Braking
He/Him- 3,801
- 2,210
yea but not like for trying to insult people or being rude.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
Coolboy6
He/Him- 7,434
- 6,005
Exactly
- 2,317
- 1,083
NOT INsulting people
- 4,277
- 2,798
For god's sake bring this to your walls and stop cluttering this up.
- 24,414
- 25,400
Jamesthetaker
He/Him- 6,713
- 1,828
This user vandalized Raiden page.
azontr
He/Him- 39,895
- 49,851
Same guy above vandalized this page.
Reverted the edits.
He also did it here.
I've already reverted the edits.
Reverted the edits.
He also did it here.
I've already reverted the edits.
- 8,997
- 9,713
azontr
He/Him- 39,895
- 49,851
Gotta step up you're game lol. Thanks, Ant.
- 165,692
- 73,420
- Thread starter
- #8,172
I blocked him permanently, and reverted all of his other edits. He received a warning previously, and did not listen to it.
azontr
He/Him- 39,895
- 49,851
- 165,692
- 73,420
- Thread starter
- #8,174
No problem.
- 24,414
- 25,400
This user vandalised this profile
- 21,235
- 30,267
Other staff can probably see this deleted message, so yeah.
Requesting a ridiculously long term ban or anything else (preferably a perma ban) for @Child from his/her consistent actions since they've joined the wiki. I'm not supporting anything under a ban at this point.
And I swear on my life if you come in this rvr and badmouth me, you're getting thread banned and you won't have a say in your evaluation on if you should stay or not on this wiki.
When they first joined they started off with small smart remarks which evolved into annoyance.
Then they say this
Surprised they knew what the RVR and Questions and Answers was on their first thread on the wiki, but w/e. The latter was the 4th message they've ever stated, so knowing what the rvr was is unusual.
Then these messages came up
From the superiority complex and being a potential sock and using phrasing from a recently banned member, plus making their profile and immediately spiting a verse and badmouthing the supporters in less than the span of a week and knowing the wiki's terms in less than a week. They should get banned. I'll personally advocate for a permanent one.
Then they had the nerve to call me "KingDumbest" in the deleted message I sent far above.
And everyone here knows I hate banning people, so it says a lot that I want him banned.
Even the people who agreed with him in threads tell him to relax.
He's gotten warnings from Bambu on the threads to chill out and he's left smart final remarks.
Ban away
Requesting a ridiculously long term ban or anything else (preferably a perma ban) for @Child from his/her consistent actions since they've joined the wiki. I'm not supporting anything under a ban at this point.
And I swear on my life if you come in this rvr and badmouth me, you're getting thread banned and you won't have a say in your evaluation on if you should stay or not on this wiki.
When they first joined they started off with small smart remarks which evolved into annoyance.
Then they say this
Surprised they knew what the RVR and Questions and Answers was on their first thread on the wiki, but w/e. The latter was the 4th message they've ever stated, so knowing what the rvr was is unusual.
Then these messages came up
From the superiority complex and being a potential sock and using phrasing from a recently banned member, plus making their profile and immediately spiting a verse and badmouthing the supporters in less than the span of a week and knowing the wiki's terms in less than a week. They should get banned. I'll personally advocate for a permanent one.
Then they had the nerve to call me "KingDumbest" in the deleted message I sent far above.
And everyone here knows I hate banning people, so it says a lot that I want him banned.
Even the people who agreed with him in threads tell him to relax.
He's gotten warnings from Bambu on the threads to chill out and he's left smart final remarks.
Ban away
- 40,940
- 35,399
Yeah, I've had issues with them myself, I managed to restrain myself from entering a flame war.
Permanent ban away.
Permanent ban away.
- 30,319
- 25,760
I have no objections to a perma-ban.
- 21,235
- 30,267
People think it's a sock of @UeTa, but me and her are on good terms so I doubt it
But from their knowledge of the wiki's standards and such, probably a sock
Eminiteable
He/Him- 7,389
- 6,605
Seen people in threads speculate it's a @UeTa sock, at the moment it seems to just be speculation though based off behaviour.
- 2,317
- 1,083
who a ueta?
azontr
He/Him- 39,895
- 49,851
Previously banned user, let's not derail with talking about them.
- 2,317
- 1,083
tell me in dms then
azontr
He/Him- 39,895
- 49,851
No. They are a banned user, leave it at that.
- 2,317
- 1,083
- 165,692
- 73,420
- Thread starter
- #8,190
I don't mind if somebody permanently bans the member in question, although the wiki account will be hard to find, since I strongly doubt that it matches the username used here in this particular case.
- 40,940
- 35,399
Can't you as a Bureaucrat check what their wiki account name is?
- 165,692
- 73,420
- Thread starter
- #8,193
No, it is supposed to match what they use here, but "Child" seems too common (likely to have been used by somebody else in Fandom long ago) for that to work.
- 40,940
- 35,399
That uh... that sounds like something to change chief. High authority figures like yourself should have the reign to find their wiki account one way or another
- 21,235
- 30,267
- 40,940
- 35,399
I know, but it should be easier to find in case trolls/socks name themselves really common names in the future.
- 165,692
- 73,420
- Thread starter
- #8,197
Well, Medeus and AKM are checking if all new accounts that sign up to this forum, and that have not automatically connected their wiki accounts via Discord, have a matching Fandom username, but in this case there seems to have been some kind of glitch.
- 40,940
- 35,399
Gotcha.
- 30,404
- 32,246
I do remember the name popping up in the approval quene, and that there was a legit Fandom account. And I can't really see when account was created anymore, but it appears to have 0 contributions. So it would be weird if it was made years ago and only recently came back to be active here. I have also blocked the main account.
And as for suspicions, I agree we don't have conclusive proof of being a sock, but her main account "Being cool with you" doesn't automatically clear them of all charges. A lot of people can act friendly on their main account while being extremely hostile on other accounts; a certain other female user infamous for abusing hundreds of socks has made similar tactics. Not going to jump the gun and say it's UeTa, but I would perhaps suggest keeping an extra close eye on her.
And as for suspicions, I agree we don't have conclusive proof of being a sock, but her main account "Being cool with you" doesn't automatically clear them of all charges. A lot of people can act friendly on their main account while being extremely hostile on other accounts; a certain other female user infamous for abusing hundreds of socks has made similar tactics. Not going to jump the gun and say it's UeTa, but I would perhaps suggest keeping an extra close eye on her.
Similar threads
