• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Nasuverse Discussion Board (New Forum)

I'm tired of these guys lmao. They don't know anything at all.
Nobody’s saying Tao isn’t High 1A. We’re saying the root isn’t High 1A just because it takes influence from Taoist philosophy, especially when the argument in question doesn’t even come from the source material but something almost entirely unrelated
 
By itself sure. It just that the verse follow Type 4 multiverse.
What 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Nobody’s saying Tao isn’t High 1A. We’re saying the root isn’t High 1A just because it takes influence from Taoist philosophy, especially when the argument in question doesn’t even come from the source material but something almost entirely unrelated
It's in the source material tho 💀
I'm just the type of guy who thinks 2 idiot that agree and 5 that disagree is worse than 5 agree and 2 disagree in this circus 🗣️
What 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
 
It’s literally not. That’s why people are against it
This:
"Infinity is not "". In order to render infinity, one must define limits. Without limits, infinity does not exist. Infinity can be observed because objects possess limits. Ryougi Shiki was immersed in infinity, but found the non-existent limit and severed it.

Of course, limits do not exist within infinity, thus one cannot sever something that does not exist. As a result, escaping from this prison is impossible.

However --- without limits, infinity does not exist. Regardless if a finite wall existed, an limitless world is meaningless before Ryougi Shiki.

If there is no limit, then it is not infinity, but " ". If limits exist, then Rougi would find it and cut away everything.
Is in relation to this

What is the Infinite? To define it as other than the finite is to set the infinite apart from the finite, and thereby limit it. To define the infinite, therefore, is to make it definite, and no longer infinite. In fact, to say anything at all of the Infinite, is to actually say nothing about the true Infinite. Like the Tao, the Infinite that can be named is not the true Infinite. The Infinite, then, is ineffable. …Or is it? If we think that the Infinite is ineffable, we have once again defined it by distinguishing it from what is not ineffable. The Infinite is so utterly ineffable that we cannot even say that it is ineffable. Even this, however, is saying too much.
That is in relation to absolute infinity, because it also posits absolute infinity to only be absolute infinity. That's why there's a direct statement of Tao infinity being absolute infinity.

There's logic behind that and a direct statement.

Why does it feel like even when there's clear implications nasu has to make direct statements like "oh hey fans there's absolute infinity" before anything can be accepted when we know the nasuverse works under implications and barely makes direct statements.

It's weird how the verse had to work an extra mile before anything is accepted, but smt gets 1-A from a singular statement of the concept of space and I **** with smt but like what 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
 
It's weird how the verse had to work an extra mile before anything is accepted, but smt gets 1-A from a singular statement of the concept of space and I **** with smt but like what
SMT also had a way more blatant 1A statement of being above the concept of dimensions.
 
SMT also had a way more blatant 1A statement of being above the concept of dimensions.
Same with the root. Its above taiji which captures the duality of everything including dimensions on a conceptual level. Not to mention the origin is the primordial essence of everything existing in the verse which would include dimensions and it traces on infinitely.
 
Same with the root. Its above taiji which captures the duality of everything including dimensions on a conceptual level. Not to mention the origin is the primordial essence of everything existing in the verse which would include dimensions and it traces on infinitely.
whos gonna tell him transduality or being above duality doesn't scale anywhere
 
Same with the root. Its above taiji which captures the duality of everything including dimensions on a conceptual level. Not to mention the origin is the primordial essence of everything existing in the verse which would include dimensions and it traces on infinitely.
But that isn’t based on extrapolation but a literal statement of transcending the concept of dimensions. Hell, there’s more context that makes it an even more blatant 1A. It’s not the same
 
But that isn’t based on extrapolation but a literal statement of transcending the concept of dimensions. Hell, there’s more context that makes it an even more blatant 1A. It’s not the same
Regardless, both transcend the concept of dimensions.
 
SMT also had a way more blatant 1A statement of being above the concept of dimensions.
Being above the concept of dimensions is arbitrarily 1-A? Ye no.
But that isn’t based on extrapolation but a literal statement of transcending the concept of dimensions.
That's nowhere near 1-A without context what.
Hell, there’s more context that makes it an even more blatant 1A.
No there's no more context it was only one scan.

With that same line of reasoning taiji capturing dualities conceptually would include the concept of space and time hence make the root 1-A without negative theology.

And even I disagree with just scaling concepts like that especially when they aren't shown to be completely independent of the reality they govern
It says ein sof/absolute infinity, similarly like Taoism that's not cantor absolute infinity.
i think there is an outright statement of absolute infinity for SMT but idk.
Same situation can be used for Nasuverse.
Lmfao bro duality is conceptual by a default.
No, space and time can be treated as a duality and both can exist as physical properties of reality it's not inherently conceptual.
whos gonna tell him transduality or being above duality doesn't scale anywhere
So being above space-time conceptually by extension concept of dimensions isn't 1-a? That's like the point you know....
 
Being above the concept of dimensions is arbitrarily 1-A? Ye no.
Read the SMT thread. It wasn’t just that.


No there's no more context it was only one scan.

With that same line of reasoning taiji capturing dualities conceptually would include the concept of space and time hence make the root 1-A without negative theology.

And even I disagree with just scaling concepts like that especially when they aren't shown to be completely independent of the reality they govern
Yeah, that scan had more context is what I’m saying.
 
It says ein sof/absolute infinity, similarly like Taoism that's not cantor absolute infinity.
found it
セフィロートは、アインソフ (絶対的な 無限) と呼ばれる神から流出した神的な 属性によって生み出されたと考えられて いる。
The sefirot are thought to be created by a divine attribute that flows out from God, called ein sof (absolute infinity).
 
found it
セフィロートは、アインソフ (絶対的な 無限) と呼ばれる神から流出した神的な 属性によって生み出されたと考えられて いる。
The sefirot are thought to be created by a divine attribute that flows out from God, called ein sof (absolute infinity).
That's exactly what Theoretical said.
 
It says ein sof/absolute infinity, similarly like Taoism that's not cantor absolute infinity.
Can you give a complete argument for this?
Because this is not so obvious... By bringing up Ein Sof, you are indirectly also putting in the table concepts such as Ein, Atzmus, Tzimtzum, etc.
To even call Ein Sof "absolute infinity" is... awkward. (If you've read about Kabbalah, my point is that by calling it anything and describing it as a thing in itself with properties, you are already outside (or inside, a part, not the whole) of what would be "Ein Sof", because such actions would be at Chokmah/Binah-level)
 
Can you give a complete argument for this?
Because this is not so obvious... By bringing up Ein Sof, you are indirectly also putting in the table concepts such as Ein, Atzmus, Tzimtzum, etc.
To even call Ein Sof "absolute infinity" is... awkward. (If you've read about Kabbalah, my point is that by calling it anything and describing it as a thing in itself with properties, you are already outside (or inside, a part, not the whole) of what would be "Ein Sof", because such actions would be at Chokmah/Binah-level)
We'll talk later too lazy rn
 
So apparently a notorious translator from tumblr shinichameleon was discovered to have made up fake info about the series(especially apocrypha) and claimed it was from interviews. No source and all fan fiction.

 
So apparently a notorious translator from tumblr shinichameleon was discovered to have made up fake info about the series(especially apocrypha) and claimed it was from interviews. No source and all fan fiction.

imma report him to rvr
 
So apparently a notorious translator from tumblr shinichameleon was discovered to have made up fake info about the series(especially apocrypha) and claimed it was from interviews. No source and all fan fiction.

Nothing new under the sun.
Western TM Fandom is full of head canons, mistranslations and misinterpretations.
 
Back
Top