• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Devil May Cry Discussion Thread

Ok so the Pluto profile is already made by Tony.

But question is, does his apperance in PoC are canon? I mean literally canon to DMC games? Might be better if you asked this to Matt on twitter for this.
Concurrently, POC has canonical elements, buts that is really it. Pluto's page mentions this in the notes at the bottom
 
Both have been acepted as good translations.
In certain moments, translation A as better, and on other moments B as better.

But that didnt discredit the quality of both translations.
 
With this the next best feat they have to fall back on is 4-A for mundus' pocket realm feat
That pocket realm is called a universe in Precious Tears as confirmed in a recent CRT thread. An infinitely expanding universe at that. Kamiya's word is just another confirmation and support.
 
That pocket realm is called a universe in Precious Tears as confirmed in a recent CRT thread. An infinitely expanding universe at that. Kamiya's word is just another confirmation and support.
And you would need proof that that scales to physicals
 
How demonic energy works inverse already takes care of that pretty much.

Also, since the downgrade is doing 4-a anyway off that feat, doesn't that mean the supposed downgrade already agrees that the feat would scale to physicality?
 
How demonic energy works inverse already takes care of that pretty much.
Again our new regulations basically invalidate that,you need explicit proof that the creation feats scale to their destruction feats
Also, since the downgrade is doing 4-a anyway off that feat, doesn't that mean the supposed downgrade already agrees that the feat would scale to physicality?
The 4-A feat would be a downgrade of their tier 2 feats, not their physicals.
 
And you would need proof that that scales to physicals
Mundus got his power from the Qliphoth's fruit. That would naturally make it scale unless you seriously believe Mundus had universe-creating powers before coming into contact with the Qliphoth or that the Qliphoth grants creation powers (which it doesn't). Not to mention Mundus using his demonic power for everything he creates.
 
Weekly you do know that Bayonetta's 3-A and 2-C feats are in question of that if that's seriously the standard? Not to mention that specific standard applies to things smaller than moons. Universal pocket dimensions aren't required for that when it checks off the requirements for creation feats, which applies to mundus.
 
Weekly you do know that Bayonetta's 3-A and 2-C feats are in question of that if that's seriously the standard? Not to mention that specific standard applies to things smaller than moons. Universal pocket dimensions aren't required for that when it checks off the requirements for creation feats, which applies to mundus.
Nope, they wer already discussed, they have actual physicalfeats of 3-A and 2-C destruction
 
Mundus got his power from the Qliphoth's fruit. That would naturally make it scale unless you seriously believe Mundus had universe-creating powers before coming into contact with the Qliphoth or that the Qliphoth grants creation powers (which it doesn't). Not to mention Mundus using his demonic power for everything he creates.
Again,having the same power source does not automatically translate into creation scaling to physical power, thats literally a written rule on the new standards page
 
No they do not, literally all we ever got for them is creating a universe and merging two timelines, therefore by your twisted logic Bayo's not close to that level.
 
No they do not, literally all we ever got for them is creating a universe and merging two timelines, therefore by your twisted logic Bayo's not close to that level.
You really werent paying attention to the crt if thats all you think they have but yes, if that were all they had then they would be downgradd as well

Also why are you bringing up Bayonetta here? This is the DMC thread
 
Again,having the same power source does not automatically translate into creation scaling to physical power, thats literally a written rule on the new standards page
That isn't the same power source thing. Mundus literally got his power from a fruit that only gives a butt load of demonic power on the level of a demon king to whoever eats it. Without the Qliphoth, Mundus would not have been able to perform his feat from DMC1.
 
That isn't the same power source thing. Mundus literally got his power from a fruit that only gives a butt load of demonic power on the level of a demon king to whoever eats it. Without the Qliphoth, Mundus would not have been able to perform his feat from DMC1.
Okay so it should be easy to show a feat of destruction on that level if it exists, but if not then that point is moot and would be treated as a 'same energy source'
 
"In order to apply to a character's capacity to harm other characters, that is their usual Attack Potency, their Creation has to be connected to their other abilities. For example, it can be reasoned that a mage who can conjure a city with little mana can destroy one with the same amount of mana, however a character who can create objects without other ways of harming their opponents wouldn't be able to harness that power to hurt another character, and would fall under a light form of Environmental Destruction."
how does this not fit demon power?
and where does it state "it needs destruction feats of equal worth for it to apply to AP"?
 
But no, that isn't how the standards work.

Requirement 1: Specify what exactly is being stabilized so that it is made clear what the character's sustainability is doing precisely.

Requirement 2: Prove that the stabilized structure is being directly sustained by the power of the character and not from the character's abilities, life force, existence, magical properties or any unknown connection that is independent of their statistics.

Requirement 3: Prove that the character's stabilization is comparable to the scale of the structure they are stabilizing. Preferably, it should be proven that the character's sustainability is comparable to the destruction of the structure to best show that their power rivals the destructive output of what would destroy the structure in the first place. Please keep in mind that this may vary depending on how the structure's destruction would occur. For example, if a character sustains the existence of a universe that would not be instantly or immediately destroyed when no longer supported, the power of their sustainability would not be comparable to destructive output that completely and immediately destroys a universe, and would not be sufficient enough to be given a 3-A or Low 2-C rating. However, their sustainability could be given either rating if the universe they sustain would be completely destroyed instantly or immediately without support.

Requirement 4: Prove that the power of the character's stabilization consistently scales to their regular statistics, similar to our standards for creation feats.
 
@WeeklyBattles then prove me wrong and show me the proof, because last time I checked the main feats for 3-A and 2-C is making a universe and merging the timelines.
Off the top of my head theres Bayo destroying the barrier around Hell that was designed to withstand the universe's destruction and Jubileus, Sheba, and Aesir tanking the event that split th universe into the Trinity of Realities

But again this is derailing the conversation, ive no idea why you decided to bring Bayonetta into this
 
Last edited:
Weekly, that isn't only a stabilization feat. It's first and foremost a creation feat.

Requirement 1: Specify what exactly is being stabilized so that it is made clear what the character's sustainability is doing precisely.

Requirement 2: Prove that the stabilized structure is being directly sustained by the power of the character and not from the character's abilities, life force, existence, magical properties or any unknown connection that is independent of their statistics.

Requirement 3: Prove that the character's stabilization is comparable to the scale of the structure they are stabilizing. Preferably, it should be proven that the character's sustainability is comparable to the destruction of the structure to best show that their power rivals the destructive output of what would destroy the structure in the first place. Please keep in mind that this may vary depending on how the structure's destruction would occur. For example, if a character sustains the existence of a universe that would not be instantly or immediately destroyed when no longer supported, the power of their sustainability would not be comparable to destructive output that completely and immediately destroys a universe, and would not be sufficient enough to be given a 3-A or Low 2-C rating. However, their sustainability could be given either rating if the universe they sustain would be completely destroyed instantly or immediately without support.

Requirement 4: Prove that the power of the character's stabilization consistently scales to their regular statistics, similar to our standards for creation feats.
Weekly, it's a creation feat that falls directly in line with the creation feat standards. The stability side is secondary.
 
Weekly, that isn't only a stabilization feat. It's first and foremost a creation feat.

Weekly, it's a creation feat that falls directly in line with the creation feat standards. The stability side is secondary.
"In order to apply to a character's capacity to harm other characters, that is their usual Attack Potency, their Creation has to be connected to their other abilities. For example, it can be reasoned that a mage who can conjure a city with little mana can destroy one with the same amount of mana, however a character who can create objects without other ways of harming their opponents wouldn't be able to harness that power to hurt another character, and would fall under a light form of Environmental Destruction."

Mundus' feat would still be viableas a creation feat but without any other feats on that level theres nothing to argue that it scales to general AP
 
Off the top of my head theres Bayo destroying the barrier around Hell that was designed to withstand the universe's destruction
Weekly that "feat" got throughly debunked a while ago. You were in the thread. There is a reason why that is nowhere in the scaling or on any blogs. Why are you being disingenuous?
 
That feat's not even part of the reasons they're 3-A to 2-C, the gates at best have statements of being protected from humans.
 

"Even though there is concrete evidence for pocket reality creations to qualify as an Attack Potency feat; it should not be assumed to scale to physical statistics without some notable scaling reasons. Examples include on screen demonstrations, examples of destruction, or information that the same pool of energy used to create said dimension can translate to the same amount of energy being used for other abilities including but not limited to physical strikes."
 
Weekly that "feat" got throughly debunked a while ago. You were in the thread. There is a reason why that is nowhere in the scaling or on any blogs. Why are you being disingenuous?
Dude i dont even know why Glass decided to bring up Bayonetta here im justtrying to gt him to go away and stop derailing

Plus this is the first time ive ever brought up that feat so i have no idea where you think it was debunked
 
Weekly, that isn't only a stabilization feat. It's first and foremost a creation feat.

Weekly, it's a creation feat that falls directly in line with the creation feat standards. The stability side is secondary.

"Even though there is concrete evidence for pocket reality creations to qualify as an Attack Potency feat; it should not be assumed to scale to physical statistics without some notable scaling reasons. Examples include on screen demonstrations, examples of destruction, or information that the same pool of energy used to create said dimension can translate to the same amount of energy being used for other abilities including but not limited to physical strikes."

You would need proof that his physical AP is equal to the energy of the creation feat
 
I'm bringing up bayonetta cause I'm pointing out the flawed logic you're pulling. Also no I'm not going away as I have the right to debate for or against a point in a verse I know about.
 
"In order to apply to a character's capacity to harm other characters, that is their usual Attack Potency, their Creation has to be connected to their other abilities. For example, it can be reasoned that a mage who can conjure a city with little mana can destroy one with the same amount of mana, however a character who can create objects without other ways of harming their opponents wouldn't be able to harness that power to hurt another character, and would fall under a light form of Environmental Destruction."

Mundus' feat would still be viableas a creation feat but without any other feats on that level theres nothing to argue that it scales to general AP
He doesn't need any other feats. He performed the feat by using energy that he got from a fruit that gives the person who eats it nothing but energy.
 
I'm bringing up bayonetta cause I'm pointing out the flawed logic you're pulling. Also no I'm not going away as I have the right to debate for or against a point in a verse I know about.
Then she'd be downgraded too. Cool, now go away, we were having a nice calm conversation before you butted in and derailed everything
 
He doesn't need any other feats. He performed the feat by using energy that he got from a fruit that gives the person who eats it nothing but energy.
He needs feats of destruction on par with the feats of creation, thats literally why these standards were made
 
No I'm not gonna go away, you're constantly making random claims with no rhyme or reason when Mundus and the other god tiers have more evidence to suggest it scales to their actual power as opposed to just creation.
 
He needs feats of destruction on par with the feats of creation, thats literally why these standards were made
Except the standards say "In order to apply to a character's capacity to harm other characters, that is their usual Attack Potency, their Creation has to be connected to their other abilities. For example, it can be reasoned that a mage who can conjure a city with little mana can destroy one with the same amount of mana, however a character who can create objects without other ways of harming their opponents wouldn't be able to harness that power to hurt another character, and would fall under a light form of Environmental Destruction."

Mundus is the mage and demonic power is the mana. The only way to debunk this is by saying Mundus could create universes without the Qliphoth Fruit's energy which is complete and utter nonsense.
 
Back
Top