- 663
- 551
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Regular members are allowed to revert edits if the profiles were vandalized, so you did nothing wrong.I fixed the vandalism, don't know if that's in my right to.
one. the latter thread was half joking, half serious. second: list where i used NLFs. third: the first user i reported kept talking about cunny- which is child genitalia- and sent images of illustrated child **** in nsfw channels and suggestive pictures of said illustrated children in sfw channels.He keeps spamming questions and answers threads left and right which some just sound very outlandish and all over the place; like the Low 1-C Goku one and stuff like this. Which all I really have to say ask for the latter is "Why?" Not only that, but he also spams a lot on a lot of threads while abusing NLFs and other obnoxious practices. And he excessively abuses the report button over things that aren't even report worthy at all. I have literally seen this multiple times of just randomly calling people "Pedophiles" for no reason. I know the last example was over someone saying they're a "Lolicon." Which I'm not interested to really talk about them other than it just being art. But calling people pedophiles is a serious allegation people need hard evidence that they're predators out for actual minors and not some people who are in to some weird art style.
I wasn't using NLFs, i don't know what you're talking about. I will say that the thread was unclear on my opinion (i want BOG to be Low 2-C instead of 3-A so Goku doesn't LEAP DIMENSIONS)How about the entirety of the Low 1-C Goku thread for your NLFs. Straight up ignoring a warning is enough to get you banned.
Alright, you got me! But what rule does that break?Ngl, you can’t really claim you were ‘half-joking’ when the OP says ‘I am not joking’.
Uncountable infinitely stronger. Which is the difference between R^4 and R^5.NLF i also vouch for, he kept saying stuff about about a 5-D goku transformation because "he is infinite times stronger"
Please do not bring you're arguments for 5-D Goku here. Like, please.Uncountable infinitely stronger. Which is the difference between R^4 and R^5.
Please do not strawman.
Way to extreme. Unless his false pedophile allegations shit is proven true, nothing near a ban is warranted.Someone ban this guy if he’s gonna keep saying shit like this
He harmed a Low 2-C, what do you want to do?I wasn't using NLFs, i don't know what you're talking about. I will say that the thread was unclear on my opinion (i want BOG to be Low 2-C instead of 3-A so Goku doesn't LEAP DIMENSIONS)
Alright, you got me! But what rule does that break?
ill say this one moreUncountable infinitely stronger. Which is the difference between R^4 and R^5.
either upgrade everyone from that point on to Low 1-C or upgrade BOG to Low 2-C so we don't get DIMENSION HOPPING GOKU WOOOOOHe harmed a Low 2-C, what do you want to do?
ill say this one more
being uncoutble infinite time stronger than someone doesn't make their power higher dimensional
it makes them higher into the tier. Thats NLF at its finest. A 2-C can be countable infinite time stronger than another 2-C whos 4-D and still be 2-C. just becasue someone stronger doesn't make their tier higher than the other.
He was warned once, and is now cluttering this thread up with his “arguments.” So yeah, he should get bannedWay to extreme. Unless his false pedophile allegations shit is proven true, nothing near a ban is warranted.
Guess ****** what, all transformations aren't the ****** same, and that transformation has ****** proof of harming a Low 2-C, there ain't proof of ****** Low 1-C besides NLFs.either upgrade everyone from that point on to Low 1-C or upgrade BOG to Low 2-C so we don't get DIMENSION HOPPING GOKU WOOOOO
I'm making a CRT right now in fact
Well, it's either Low 1-C (bad) or BoG Low 2-C (good)Guess ****** what, all transformations aren't the ****** same, and that transformation has ****** proof of harming a Low 2-C, there ain't proof of ****** Low 1-C besides NLFs.
He's been here since June 2nd. I think that excuse is off the table.He's probably just a Kid. He probably just doesn't understand
I'll be awaiting you're CRT, but don't bring said CRT here, please and thank you.Well, it's either Low 1-C (bad) or BoG Low 2-C (good)
you can tell which one I support
now wait for the CRT, that will be less vague
Alright! Although I can't actually post if i get banned.I'll be awaiting you're CRT, but don't bring said CRT here, please and thank you.
I can get why you might get annoyed by him, but I think it's more or less just him being himself. He's like this on discord as well, I don't think it's enough to properly qualify for a ban. If you could "punish" him temporarily, that might be enoughHe keeps spamming questions and answers threads left and right which some just sound very outlandish and all over the place; like the Low 1-C Goku one and stuff like this. Which all I really have to say ask for the latter is "Why?" Not only that, but he also spams a lot on a lot of threads while abusing NLFs and other obnoxious practices. And he excessively abuses the report button over things that aren't even report worthy at all. I have literally seen this multiple times of just randomly calling people "Pedophiles" for no reason. I know the last example was over someone saying they're a "Lolicon." Which I'm not interested to really talk about them other than it just being art. But calling people pedophiles is a serious allegation people need hard evidence that they're predators out for actual minors and not some people who are in to some weird art style.
Why? Cause he hurt your feelings or something? I do believe that he needs to keep himself under control, but everything he's done is nothing worth banning people over, so I severely disagree with this.He was warned once, and is now cluttering this thread up with his “arguments.” So yeah, he should get banned
I more or less agree with this. Unless he did actually accuse someone falsely of being a pedophile, in which case, just being himself isn't an excuse in the least.I can get why you might get annoyed by him, but I think it's more or less just him being himself. He's like this on discord as well, I don't think it's enough to properly qualify for a ban. If you could "punish" him temporarily, that might be enough
Yeah, but I think banning someone just cause they're saying things we don't like is a little harsh. Unless he's being an asshole and calling everyone names.He's been here since June 2nd. I think that excuse is off the table.
chasekillien is straight up a pedo, do you want me to send images of him talking about child genitalia?I more or less agree with this. Unless he did actually accuse someone falsely of being a pedophile, in which case, just being himself isn't an excuse in the least.