- 15,637
- 5,392
Superiority does not equate to scaling to another unrelated character.WeeklyBattles said:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Superiority does not equate to scaling to another unrelated character.WeeklyBattles said:
Cinder did not 'easily dissipate them', she used visibly powerful fireballs (weve seen her use casual fire before, this is not that) and all it did was split the attack into three which Glynda then used to continue attackingDargoo Faust said:Cinder doesn't even need to dodge attacks. She casually blocks/dissipates all of that Glynda throws at her. That was also the guy's reaction, not Cinder's.
The thing is, the OP's very evidence works in opposition to himself? He's basically saying that characters don't scale... By linking scenes where they do scale.RegisNex1232 said:@Matt You do realize that it was already discussed in the OP? Nothing you said is new or supported by OP's evidence.
WeeklyBattles said:
First one: I'd require context on how he fights, but unless he uses hax / prep time / stealth archery (lol) I don't see how he could kill a Maiden while also being hundreds of times weaker.WeeklyBattles said:
And I'll reply with what I said. Glynda and the other girl traded each other's attacks. They felt the need to block / dodge / counter each other's magic, and when they both fired magic it was evenly matched. You need heavy mental gymnastics to say they don't scale.Dargoo Faust said:You're implying the scenes do scale. I'll just repost a portion of the OP:
"Traded" is outright false when only one casual attack landed in the fight. I suggest you go over it again. You need heavy mental gymnastics to say they don't scale. It's simple logic. One attack lands, and it a similar context you're claiming it doesn't scale. I don't see your reasoning, and you have yet to properly address this.Matthew Schroeder said:And I'll reply with what I said. Glynda and the other girl traded each other's attacks.Dargoo Faust said:You're implying the scenes do scale. I'll just repost a portion of the OP:
I did go, and I still don't see your point. Nothing implies she was casual. Both had to block each other and their magical attacks canceled each other.Dargoo Faust said:"Traded" is outright false when only one casual attack landed in the fight. I suggest you go over it again.
You're allowed to disagree, although that doesn't mean that the vast majority who disagrees with you doesn't have a point.Matthew Schroeder said:They are all straightforward, Dargoo.
I saw the direct scaling feats and considered they direct and straightforward, so I disagree with the OP's opinion. Just because he argued against using those fights doesn't mean they're unusable as arguments?
No, Qrow's statement clearly involves fighting them in combat.
Watts' states that he wouldn't be defeated easily. Nothing implies otherwise.
You're implying Cinder needed to. Cinder putting up a large fight would have endangered what was clearly a covert operation as well as their transport. Going by what the man said, they clearly didn't want to draw attention. Again, I'll mention how the same situation happens with Ruby.Matthew Schroeder said:I did go, and I still don't see your point. Nothing implies she was casual. Both had to block each other and their magical attacks canceled each other.Dargoo Faust said:"Traded" is outright false when only one casual attack landed in the fight. I suggest you go over it again.
Nope. Look at the first half of the comment section, many had lots to add to the debate. Stop dismissing them as if they are FRAs, it does a big disservice to them. And I'm bringing up arguments, however I'd also like you to adress the fact that I have not been the only one to contribute here instead of dismissing grounded opinions for no reason.Matthew Schroeder said:The majority who disagreed literally said nothing other than "I agree", and when faced with a counterargument the predominant response was "OP already answered!". Actually debate here. It's about arguments, not numbers.
As a group? Two / Three vs One? At best you'd divide the calc value by that.
I have seen Watts' quotes, let's no degrade into arguing semantics. "He won't go down quietly or without a fight" means that they'd have to put effort to kill him. Then Cinder suggests they all attack him together, and is responded by the fact that he'll be with others.
Meaning that not only they know he won't be defeated easily, they'd have to team up on him to do so.
He blatantly scales.
I don't understand how doging and escaping implies scaling.Matthew Schroeder said:He wasn't talking about 5 - 6 people, only three. And it's a good thing there's like four statements plus a scene that suggest Qrow scales.
...Dargoo Faust said:He never took a hit from Cinder, ergo he wouldn't be aware of how powerful she is.
No, there's nothing that implies that. Knowing something exists is wholly separate from knowing how powerful they are.WeeklyBattles said:Qrow is one of the few people who knows the maidens even existDargoo Faust said:He never took a hit from Cinder, ergo he wouldn't be aware of how powerful she is.
And then later in the series he explaines that half of her power was stolen by Cinder
If you want to speak about lack of context I could have a field day with no one stating the fact that Qrow is one of the few who knows that the Maidens exist when dismissing his statements.Dargoo Faust said:I think you just watched everything after what Weekly linked you, instead of looking to see what the situation was. Nor am I hand-waving statements, I'm actively disproving them through showing you the context of the scene.
I linked the scenes alongside commentary in these posts. Read them:Desmond253 said:share the link please I don't feel like diging through entire episodes this late at night
I've made my points, please counter them indvidually so I can reply back without having to repeat myself as to how they don't apply to fighting/scaling. As I don't see how they are direct/apply to scaling, and all you're saying here is that you disagree without any real argument/counter.Matthew Schroeder said:I did see your arguments on all the other statements and I frankly don't see where you're coming from? They're all very direct and relate to the Maidens / characters on that level. And all but one most certainly relate to fighting.
I mean, sure you can mention that it will involve "hunting / infiltration", but at the end of the day doesn't everything in RWBY get resolved by anime fights?