- 6,590
- 3,421
Number 1 and 2, about Trish and Nevan, they have cloud to ground lightning feats in cutscenes and/or in gameplay
See right here at 32:16 for Trish's feat
See right here at 32:16 for Trish's feat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, the lightning reached him, that's why the game registered it as a block and you see Dante's Just Block guard tighten as the bolts hits. Those three bangs you hear are Dante blocking 3 lightning strikes in quick succession by perfectly pressing the RG button 3 times.Ok but the attack hasn't reached him and we see no lightning on the screen, even though dante is already in position and doesn't move from that point forward.
I would say the white particle beams remaining are the graphical glitch as the cutscene shows the beam was already discharged and so the beam appearing out of thin air is to show that the beam was discharged.About that mundus thing. The whole "you see it appear a few feet away from his face". That seems mostly like a graphics thing considering the beam only gets larger from there, it would keep the same length if it were already fired.
No, because the cutscenes prior literally show the beam was already fired and the beam not shooting from Mundus' head instead, appearing in mid-air head proves the intent of the cutscene is to show Dante reacting to the beam.You debunk yourself with the last three points. The beam was leaving the forehead when the frame happened, why would the beam be missing if it was already in the air.
That's just your opinion directly contradicted with actual proof. Dante "reacting" could might as well be dramatic effect considering if we took it literally the beam would've already been in his face not leaving Mundus's face as the proof directly shows.No, because the cutscenes prior literally show the beam was already fired and the beam not shooting from Mundus' head instead, appearing in mid-air head proves the intent of the cutscene is to show Dante reacting to the beam.
>actual proofThat's just your opinion directly contradicted with actual proof. Dante "reacting" could might as well be dramatic effect considering if we took it literally the beam would've already been in his face not leaving Mundus's face as the proof directly shows.
Okay, sure.The screenshots I've shown multiple times. You haven't provided anything besides your opinion that's directly contradicted by the game itself.
No, the lightning flashes three times each time. If it were one strike there would be no three separate flashes that cover the entire screen. And if Dante is fast enough to Just Block one lightning bolt three times that has already engulfed his body I'm pretty sure that's more impressive than reacting to 3 different lightning bolts in quick succession.@Dienomite22
>blocks 3 consecutive lightning strikes
LMAO. No that is just the lightning having 3 separate hit boxes. Similar to saviour's energy beam in dmc4.
>the particles were the glitch
Yeah not really, the beam gets clearly longer, that doesn't happen unless it hadn't been fired.
The beam is expanding because it's a different effect that is slower compared to the other effect shown when Mundus fires the beam prior times.The beam being invisible doesn't prove that it was fired before hand. That doesn't even make any sense. Not to mention you can clearly see even in your own screen shots that the beam is expanding, which wouldn't happen if it was already fired.
Dramatic effect? The most obvious reason? Because by this logic the beam would've already been in Dante's face not going out of Mundus's face if we follow the "zoom in" logic.Why would the developers show the beam firing in the before? Why would the devs show a pan shot rushing towards Dante after the beam is fired? That is what doesn't make sense.
Here you can see Nevan summoning Lighting Cloud to Ground at 1:20 and 2:50@EFÍTÉ
2. Yeah but as I'm discussing with dienomite those aren't any good either.
3. I say the scan used are flawed and don't give a rating. If you can give me good scans go ahead. I just gotta love the "your whole argument is that the scans for the feat don't give a speed rating" statement like I'm making the bad arguments here.
5. The entire point flew right over your head here.....
@Dante_Demon_Killah I already talked about nevan. As for trish that was used as a means of travel so I doubt trish was located in the clouds before that, but ill wait for more people's opinion on that one.
@Dienomite22
>blocks 3 consecutive lightning strikes
LMAO. No that is just the lightning having 3 separate hit boxes. Similar to saviour's energy beam in dmc4.
>the particles were the glitch
Yeah not really, the beam gets clearly longer, that doesn't happen unless it hadn't been fired.
@EFÍTÉ Throw the feats here so we can see and evaluate them.
It's nice to know standards have lowered so much that saying a feat is "dramatic effect" is considered an argument now.They didn't make it on purpose, it's obviously graphical limitation on frames.
Dramatic effect? The most obvious reason? Because by this logic the beam would've already been in Dante's face not going out of Mundus's face if we follow the "zoom in" logic.
He actively told us, in the video description, that he messed up the blocks.Ugh, these arguments.... I'll reply tomorrow. But I just am amazed at how y'all argue "that is just Tony messing up the block" when he actually didn't, he royal blocks that one. Just keep that in mind.
I called bullshit on two active detractors of the verse, one of which does not even pretend to be knowledgeable and both being extremely controversial figures, immediately responding to your thread before any knowledgeable had been alerted or even knew about the thread.Also my man legit called "corruption" on the admins agreeing with me. Kek
I think everyone has an opinion on something it's not like the staff members were the only ones who agreed. I think you're making a much bigger deal than necessary out of this.I have to say, without naming any names (Though lets face it anybody familiar with these threads know exactly who I am speaking too), the fact that we have people with biased fueled opinions even as staff members is genuinely disappointing, we are trusted with having a neutral thought on revisions and thread. You may not like everyone and everything, that's fine and normal, but if you're letting that dictate your decision over legitimacy, come on.