- 1,269
- 597
By itself sure. It just that the verse follow Type 4 multiverse.OH fr? "all logically possible universe" sounds like modal realism to me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
By itself sure. It just that the verse follow Type 4 multiverse.OH fr? "all logically possible universe" sounds like modal realism to me.
Nobody’s saying Tao isn’t High 1A. We’re saying the root isn’t High 1A just because it takes influence from Taoist philosophy, especially when the argument in question doesn’t even come from the source material but something almost entirely unrelatedI'm tired of these guys lmao. They don't know anything at all.
WhatBy itself sure. It just that the verse follow Type 4 multiverse.
It's in the source material thoNobody’s saying Tao isn’t High 1A. We’re saying the root isn’t High 1A just because it takes influence from Taoist philosophy, especially when the argument in question doesn’t even come from the source material but something almost entirely unrelated
WhatI'm just the type of guy who thinks 2 idiot that agree and 5 that disagree is worse than 5 agree and 2 disagree in this circus
It’s literally not. That’s why people are against itIt's in the source material tho
This:It’s literally not. That’s why people are against it
Is in relation to this"Infinity is not "". In order to render infinity, one must define limits. Without limits, infinity does not exist. Infinity can be observed because objects possess limits. Ryougi Shiki was immersed in infinity, but found the non-existent limit and severed it.
Of course, limits do not exist within infinity, thus one cannot sever something that does not exist. As a result, escaping from this prison is impossible.
However --- without limits, infinity does not exist. Regardless if a finite wall existed, an limitless world is meaningless before Ryougi Shiki.
If there is no limit, then it is not infinity, but " ". If limits exist, then Rougi would find it and cut away everything.
That is in relation to absolute infinity, because it also posits absolute infinity to only be absolute infinity. That's why there's a direct statement of Tao infinity being absolute infinity.What is the Infinite? To define it as other than the finite is to set the infinite apart from the finite, and thereby limit it. To define the infinite, therefore, is to make it definite, and no longer infinite. In fact, to say anything at all of the Infinite, is to actually say nothing about the true Infinite. Like the Tao, the Infinite that can be named is not the true Infinite. The Infinite, then, is ineffable. …Or is it? If we think that the Infinite is ineffable, we have once again defined it by distinguishing it from what is not ineffable. The Infinite is so utterly ineffable that we cannot even say that it is ineffable. Even this, however, is saying too much.
i think there is an outright statement of absolute infinity for SMT but idk.It's weird how the verse had to work an extra mile before anything is accepted, but smt gets 1-A from a singular statement of the concept of spaceand I **** with smt but like what
there isi think there is an outright statement of absolute infinity for SMT but idk.
SMT also had a way more blatant 1A statement of being above the concept of dimensions.It's weird how the verse had to work an extra mile before anything is accepted, but smt gets 1-A from a singular statement of the concept of spaceand I **** with smt but like what
Same with the root. Its above taiji which captures the duality of everything including dimensions on a conceptual level. Not to mention the origin is the primordial essence of everything existing in the verse which would include dimensions and it traces on infinitely.SMT also had a way more blatant 1A statement of being above the concept of dimensions.
whos gonna tell him transduality or being above duality doesn't scale anywhereSame with the root. Its above taiji which captures the duality of everything including dimensions on a conceptual level. Not to mention the origin is the primordial essence of everything existing in the verse which would include dimensions and it traces on infinitely.
Except the dualities are all conceptual.whos gonna tell him transduality or being above duality doesn't scale anywhere
Lmfao bro duality is conceptual by a default.Except the dualities are all conceptual.
Not really. Light and Dark are already dualities. It doesn't have to be the very concept of it. Basically just oppositions. Except this wiki takes every mention of duality as conceptual.Lmfao bro duality is conceptual by a default.
But that isn’t based on extrapolation but a literal statement of transcending the concept of dimensions. Hell, there’s more context that makes it an even more blatant 1A. It’s not the sameSame with the root. Its above taiji which captures the duality of everything including dimensions on a conceptual level. Not to mention the origin is the primordial essence of everything existing in the verse which would include dimensions and it traces on infinitely.
Regardless, both transcend the concept of dimensions.But that isn’t based on extrapolation but a literal statement of transcending the concept of dimensions. Hell, there’s more context that makes it an even more blatant 1A. It’s not the same
meanwhile instant death be like" hi i am the author of id and yogiri is outerversal and transcends type 4 multiverse"SMT also had a way more blatant 1A statement of being above the concept of dimensions.
The type 4 multiverse bit was from the novel. The concept of dimensions thing was funnymeanwhile instant death be like" hi i am the author of id and yogiri is outerversal and transcends type 4 multiverse"
Being above the concept of dimensions is arbitrarily 1-A? Ye no.SMT also had a way more blatant 1A statement of being above the concept of dimensions.
That's nowhere near 1-A without context what.But that isn’t based on extrapolation but a literal statement of transcending the concept of dimensions.
No there's no more context it was only one scan.Hell, there’s more context that makes it an even more blatant 1A.
It says ein sof/absolute infinity, similarly like Taoism that's not cantor absolute infinity.there is
Same situation can be used for Nasuverse.i think there is an outright statement of absolute infinity for SMT but idk.
No, space and time can be treated as a duality and both can exist as physical properties of reality it's not inherently conceptual.Lmfao bro duality is conceptual by a default.
So being above space-time conceptually by extension concept of dimensions isn't 1-a? That's like the point you know....whos gonna tell him transduality or being above duality doesn't scale anywhere
Read the SMT thread. It wasn’t just that.Being above the concept of dimensions is arbitrarily 1-A? Ye no.
Yeah, that scan had more context is what I’m saying.No there's no more context it was only one scan.
With that same line of reasoning taiji capturing dualities conceptually would include the concept of space and time hence make the root 1-A without negative theology.
And even I disagree with just scaling concepts like that especially when they aren't shown to be completely independent of the reality they govern
It did, it just rambled ab irrelevant bullshit then inferred 1-A from that singular. If I'm wrong correct me then what else did it use.Read the SMT thread. It wasn’t just that.
found itIt says ein sof/absolute infinity, similarly like Taoism that's not cantor absolute infinity.
That's exactly what Theoretical said.found it
セフィロートは、アインソフ (絶対的な 無限) と呼ばれる神から流出した神的な 属性によって生み出されたと考えられて いる。
The sefirot are thought to be created by a divine attribute that flows out from God, called ein sof (absolute infinity).
Can you give a complete argument for this?It says ein sof/absolute infinity, similarly like Taoism that's not cantor absolute infinity.
We'll talk later too lazy rnCan you give a complete argument for this?
Because this is not so obvious... By bringing up Ein Sof, you are indirectly also putting in the table concepts such as Ein, Atzmus, Tzimtzum, etc.
To even call Ein Sof "absolute infinity" is... awkward. (If you've read about Kabbalah, my point is that by calling it anything and describing it as a thing in itself with properties, you are already outside (or inside, a part, not the whole) of what would be "Ein Sof", because such actions would be at Chokmah/Binah-level)
imma report him to rvrSo apparently a notorious translator from tumblr shinichameleon was discovered to have made up fake info about the series(especially apocrypha) and claimed it was from interviews. No source and all fan fiction.
Fate/Apocrypha: Free Range Spoiler Thread - Page 682
Go crazy, discuss and speculate to your hearts content, all. - - - Updated - - - Mostly because Leo was too slow in making it. :pforums.nrvnqsr.com
Nothing new under the sun.So apparently a notorious translator from tumblr shinichameleon was discovered to have made up fake info about the series(especially apocrypha) and claimed it was from interviews. No source and all fan fiction.
Fate/Apocrypha: Free Range Spoiler Thread - Page 682
Go crazy, discuss and speculate to your hearts content, all. - - - Updated - - - Mostly because Leo was too slow in making it. :pforums.nrvnqsr.com
Why do you think so?Looks like low 1-A outer gods is inevitable -_- (might be)
Secret. All I'll say is high 1-B universe.Why do you think so?
EHehehhe. Sounds good.Secret. All I'll say is high 1-B universe.
Yes. There's obviously a High 1B structure in the verse and I've argued for it several times but goons wouldn't accept it.Secret. All I'll say is high 1-B universe.
It's for drastically different reasons than what you proposed.Yes. There's obviously a High 1B structure in the verse and I've argued for it several times but goons wouldn't accept it.
If it was, I would have known.It's for drastically different reasons than what you proposed.
"new" material.If it was, I would have known.
Whats it?"new" material.
tsukihime remakeWhats it?