Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nevertheless, it should be noted that the original warning from @DarkDragonMedeus was a light, verbal warning and to be precise, it is worth mentioning that he also stated that his language was not directed at any individual in a derogatory or profane manner.
I'd say that's rather lighter than the other stuff he's said, all things considered."You suck and make me wanna die" -Coomandar 2022
They also went on a nonsensical rant and when they got told to just to chill out, they responded by saying "you are way too sensitive".
The three strike system isn't always the precedent we operate by, especially when a user is constantly agitating towards other users for no discernible reason. In this case, corroboration from both normal members and staff is enough for a short ban me thinks. It's not like pwning the guy over it.I would request that the individual in question be contacted (pinged here) and given an opportunity to provide a defense of their actions. To the best of my knowledge, this individual has not received any official warning in the past. Therefore, imposing a ban as a punishment would be considered severe and excessive. It would be more appropriate to consider alternative forms of disciplinary action that are proportionate to the infraction.
I must respectfully correct your statement, the individual in question did not respond to the comment asking them to “chill out”, they commented on a subsequent response. I would kindly request that all members ensure that they provide complete and accurate information, to avoid any confusion or misinformation.They also went on a nonsensical rant and when they got told to just to chill out, they responded by saying "you are way too sensitive".
Dread, I don't think we need to get caught up in semantics here. Man was making a point, he doesn't need to be fully, exhaustively comprehensive in it, so long as he provides the thread for us to judge on our own.I must respectfully correct your statement, the individual in question did not respond to the comment asking them to “chill out”, they commented on a subsequent response. I would kindly request that all members ensure that they provide complete and accurate information, to avoid any confusion or misinformation.
I respectfully disagree with the proposed course of action, as it seems to be a severe punishment, particularly in light of the fact that the individual in question may not have been aware that they were being reported.The three strike system isn't always the precedent we operate by, especially when a user is constantly agitating towards other users for no discernible reason. In this case, corroboration from both normal members and staff is enough for a short ban me thinks. It's not like pwning the guy over it.
I acknowledge your point, but I would like to emphasize the importance of providing a clear and detailed account of the situation for other staff members to review. In my opinion, it is essential to be precise when submitting a report or providing evidence, as this ensures that all relevant information is taken into consideration when evaluating the situation.Dread, I don't think we need to get caught up in semantics here. Man was making a point, he doesn't need to be fully, exhaustively comprehensive in it, so long as he provides the thread for us to judge on our own.
I understand what you're trying to say, but if staff members have judged a user sufficiently disruptive in a certain amount of time and after a certain amount of supporting evidence, we reserve the right to hand out a short ban. And all staff votes are leaning towards that.I respectfully disagree with the proposed course of action, as it seems to be a severe punishment, particularly in light of the fact that the individual in question may not have been aware that they were being reported.
I suggest that an official warning be issued, requesting that the individual in question modulate their tone. It is worth noting that this is not the first instance of this behavior, but it should also be acknowledged that the individual has not yet received an official warning.
It is authoritative to keep in mind that after receiving a warning, the individual may exhibit a more cooperative attitude and work with staff members to address the issue. Based on my observation of the individual's messages, it appears that they possess both semi-toxic and productive traits.
The goal should be to lower their tone without completely discouraging their contributions.
I respectfully request that any available evidence be provided to support the claim made by OP. It is important to note that while personal endorsement may provide some level of credibility, it is not a substitute for concrete evidence, which is essential for the validation of the argument.
If he also did not read the wiki basic information that he should not be throwing around insults, then I really agree to that short ban, alternatively he can also get short banned from the OPM general discussion and OPM threads since that is where he insults the most, maybe a 2-week thread ban should help get him straight.you are brainless, if you dont want to read the wiki basic informations, not my fault
Idk..Why is he so pissed at the Ziller guy?