- 2,786
- 358
I easily do
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Most Mario supporters (notably DarkDragonMedeus) agreed with the Brobot feat being 4-A regardless of if it created the realm due to the characters withstanding an explosion that destroyed said dimension.What's been accepted so far?
You know about the second translation I got were it said 'World of Monsters'?
Look like that source says that 'Kingdom of Monsters' sounds more correct:
You can throw out hypotheticals if you want. Pretty much none of it matters unless there's actual backing for it.I'm just throwing out questions to think about
I thought that we had decided to use some 4-A feats. Should these not be referenced in the profile pages, with the rejected feats removed, after which we close this thread?
Last feat to discuss, but it looks like everyone is burned out at this point.Feat: Bowser turned Yoshi's island into a pop-up book containing stars.
This one currently isn't a topic of discussion due to the main focus being on Power Stars, though it apparently is debatable.
Also, turning Yoshi's world into a pop-up book would be immersion or another form of reality warping, not really an AP featYes, let's just apply what has been accepted.
Yeah, Power Stars are too ambiguous. King Boo and Brobot (Kinda?) are the only ones it seems.I thought the Power Stars were too ambiguous to get accepted, just look at Dino's comment above
Just looked it up, they're very clearly generic stars and space background you'd see in any basic background or wallpaper, you can even see some gaseous clouds as well around a few of the stars. Honestly I don't know why you're calling them "small dots". In fact, I'm pretty sure it's literally the game's standard night skybox from the looks of it, meaning they're quite literally no different from every other star we see in game.King Boo is still suspended, actually.
We established that he created the arena, but there's no way to tell that those small dots that sometimes pop out behind the background are actual stars.
We have an ongoing thread all about not authomatically assume that something is a starry sky if nothing confermirms or very strongly suggests that, regardless of how it looks.
That place isn't even on Earth, it was created in another dimension where King Boo has control over the arena and its appearance, its lighting etc...
That "sky" pops out sometimes behind the great spiral and all the battle takes place is a somewhat small arena where space is distorted (as seen by the segments inside the house).
There's definitely nothing aside visual appearance (that is also subject to personal interpretation) and a recycled skybox isn't an evidence, otherwise I could say that it is the normal sky just covered by Boo's arena.
Ok so then what are they? If the literal space background isn't actually space what is it then? Answer this without using the words "could" "maybe" "possibly" "likely" or "potentially". I want an actual clear cut answer not based upon conjecture, if you want to say they aren't actually stars and space, you must have actual reasoning and evidence to suggest they aren't right?There's absolutely no need to shout, I'm not being rude with anyone, as far as I know, and I'd like you to do the same thing, if you please.
Also, just like you argue your points I have to right to argue mine, without you getting upset about it.
Also, I'm not the only one to agree with that, the duck example was even questioned in the same topic.
I'm not saying that it doesn't resemble a starry sky, but proving that something is actually what it looks like, aside from plain visual appearance, should be like the basis of everything.
And, I mean, you're making conjectures just like me, because there's no real way to tell what they are or aren't. A clear cut option is impossible to give, as we lack any kind of evidence aside it being just there.
They may be just lights in the same way the big purple spiral and the vorticous mass of purple "air" are just what they are, i.e. part of the background mainly made as a design choice.
Also, in the same way you ask me to give clear evidences on them not being stars, you should do the same and give real proof that they are, aside from them resembling stars.
And it shouldn't be blatantly a star without context, otherwise we can just pick anything that unexplained in any verse and just tier and powers to anyone based on what they look like to us, which is basically making things up.
The other thread makes a lot of examples of otherwordly places with strange light effects, but we don't automatically assume they are stars or nebulaes or something.
When trying to use something to give a tier, a power or else the burden of proof should be on those who want to apply it, with something more than "it looks like that".
Also, asking for politeness has nothing to do with the thread, I don't see why attacking me should make your point stronger or mine weaker, it just makes thing worse.