitama doesn't just lack hax, he lacks basic abilities that most characters have. and he's baseline 5-B..... he's gonna lose every. single. time.
 
Reinhardthrowhisspear said:
Hey, first of all, he's above baseline. He clearly one shotted a planet buster. It's just lack of Hax that is problem. Second, calm down man. Don't be so salty about it.
don't even try to act like what i'm saying is wrong. saitama one shotted a planet buster. but that's still barely above baseline. and even if he wasn't baseline, he has zero hax and zero special abilities. my point still stands.

what "Arrogant Schmuck" said is absolutely correct. you guys just want to troll all the OPM fans that think saitama is invincible. but heres the thing, saitama hasn't even used a tiny fraction of his strength yet, so restricting him to only his feats and then making him lose to a bunch of characters is beyond idiotic and doesn't prove a thing. anyways, i'm done here.

go ahead and make fifty other "saitama vs _____ threads", so you guys can add more losses to his profile.
 
I do agree that Saitama is pretty underestimated in the raw strength department. The energy required to not only deflect a planet busting attack but also kill the planet-buster who shot it at you while still holding back is considerably above baseline planet level.
 
i would appreciate it if someone could do an actual proper calculation on saitama one shotting boros. it might save him from more of these cancerous threads.

well, murata actually said that saitamas fight against garou will be much bigger and intense than his fight against boros. so maybe he'll get some more decent feats.
 
Yes, Saitama one-shotted Boros with a serious punch. Yes, he was not using his full strength. However, the mere fact that Boros survived some of his weaker attacks is proof enough that Saitama does indeed have a limit. That limit could be a thousand times stronger than what we currently know about him. It could even be a million, or even a billion. But the fact that he has a limit at all is all that matters, and is what allows him to lose these fights against other 5-Bs.

Would Saitama be stronger than Fatalis? Yes, of course he would. He could probably oneshot it like he oneshotted Boros. However, what we currently know about him right now is most definitely weaker. Plus, Saitama wouldn't go super serious on Fatalis unless he really needed to, which would give Fatalis time to do some damage.

And besides, Dragon Element has durability negation, so it could potentially oneshot Saitama if he allows himself to get hit. He might not be smart, but he's still smart enough to take damage from it in the first place. It's only completely idiotic creatures with no signs of sentience that are immune to the effects of the Dragon Element.
 
what the hell are you talking about? what you just said didn't debunk any of my points at all. my point still stands. these saitama threads are ******* cancerous and a complete waste of time. and whoever makes these threads are honestly just idiotic or just dislikes saitama.
 
yeah i should probably chill, cause i'll probably get banned otherwise lmao. but you guys all know that everything i said here is 100% true. and that's all i care about. until one of you can debunk me, i really have no reason to chill.
 
i'm just waiting for the next moron to make another saitama vs _____ thread and waste everyone's time. OP literally admitted that saitama is the punching bag of this wiki. he knows it and everyone else knows it.
 
AizentheMighty said:
i'm just waiting for the next moron to make another saitama vs _____ thread and waste everyone's time. OP literally admitted that saitama is the punching bag of this wiki. he knows it and everyone else knows it.
or you could likely be a saitama wanker OVO
 
@battlereviews

i didn't say anything that makes me a saitama wanker. a saitama wanker would say some shit like "saitama is a joke character so he can beat anyone" or "saitama has limitless power because ONE said so". but i never said any of that. i simply stated the truth.

this wiki constantly spews out these cancerous saitama threads that are a total waste of time, since everyone knows saitama will lose. the only purpose these threads have is to add more losses to saitama's profile and basically troll OPM fans. which is ******* ********. all i did was point this out, that doesn't make me a saitama wanker
 
i literally said that saitama would lose to pretty much every other 5-B on the site. how does that make me a saitama wanker? a saitama wanker would say the opposite.
 
AizentheMighty said:
i literally said that saitama would lose to pretty much every other 5-B on the site. how does that make me a saitama wanker? a saitama wanker would say the opposite.
sorry, i meant downplayer
 
AizentheMighty said:
i literally said that saitama would lose to pretty much every other 5-B on the site. how does that make me a saitama wanker? a saitama wanker would say the opposite.
Saitama did beat a 5-B character without speed being equalized
 
Tbf, in canon he beat a 5-B who could regen from being blown apart and who had energy attacks.

He then beat another 5-B with nearly as good regen and reactive evolution.

Though people seem to just kinda ignore that.
 
Azathoth the Abyssal Idiot said:
Tbf, in canon he beat a 5-B who could regen from being blown apart and who had energy attacks.
He then beat another 5-B with nearly as good regen and reactive evolution.

Though people seem to just kinda ignore that.
i am basically someone who doesnt look at those factors, unless i know the character well, otherwise, i will be judging by stats,
 
Huesito88 said:
Boros could've beat Saitama if he aimed a little more to the left or right
what the **** are you talking about? murata literally said that even if saitama didnt land on the moon, he could have returned back to earth, but it was a really stupid reason im not gonna lie.

and do you have proof that saitama would die if he didnt land on the moon? dont jump to conclusions like that ffs.
 
what did Murata say? (Source plz) what conclusions am I jumping at? But now that I think about it, he could probably could have propelled himself back using his punches
 
WoG can't be trusted sometimes. He never shown feats anything like that or near that feat. And why are we even arguing about this? If you wanna upgrade him go to CRT. Not here.
 
I'm talking to Aizen. Sorry. Writer can't be trusted as seen in any DC writer wanking Superman-Prime so much.
 
Huesito88 said:
Boros could've beat Saitama if he aimed a little more to the left or right
Ahahahaha...

Um, ahaha...ha...

No? I mean, are you kidding? He'd litterally find some Plot Space Rock to land on, and jump back to Earth cause of Parody Armor and shit. Boros wouldnt've made a difference there, even if he made a detour.
 
Huesito88 said:
what did Murata say? (Source plz) what conclusions am I jumping at? But now that I think about it, he could probably could have propelled himself back using his punches
 
So like what do we even do with this thread now?

Do we count it as White Fatalis's win because I think he still has the proper amount of votes (though I could be wrong about that at this point) or what?
 
Back
Top