• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Over Heaven Reality Overwrite tier upgrade (and a key addition too) [CONTINUED IN NEW THREAD]

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's already listed in the OP (At the very bottom). 10 3rd parties are listed in the OP. Then add me and OP for 11. Oops guess I misread, it's 11 in agreement.
 
Okay. I suppose that what has been accepted is probably fine to apply then.
 
Antvasima said:
Okay. I suppose that what has been accepted is probably fine to apply then.
Click to expand...
It shouldn't tho, should I edit the title of the thread to make it more clear?
 
Why because you disagree? This is getting ******* ridiculous Efi.

>actively changing the title of the thread.

That seems like an abuse of power, especially when the title of the thread is literally what the thread is about.
 
All the noises you guys keep making just prove what I predicted early in the thread. I couldn't care less about the silly misunderstandings on what I said you guys have, that's the best anyone can do when others play the "tire the opposition" game.
 
What are you going on about? Misunderstandings? Do I need to actually go back and quote each and every instance you said those things? Because I will, not exactly hard either, you were kinda straightforward and explicit, kinda hard to misunderstand such lines as

and others I basically couldn't care less about as they inspire me 0 trust in their own care for accuracy.'

I don't care about their opinions.

This was built for them to have opinions like that at first without carefully reading all of it.

The latter is super ******* rude fyi and is unprofessional, you accusing us of shit because others disagree with you is kinda ****** up Efi. Ever consider that maybe they did read the thread carefully?

Or do you mean your counterpoints? Because I can easily just go back and quote what you said as well, again, kinda hard to misunderstand your points when you said them clearly, misunderstanding a point and disagreeing with it is two different things.

And tire the opposition? You mean actually debate on this website dedicated to debating things? Insinuating that's the goal is, once again, kinda ****** up. The hell does that even mean? Do you expect others to simply not bother to reply to you?
 
StrymULTRA said:
Seriously, accepted from WHO? Cal or Efi?
Click to expand...
I meant what has been accepted by the majority, but given Eficiente's opposition, you may need to ask more staff members for help, after somebody writes a summary of the arguments here.
 
Also, everybody please calm down and remain respectful and polite. Thank you.
 
Antvasima said:
I meant what has been accepted by the majority, but given Eficiente's opposition, you may need to ask more staff members for help, after somebody writes a summary of the arguments here.
Click to expand...
Too bad that only 1 content mod disagrees and 1 admin and 1 chat mod agrees, anything should be added honestly
 
It is a rather big change to a prominent verse. We preferably need a bit better staff consensus for something like that.
 
Meaning: You should ask some more staff members if you want something to happen here.
 
My apologies, but visiting message walls frequently wipes out my notifications, so you will have to tell them that I would appreciate their help instead.

Also, you should ask some discussion moderators and administrators instead, preferably ones listed in the JoJo's Bizarre Adventure verse page.
 
Every single admin has already been notified there. I alone contacted I think 7-8?

Edit: Fyi this only changes two non-canon versions of two characters, I wouldn't call it a massive verse wide CRT.
 
Hmm. That is a problem. I obviously cannot force them to respond, but you can tell all of the ones that you contacted previously that I would appreciate their input.
 
Starter Pack himself has already said he doesn't know much about this game, said as much in the former CRT so idk. And, well, they were already notified explicitly that you were asking for their input, I just went to ask Shadowbokunohero for example and OP said on his wall days ago.

Jojo CRT

StrymULTRA

Would you take a look here ? Antvasima asked an opinion from ya

There's not exactly a whole lot we can do except ******* bug the shit out of a couple admins. And idk if I wanna be the person to spam an admin's wall. Idk why most of the admins aren't responding, maybe they just don't know much about the game or simply don't care, either way, they all know.
 
Okay. I suppose that the consensus here should be applied in lack of better options then.
 
My apologies, but Eficiente just told me that this is unacceptable, and we have technically had far too limited staff input. I have just been so overworked and stressed out that I accepted this even though I shouldn't. The revisions will likely have to be reverted. Sorry about the inconvenience.

https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/4217262
 
Then maybe Efi should actually try and debate the subject matter instead of refusing to do so and wasting everyone's time.

And lack of staff input? How many staff do we need? Every single one on the site?

> just because the same users were insisting on it over and over again

Yes because no less than 4 different users are getting tired of playing this prolonged procrastination, sure as **** wasn't just me and OP saying to hurry itup, in fact I didn't even say go ahead with it till at least 3 others said as much. Once again Efi undermining multiple people.

> I wasn't even subtle when I pointed out the thread to use cheap tactics to make everything look passable

Which I find odd? Cheap tatics? Do tell because that sounds to me, offense intended in this case, Efi just being an asshole and accusing others of things when they disagree with her.

>when things like this are accused in a thread

Yeah, that's all it is, a baseless accusation, and a ******* rude one that.

> As in, a simple observation doesn't matter in a thread like that, not that their opinions in general doesn't matter.

Ignoring Efi quite literally said she doesn't care what opinions they have and some aren't trustworthy on top of that, a simple observation is all that's needed, everything is there in the open, everything is said and even the videos and parts of the game themselves has been linked.

Kinda sad that Efi, I thought she was above accusing others of baseless things and undermining everyne but guess I was wrong, especially when she can't even be bothered to debate her stance properly.
 
Look, not all revision threads will lead anywhere, and without around 3-5 discussion moderators and administrators who respond and clearly agree with this change, without much opposition from other staff, I don't think that anything will happen. Sorry, but that is they way these things sometimes go.
 
Not the issue, hell I have like 5 different CRTs alone that are in purgatory hell and haven't been implemented despite being months old, even nearing half a year at this point on some. Things like that are fine.

The issue I have is Efi effectively undermining every single person who agrees in one way or another, blatantly at that given she was quite clear in her words and acting like admins who did agree don't have any idea what they're doing or can't or didn't read anything. On top of rude accusations like this thread is somehow maliciously manipulated to skew the opinions of everyone who reads, while also not actually debating her stance at all. Hell some users have even gone on record saying they reread everything again and still agree.

Seems kinda ****** up if you ask me.
 
You know what? Let's add just the High 3-A ratings at both keys, since all the 3-A stuff is rejected away and there's no point to make him 4-A anymore, so anyone agrees and this thread finally ends.
 
I don't think that we have enough clear staff agreement for that, and we shouldn't enforce unreliable changes just to speed things up.
 
Literally everyone who voted for something agreed with High 3-A, even Efi did.
 
Please summarise which staff members who have clearly agreed with any changes, and what they accepted.

Also, I would appreciate if Eficiente shows up here to elaborate.
 
This is getting tiresome, if we are gonna prolongue this cuz of one person which comes off as rude too and disagrees for not so good reasons, this wont reach any conclusion, others with bigger authority over him said yes, his opinion honestly which is just 1 vs like 2 or 3 shouldnt matter in the slightest
 
BlackDarkness679 said:
This is getting tiresome, if we are gonna prolongue this cuz of one person which comes off as rude too and disagrees for not so good reasons, this wont reach any conclusion, others with bigger authority over him said yes, his opinion honestly which is just 1 vs like 2 or 3 shouldnt matter in the slightest
Click to expand...
true
 
You should ask all of the following members to comment here, so we can get anywhere:

The real cal howard

Saikou The Lewd King

Promestein

SomebodyData

Iapitus The Impaler

Dargoo Faust

DemonGodMitchAubin

Qliphoth Bacikal

Starter Pack

The Smashor

Sir Ovens

You should also tell them all that I would appreciate their help.
 
Antvasima wrote:
Look, not all revision threads will lead anywhere, and without around 3-5 discussion moderators and administrators who respond and clearly agree with this change, without much opposition from other staff, I don't think that anything will happen. Sorry, but that is they way these things sometimes go.

The 3-A was rejected from just Eficiente

The High 3-A was accepted from The real cal howard, TISSG7Redgrave, Eficiente

You said that at least 3 mods and admins should accept an upgrade to the added, and you get 3 mods/admins

So is fine to add the High 3-A ratings
 
No, Redgrave does not have the right to evaluate threads, and given that Eficiente is ambivalent about this, we just end up with Cal, who usually isn't specialised in evaluating content revision threads in the first place.

Just ask everyone in my list, so we don't let through a revision that is inaccurate, just because we are in a hurry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

StrymULTRA
  • Locked
Another CRT that Bites the Dust (High 3-A Yoshikage Kira + extras)
2
Replies
69
Views
5K
StrymULTRA
StrymULTRA
SunDaGamer
  • Locked
JoJo Part 1, 2 and 3 AP upgrades
2
Replies
70
Views
6K
KingTempest
KingTempest
Baken384
Massive Lifting Strength Revision for JJBA High Tiers
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
DRW001
DRW001
Arc7Kuroi
  • Locked
Above Heaven and Below Earth, 0 Alone Surpasses 13
4 5 6
Replies
220
Views
21K
LordTracer
LordTracer
StrawManMan
Dio Over Heaven Downgrade
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top