- 14,432
- 4,487
I got no idea if this is a rule violation, but this person on the wiki (not the forum) keeps editing random people's profiles to list their name (including mines) before reverting their edits
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Posted it to his wall. Monitor him in the meantime. If he does not relent, a ban is in order.The person oughta have a warning for editing other people's user pages without permission
I dont see any admins active to actually help out in this so I'll block him for 1 month for the time being to avoid him continue editing other users pages as it's pretty rude and he also ignored an official warning.And I see he's been doing this again onto someone else's page without their permission despite a warning, looks like a ban is warranted for this
I agree, editing other users' profiles without permission is vandalism on a personal level for a lot of people.Agree with Deceived, except I think the ban should straight up be permanent. This guy is an obvious troll.
There is no administrator who is active to help here so. Due to the constant vandalism on the profiles I have blocked him for 3 months to avoid even more vandalism. I thought about giving him a warning but he had already vandalized more profiles. I leave it up to the administrators to decide what to do with it.This user has vandalized a plethora of JJK profiles, adding statistics which aren't accepted while also messing up the formatting for the tiers, they've vandalized Gojo's profile, I've undid their edits but they're still vandalizing multiple other JJK profiles.
I'll undo those edits right now if someone hasn't already done so.
Edit: I've undid the edits on Yuta Okkotsu's profile while @PsychoWarper undid the edits on Yuki Tsukumo's profile.
Edit 2: They've just vandalized Suguru Geto's profile, I've undid the edits.
Thank you for helping out.There is no administrator who is active to help here so. Due to the constant vandalism on the profiles I have blocked him for 3 months to avoid even more vandalism. I thought about giving him a warning but he had already vandalized more profiles. I leave it up to the administrators to decide what to do with it.
Yes, I think so too, since the edits were not vandalism as such but changes that you might think would make sense but that's not the way we do things.Thank you for helping out.
Since that particular new member seemed more clueless than malicious, I think that 3 months is probably a sufficient punishment, and I also left the member in question a warning.
George Arthur884
vsbattles.fandom.com
Reverted
Yeah it seems completely unnecessary considering ziller hadn't came remotely close to the way Coomander was talking to him with the stuff he said, I warned him but staff may need to say something if they feel it necessary
I can confirm he would always do things like this in the One Punch Man General thread, it's annoying.Reporting @Coomandar for being very rude to @ZillertheBucko. This isn't the first time @Coomandar has been rude to someone or insulted them, and they have been warned many times over it
If Ziller got banned for a month for stuff like this, I think it's only fair to do the same thing with Coomandar, as he's much worse than Ziller.I can confirm he would always do things like this in the One Punch Man General thread, it's annoying.
I can confirm he would always do things like this in the One Punch Man General thread, it's annoying.
I respectfully request that any available evidence be provided to support the claim made by OP. It is important to note that while personal endorsement may provide some level of credibility, it is not a substitute for concrete evidence, which is essential for the validation of the argument.If Ziller got banned for a month for stuff like this, I think it's only fair to do the same thing with Coomandar, as he's much worse than Ziller.
Like 60% of Coom's posts are toxic.
Perhaps a month?It seems like a block is warranted if he continuously behaves like this. For how long would be appropriate?