• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I swear, why the meaningless taunt? The guy was civil all the way.
the guy apparently was shittalking me off-site, at least what i heard from another user
it wasnt really a taunt though, just that anyone who says (this debunk is so bad!!! and later tries to challenge me on it off site either ends up losing, straight up conceding, or refusing to debate any further after a certain point.)

its all the same 5 arguments anyway.
 
the guy apparently was shittalking me off-site, at least what i heard from another user
it wasnt really a taunt though, just that anyone who says (this debunk is so bad!!! and later tries to challenge me on it off site either ends up losing, straight up conceding, or refusing to debate any further after a certain point.)
I think everyone shit-talk others, it's human to do so, don't take it too personally.
I mean, I wouldn't see it as conceding, personally, just that it's tiresome to do back and forth. Both of you have very specific ways of seeing things and none would budge, backing away isn't conceding in this case, it's just not wanting to lose more time.

Ultimately, everyone is free to have any opinions they want, no one has the absolute truth on the work they are scaling.
 
I think everyone shit-talk others, it's human to do so, don't take it too personally.
I mean, I wouldn't see it as conceding, personally, just that it's tiresome to do back and forth. Both of you have very specific ways of seeing things and none would budge, backing away isn't conceding in this case, it's just not wanting to lose more time.

Ultimately, everyone is free to have any opinions they want, no one has the absolute truth on the work they are scaling.
Sure, thats understandable. It's just that you have no right to call someone else's scaling "bad", if you cant argue as to why.
 
the guy apparently was shittalking me off-site, at least what i heard from another user
it wasnt really a taunt though, just that anyone who says (this debunk is so bad!!! and later tries to challenge me on it off site either ends up losing, straight up conceding, or refusing to debate any further after a certain point.)

its all the same 5 arguments anyway.
Making fun of you? What makes you think that? I could refute every argument you mentioned until dawn, but I guess I don't have as much free time as you do. You have never been able to refute me in front of me, don't get such a perception
 
I think everyone shit-talk others, it's human to do so, don't take it too personally.
I mean, I wouldn't see it as conceding, personally, just that it's tiresome to do back and forth. Both of you have very specific ways of seeing things and none would budge, backing away isn't conceding in this case, it's just not wanting to lose more time.

Ultimately, everyone is free to have any opinions they want, no one has the absolute truth on the work they are scaling.
I don't think he's smart enough to understand that after what he just said
 
this debunk is so bad!!! and later tries to challenge me on it off site either ends up losing, straight up conceding, or refusing to debate any further after a certain point.)
I am not any of those three things you mentioned. People think that just by looking at this wiki, the character has been completely debunked. It is necessary to disagree about this because you have never been able to refute anything in my eyes. Try again with someone who knows less about it
 
You know... attacking his "intelligence" isn't what I would call "civil".

Just go on with whatever you wish to do, you have no obligation to think about him or interact with him, you're making yourself look bad with nothing to gain.
I am aware of this, but I can't say that I care too much, at least I can continue to keep a civilized attitude, as you call it
 
Back
Top