-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Avengers: Endgame Revision (with major spoilers) (2)
- 13,762
- 14,046
- 32,767
- 37,927
No idea on that.
Anyway, Iron Man with Mark 2-5 should probably be upped to High 8-C. Iron Man with Mk 3 can one-shot tanks and Mark 6 and onwards are confirmed to have 10 gigawatt arc reactors. Busting M1 Abrams tanks is just 2x above that.
Anyway, Iron Man with Mark 2-5 should probably be upped to High 8-C. Iron Man with Mk 3 can one-shot tanks and Mark 6 and onwards are confirmed to have 10 gigawatt arc reactors. Busting M1 Abrams tanks is just 2x above that.
- 2,294
- 2,729
War Machine is just 8-C. Meh
- 2,294
- 2,729
Yes
- 13,762
- 14,046
- Thread starter
- #9
Since a suppressed MCU Captain Marvel can blast through concrete and even aluminium walls easily, are we tiering her at punching a 43 cm radius manhole on an aluminium ceiling at 1.27 cm yielding 2034553.056 J (Wall Level)?
- 6,849
- 1,499
Art by @spdrmnkyxxiii (Instagram)
Reposted from the other thread.
Cropped one for the team. Thoughts on if we should use this or the current one?
- 2,460
- 921
@Gemmysaur
The Foolish Omniscient Guy noted that we can't use the fan art without artist's permission. Did the artist gave you permission to use his art?
The Foolish Omniscient Guy noted that we can't use the fan art without artist's permission. Did the artist gave you permission to use his art?
- 11,095
- 4,317
I remember someone calculating Captain Marvel to be MHS+ or something. Can somebody link that?
CuteAnimeNekoGirl99
She/Her- 3,147
- 1,611
so should we take thanos' claim to erase the current mcu universe and create a new one in endgame?
- 13,762
- 14,046
- Thread starter
- #18
Usually no.Agletonwiki said:
Decimation of half all lives in the universe is some Solar System level feat.
And a planet busting feat in a flashback in GOTG is Large Planet level afaik.
CuteAnimeNekoGirl99
She/Her- 3,147
- 1,611
so thanos should be at least solar system level?
- 11,095
- 4,317
I don't think Thanos converted half of the universe to energy.
- 11,095
- 4,317
We should imo.Agletonwiki said:
- 13,762
- 14,046
- Thread starter
- #22
We should imo.
We should not imho.
The craziest and most notable feat by Thanos is to decimate half of all life forms in the universe. Which I calculated to be a 4-B feat. And that is a feat Thanos has performed.
If he has not delivered an energy output / intake to destroy a universe and recreate it, we could hardly take that as a feat indicator, else all standing Avengers will be 3-A or even low 2-C just by being in the battle with a 3-A or low 2-C.
We should not imho.
The craziest and most notable feat by Thanos is to decimate half of all life forms in the universe. Which I calculated to be a 4-B feat. And that is a feat Thanos has performed.
If he has not delivered an energy output / intake to destroy a universe and recreate it, we could hardly take that as a feat indicator, else all standing Avengers will be 3-A or even low 2-C just by being in the battle with a 3-A or low 2-C.
- 11,095
- 4,317
We should imo.
We should not imho.
The craziest and most notable feat by Thanos is to decimate half of all life forms in the universe. Which I calculated to be a 4-B feat. And that is a feat Thanos has performed.
If he has not delivered an energy output / intake to destroy a universe and recreate it, we could hardly take that as a feat indicator, else all standing Avengers will be 3-A or even low 2-C just by being in the battle with a 3-A or low 2-C.
No. Thanos never intended to destroy the universe in Infinity War, and his max attacks on the Avengers don't exceed 5-A as he's holding back.
If Thanos got the Gauntlet in Endgame he would have destroyed the universe and rebuilt one.
In no way does it cause the Avengers to be 3-A.
We should not imho.
The craziest and most notable feat by Thanos is to decimate half of all life forms in the universe. Which I calculated to be a 4-B feat. And that is a feat Thanos has performed.
If he has not delivered an energy output / intake to destroy a universe and recreate it, we could hardly take that as a feat indicator, else all standing Avengers will be 3-A or even low 2-C just by being in the battle with a 3-A or low 2-C.
No. Thanos never intended to destroy the universe in Infinity War, and his max attacks on the Avengers don't exceed 5-A as he's holding back.
If Thanos got the Gauntlet in Endgame he would have destroyed the universe and rebuilt one.
In no way does it cause the Avengers to be 3-A.
- 13,762
- 14,046
- Thread starter
- #25
We should imo.
We should not imho. (Ditto)
No. Thanos never intended to destroy the universe in Infinity War, and his max attacks on the Avengers don't exceed 5-A as he's holding back.
If Thanos got the Gauntlet in Endgame he would have destroyed the universe and rebuilt one.
In no way does it cause the Avengers to be 3-A.
According to your logic, complete IG is 3-A just by wos, at best only Stormbreaker is 3-A (questionable as it "is made to counter complete IG so only 3-A against IG" whatever), and since the Avengers defeat Thanos without complete IG no Avengers is 3-A. Good job.
Just I worry how this logic is not applied into other characters that claims "they can destroy and recreate the universe" blah blah blah.
We should not imho. (Ditto)
No. Thanos never intended to destroy the universe in Infinity War, and his max attacks on the Avengers don't exceed 5-A as he's holding back.
If Thanos got the Gauntlet in Endgame he would have destroyed the universe and rebuilt one.
In no way does it cause the Avengers to be 3-A.
According to your logic, complete IG is 3-A just by wos, at best only Stormbreaker is 3-A (questionable as it "is made to counter complete IG so only 3-A against IG" whatever), and since the Avengers defeat Thanos without complete IG no Avengers is 3-A. Good job.
Just I worry how this logic is not applied into other characters that claims "they can destroy and recreate the universe" blah blah blah.
- 11,095
- 4,317
Stormbreaker does not scale to 3-A. And I completely don't understand how would it scale to any Avenger. It literally doesn't scale to anything other than the Gauntlet
- 2,667
- 1,217
I thought it was already agreed Stormbreaker doesn't scale fully to the I.G. It's very obvious Thanos didn't use much of the power of the Stones in that blast as he was caught by surprise, and as we see with the Snaps, using the full power of the Gauntlet damages it and Thanos quite visibly.
- 13,762
- 14,046
- Thread starter
- #28
So now the Complete IG is theoretically 3-A but not Stormbreaker Thor nor even "normal" Complete IG Thanos scale to that, only when Complete IG Thanos make the snap and decimate half the lives in the universe Thanos has used the potential he can tap into and the IG still breaks and hurt Thanos?Dziga said:
- 4,487
- 732
That3not necessarily true. The snapping is just theatrics tbh, even Gamora implied that. Thanos should be able to use the full potential just by closing his fist.
- 11,095
- 4,317
True, but he never used the full power of the gauntlet against Thor and anyone, or else he would burn his arm and damage the gauntlet
- 2,294
- 2,729
- 2,294
- 2,729
NoKLOL506 said:
