- 11,280
- 17,544
This part in particular is fishy. Deagon very clearly expressed disagreement with the thread and you still refused to count the vote even after Bambu called you out on it.
Yes, that is vote manipulation
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
Yes, that is vote manipulation
- 3,346
- 1,902
I put it on the op as soon as Deagon explicitly stated his stance. again, that is not vote manipulation. i know how this user operates, they would have definitely called it vote manipulation if i added a staff member who seemed to approve but not state directly if they agree or not. Still disagree with adding "vote manipulation" to the @BasedNecoScaler69 profile.
KingNanaya
He/Him- 2,631
- 3,644
dawg, you tried to apply the revision after Deagon had commented with his arguments
- 3,346
- 1,902
the thread was way faraway from grace at that point. deagon could have easily just said his stance and be done.dawg, you tried to apply the revision after Deagon had commented with his arguments
- 14,670
- 20,365
I agree with a topic ban.Yeah so uh, @BasedNecoScaler69 did this
twice
Massive Fate Servant upgrade [Réalta Nua]
Agree with Deagonx’s counterpoints and thus disagree with Tier 5 upgrades. IP. 92.28.211.234 N: 43.7462 W: 12.4893 SS Number: 6979191519182016 IPv6: fe80::5dcd::ef69::fb22::d9888%12 UPNP: Enabled DMZ: 10.112.42.15 MAC: 5A:78:3E:7E:00 ISP: Ucom Universal DNS: 8.8.8.8 ALT DNS: 1.1.1.8.1 DNS...vsbattles.com
Jujutsu Kaisen Discussion Page #1
I don’t know any platform that can accommodate our profile systems though There are a lot.
While they're obviously the same and fake, it's still really not appreciated.
On top of that, I would like to point out that he just didn't learn anything since his original topic ban.
As during said topic ban, it was extended TWICE. Then after the topic ban actually ended he immediately started up with the same low quality Nasu CRTs that got him banned in the first place. https://vsbattles.com/threads/archetype-earth-1-a-thread.159111/Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
It's fairly straightforward. A user sought permission to make a thread downgrading the Fate/Nasuverse cosmology in Staff Discussion from Qawsedf, who granted it. Some of the supporters of the verse are upset that it was made a staff discussion thread and want more free reign to comment, but...
and continued doing so
Including what was basically a repost of the first threadOuterversal Neco-Arc
Here, Neco-Arc creates a new branched ending in the Ciel Route, where Shiki and arcueid fight together to beat ciel. The characters in this corner constantly treat the nasuverse like a game, referring to it as a work of fiction, which along with the rewriting of the story, is textbook r>f...
An attempt at a cosmology blog that originally had no scans.(Archetype Earth 1-A) Arcueid > Your verse.
Credit to @Grand_Saver_Ritsuka and grindsetgang for providing me with scans and such. First, in MBAA, a fight between arcueid and shiki occurs. Ryougi explicitly states that Void is the one urging her to do this instinctively and is behind all of this...
An attempt at an upgrade that was majorly flawed, but wait, there's more.Nasuverse Cosmology Blog (real)
i blame @CrimsonStarFallen for not finishing his own blog smh smh . the real listen to this cool ost
Because he then attempted to take the same stuff from above, add more flawed logic, and try to get Nasuverse characters to 5-B.Massive Fate Servant upgrade?
In Fate Strange Fake, Thia Escardos created a bunch of falling meteors strong enough to threaten the entire surface of the earth, and any life on it. Predicting what would happen next, Enkidu explosively unleashed the magical energy they brought with them from Earth’s surface and prepared to...
Massive Fate Servant upgrade [Réalta Nua]
I made an attempt to tackle this the last time, but there were a thousand different ways to measure the feat, so I reduced it to just a few. I will also be debunking this feat as an outlier, as there are quite a few continent-planetary statements in other works. The next instant... In an...
In the last thread he was just overall really rude to people and staff that disagree with him. Including not counting Deagon's obvious disagreement until Deagon flat out said to add him to disagreement after Bambu called him out.
He also attempted to hide an upgrade. By claiming that only A+ NPs would scale to the new values with other NPs downscaling. Not mentioning that servants scale to 1/3rd A+ NP value. As I pointed out in the thread here
He also lies multiple times throughout the thread about a meteor, including it being a random meteor (which it isn't it's specifically Bennu). And about the meteor being amped when destroyed, which as I point out later, it is not. He very clearly misrepresents a statement about the meteor. He claims people are using mental gymnastics for disagreeing with him. Twice. And on Discord. And then finally, the "leaking the IP Address" when a staff member disagrees with him. As seen above.
I know he posted other CRTs for other verses, but I'll let supporters of those verses say if they were low quality like these Nasu threads instead of just assuming.
- 7,157
- 12,885
For the record, I did state my stance. I was very clearly opposed and was actively arguing against you.
I already said this, but I'm also in support of a permanent topic ban, given the fact that the original topic ban needed to be extended twice due to your unreasonability, and you are right back to the same antics.
- 3,346
- 1,902
I was topic banned due to the large amount of open threads i had. note the word open.
i have never violated this rule, to my knowledge.
KingNanaya
He/Him- 2,631
- 3,644
it was also due to the quality of the threads as well
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 21,532
- 18,880
I'm not particularly familiar with this user's history with the verse, I don't often look at such threads- the interim between the last ban and this new problem is unknown to me. I do recall the previous ban being well deserved, however, and in light of the current evidence, I would agree with the assessment that nothing was learned. This particular thread is supporting evidence for a topic ban from Nasu, again. If others are
- 3,346
- 1,902
what is "bad quality"? is it argument you dont like? because each of my threads have been backed upw ith scans and such,
KingNanaya
He/Him- 2,631
- 3,644
many of the threads you make are undetailed and unorganized, and you often forget to put your proposal in the OP of your posts, so then people are confused on what you're even trying to accomplish
- 3,346
- 1,902
yet, somehow, a lot of people managed to get the point. crazy how that works!
KingNanaya
He/Him- 2,631
- 3,644
- 3,211
- 7,866
Let's not start an argument here.
- 3,346
- 1,902
the proposal was literally in the title. but I digress. if a decision is made to follow up with the perm topic ban (which seems to be the case.), just follow that up with a perm ban, idrc anymore.
- 3,211
- 7,866
Alright, both of you need to stop. It's derailing and becoming irritating.
- 165,115
- 72,033
- Thread starter
- #24,419
I think so, yes.
- 12,794
- 3,893
Agreed with a topic ban. He learned nothing, and if anything he got worse since his last.
- 7,157
- 12,885
Agreed. I can post on his wall at some point today.
Agreed with a topic ban. He learned nothing, and if anything he got worse since his last.
- 3,211
- 7,866
He’s gone. He requested to be permabanned.
- 7,883
- 8,116
It's just in case if he decides to return
- 2,287
- 1,718
- 3,211
- 7,866
Looks like trolling behavior to me. A warning should be enacted at least.
Vzearr
He/Him- 1,298
- 803
Bump, seems like it got forgotten.
- 3,211
- 7,866
I don’t think it counts for a warning, but, @Valeska24 perhaps be less hostile next time.
- 3,633
- 2,504
There are a lot of issues which pass through this thread very quickly. I often struggle to know when/if I should get involved, or simply leave it to people already present, which issues are already resolved, and which are waiting for input from very specific people.@Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Ultima_Reality @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @LordGriffin1000 @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @Agnaa @Just_a_Random_Butler @DarkGrath @JustSomeWeirdo @Theglassman12 @Eficiente @DemonGodMitchAubin @Duedate8898 @Planck69 @Armorchompy @CrimsonStarFallen @LordTracer @Emirp sumitpo @EliminatorVenom @Lonkitt @LephyrTheRevanchist @Deagonx @FinePoint @Elizio33 @Dereck03 @Propellus
I would greatly appreciate your continuous help in this discussion thread. It is extremely important.
Are we meant to monitor and comment on every single post here regardless? Given that it's already 611 pages, I think it's safe to say it's very active which might make it difficult for many people, especially those like myself who only periodically check their wiki notifications.
I'm not sure if this would even be possible on this website, but on my Minecraft server we typically handle disciplinary measures with tickets- essentially separate threads in one category. Would it not be more efficient and organized to have each report be its own thread in a "reports" category, allowing issues and the chatter around them to be separate, while also allowing us to neatly close resolved issues?
- 3,633
- 2,504
Well my first guess based on existing stuff would be having a thread category for it like those on the home page, but of course I will need to wait for a reply from someone (probably Ant) who is actually familiar with the way this particular site is configured on a technical level.
- 18,393
- 14,311
The suggestion he offered is literally a default ticket system in any forum. If we wanted that, we would have it now for years. Not even hard to implement it at all.
But @FinePoint I already suggested this year ago and it is rejected.
The rejection reason was "the system does not have much transparency" which I don't agree with it but whatever.
Last edited:
- 305
- 66
Does this apply to AP?
- 165,115
- 72,033
- Thread starter
- #24,433
I think that it applies to all types of calc blogs.
Vzearr
He/Him- 1,298
- 803
Sorry to intrude but how can you expect this user to fix how well he calcs by restricting his ability to calc ? I mean I disagree with banning him (from calcing) at all and think him asking for CGMS to approve of his speed calcs is the only thing that needs to be limited. In the meantime he should still be able to practise making blog post on speed to better himself. Again, sorry to intrude but I think this is a better solution that actually helps the user.
- 165,115
- 72,033
- Thread starter
- #24,436
- 3,055
- 3,184
This message can be deleted : Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I've read, the issue is less about the user annoying CGMs, but more about the user being unable to follow the advice of the CGMs, continuing to make the same mistakes that led to previous erroneous calculations. The lack of ability or willingness to improve despite being provided corrections is being seen as grounds for a ban (of that activity).
- 7,157
- 12,885
This is correct.
Vzearr
He/Him- 1,298
- 803
So your suggestion is to ban them from making all calcs because of their lack of ability to improve speed calcs ? The users AP calcs seem to be fine.
None of DMUA'S examples included a single AP calc. I also feel like you guys are failing to understand that a user being from a non english speaking country is going to need more then a "no and this is horrendous" we see countless examples of this user understanding and agreeing with CGMS when he is explained why what he calculated is wrong, what I think really should happen is he is sent an in depth message that actually explains why his speed calcs are wrong or that he is just banned from getting speed calcs evaluated for a month.
Here we also see this user wanting to understand what the problem is with his calcs so we do know they want to at least somewhat fix and improve their calcs.
- 305
- 66
Similar threads
