- 15,580
- 13,079
No offense Efi but your first argument literally effects absolutely nothing, whether it means timeline or universe, it doesn't matter, it'd only matter if the argument was for tier 2, which it isn't and as such it's a moot point. Although I agree with your point, the only thing it would change is one word in the OP, and not anything else because nobody is saying tier 2.
Your second point doesn't actually effect anything, not even sure what you're trying to say. Regardless, it doesn't effect the end result if I think it is what you're trying to insinuate.
And your third point is contradicted by the game itself, the entire plot, the character's themselves, what we see outright on screen, what we know of, disregards occam's razer in full and is based entirely on a maybe that may even contradict you ultimately and an entirely 100% unfounded assumption with zero backing anywhere in the source material, not even a hint or implication and requires a huge logical jump to reach that is honestly quite ludicrous and you're the only person I've seen anywhere that managed to reach said conclusion (Hell even in the original downgrade thread a few months back it was accepted to be the case, it just, never actually got implemented) but is also outright contradicted on screen, by the character doing the thing. Plus we treat warping the universe as 3-A in every other case, see Toppo and Grand Priest. I really don't see the issue here.
Instead of trying to convince another admin that you have a point (Even though that admin has read your points already), why not actually debate your point in the very thread it matters in? Because at the moment, if Cal is to be believed, he read through the entire thread, including your points, and disagreed with it, or at least agreed with or leaned toward the opposite arguments. i don't wanna come of as being a bit to blunt but you're kinda supposed to argue your case in the thread, so others can judge it as well. Then again, you already agreed with the higher rating, you're basically just arguing against the lower of the two ratings in a way that I find kinda sus, you do realize that the tier would go from 3-A, possibly High 3-A to just flat out High 3-A right? Although I disagree with that, lower end or not I find it to be more accurate and explicit as well as an actual showing of power.
>I basically couldn't care less about as they inspire me 0 trust in their own care for accuracy.
That's pretty rude Efi. You can't exactly undermine people like that. (I even agree with one point in full, it just isn't relevant but does warrant a word change to better fit what it actually is).
Also I hit up Sir Ovens.
Your second point doesn't actually effect anything, not even sure what you're trying to say. Regardless, it doesn't effect the end result if I think it is what you're trying to insinuate.
And your third point is contradicted by the game itself, the entire plot, the character's themselves, what we see outright on screen, what we know of, disregards occam's razer in full and is based entirely on a maybe that may even contradict you ultimately and an entirely 100% unfounded assumption with zero backing anywhere in the source material, not even a hint or implication and requires a huge logical jump to reach that is honestly quite ludicrous and you're the only person I've seen anywhere that managed to reach said conclusion (Hell even in the original downgrade thread a few months back it was accepted to be the case, it just, never actually got implemented) but is also outright contradicted on screen, by the character doing the thing. Plus we treat warping the universe as 3-A in every other case, see Toppo and Grand Priest. I really don't see the issue here.
Instead of trying to convince another admin that you have a point (Even though that admin has read your points already), why not actually debate your point in the very thread it matters in? Because at the moment, if Cal is to be believed, he read through the entire thread, including your points, and disagreed with it, or at least agreed with or leaned toward the opposite arguments. i don't wanna come of as being a bit to blunt but you're kinda supposed to argue your case in the thread, so others can judge it as well. Then again, you already agreed with the higher rating, you're basically just arguing against the lower of the two ratings in a way that I find kinda sus, you do realize that the tier would go from 3-A, possibly High 3-A to just flat out High 3-A right? Although I disagree with that, lower end or not I find it to be more accurate and explicit as well as an actual showing of power.
>I basically couldn't care less about as they inspire me 0 trust in their own care for accuracy.
That's pretty rude Efi. You can't exactly undermine people like that. (I even agree with one point in full, it just isn't relevant but does warrant a word change to better fit what it actually is).
Also I hit up Sir Ovens.
