ZellTemplar55 said:
| Content |
|---|
| First, SA crew sucked in character research. Even SA crew themselves acknowledged they sucked more in research in the past than nowadays. (they actually revisited Mario vs Sonic because they knew over the years 1. their research skills sucked in the past, 2. the Death Battle rules now are different from the past 3. Mario and Sonic have launched newer games that may upgrade their arsenal and therefore change their verdicts). Their special research style (by doing everything by themselves without reference to other crossover versus debate site materials) despite within very short time constraints. They seldom rely on scaling and relied on few scalings. But they did have strong opinions on particular feats found - so strong they seldom cross-checked with other sources. Time constraints are an issue and they were doing several lines of research like months ago before lining up into story writing, production and post-production process etc. Their reluctance to rely on non-original source also tightens the schedules yet they feel they want authenticity in their eyes despite being susceptible to miss a lot of feats which in contrary lowers the very authenticity they want to keep. They technically did not have much influences from outside to make their own biases. They just effed up by themselves in some powers and abilities in different directions from time to time (which affect verdicts though), e.g. they never acknowledge Mach 6000+ combat speed for Marvel small town characters except Quicksilver but they actually accept no-limits Superma and Wonder Woma to the point Wonder Woman's sword can "slice everything" and Supes & Wondie have crazy direct feats in combat speed only surpassed by Dr Fate and Darkseid. (The most recent two matches truly effed up in Death Battle are Carnage VS Lucy and Nightwing VS Daredevil.) They seem to minimise their chances of screwing up researches in a few ways: 1. making matchups with clear margins in powers and abilities like Optimus Prime vs Gundam, Crash vs Spyro, Sora vs Pit, etc. 2&3. making DBX matches and Community Death Battle matches beforehand (Black Panther vs Batman, Ultron vs Sigma). |
Personally i would rather see Devilman fight Spawn.Hellbeast1 said:
Well basically Screwattack did not say things all wrong. To be frank, their verdict is what I personally would expect for Arkham Nightwing vs MCU Daredevil. This would be possibly one of DB's closest match-up's to date. Sure, based on their previous feats, we can tell that Nightwing seemed a little stronger and more acrobatic, and Daredevil seemed a little quicker to react. But these differences were extremely minimal, it's actually feasible that these two could pull off almost all the exact same feats - keyword being "almost". Without their base stats being almost equal, NW's arsenal cannot pull a big advantage against DD's blind powers.Sorvoe551 said:
Like in which discord group? Sorry I can hardly find such discussion thread here. Instead I have seen upgrade threads recently for Avengers and X-Men characters.MrKingOfNegativity said:
When? This the first I'm hearing of this.MrKingOfNegativity said:
DMUA said:
Xel'Naga Kerrigan is a crazy girl one Yuno Gasai can still take her down.DMUA said:
Kingpi vs Pengui exists though. And Marvel fans need this and Red Hood vs Winter Soldier more since Nightwing vs Daredevil.Hellbeast1 said:
I'm not sure what to think of this match.Jasonsith said:
Well. Darkseid-> Thanos, but Black Panther -> Batman and Venom -> Bane, your logic doesnt have much sense.TitanCrusher101 said:
Not true, at all.Sorvoe551 said:
