Not really a fallacy whenever staff opinion has always been the priority for the most part.
Not my point, my point is that you seem to try to dismiss any argument from a blue name against you with "not a mod, so I have no reason to defend my claims", which just renders your claims weaker to say the least.
You obviously aren't reading my argument nor the literal conceptual page you keep "sourcing."
I bothered reading the entire thread and its comments, please link particular posts you deem relevant if you are so sure of this so I can bother directly replying to them if you are so confident.
First of all, that's wrong. Plently of characters have High-Godly based on a Type 3 concept. Context matters a lot here as most verses treat varying concepts differently. Secondly the CM page only states you can resist Type 3 if you resist very similar abilities, not that CM Type 3 is useless.
Well, then they probably should lose High-Godly unless an exceptional case was made for them, in which case please link the respective CRT for such additions (not just the acceptation of the CM itself).
Type 3 explicitly grants nothing on its own, a fireball "enhanced" with type 3 CM is still practically no different from a normal fireball by default.
3. Lesser Fundamental Concepts: Concepts that don't meet the same standards as Type 1 or Type 2, such as personal concepts that continue to govern the object in question, merely on a more specific scale, or concepts whose nature is not elaborated upon. Case-by-case specifications and explanations are necessary for such concepts and examples, and they are likely not going to meet the same standards for abilities such as High-Godly regeneration that other concepts may. Conceptual manipulation of this type can be resisted by those who resist sufficiently similar abilities, even if the exact mechanics may differ.
You have yet to prove how its incorrect. I'm using ths standards that me and Deceived have verbatim posted here which was agreed upon by 2 staff members within the first page of this thread.
Only a
single one from
@DarkDragonMedeus,
@Phoenks has no mod right votes as he doesn't mod VSBW, nor is even a thread mod either, so you'd need more staff input regardless, also note that DDM only agreed with the OP, he's yet to comment on further developments on the topic made in the comments, we're looking for accuracy, not merely getting stuff passed or not, after all.
Speaking of which...
It was accepted and applied. The mods did in fact agree to it, none of them rejected it so I'm not sure what your even talking about.
It was not, that was the only mod comment with voting rights (and to neutral at best, no less), nothing from that thread should have been applied with that poor consensus.
@Deceived3596 as of now has only posted
this argument, which has no scans and is not even related to my argument (I'm not proposing to assume the CM involved here has universal range), please don't strawman me. Before a potential nitpick, note that I'm not conceeding the argument either, as my point is that non-universal range can qualify for type 2 or above.
Anyways, let's recap.
Your argument against my point is that
this revision that made the standard that CM in general does not require universal range to qualify, is unusable out of you
thinking it's irrelevant out of apparently thinking it was never concluded and it being 2 years old, to which I replied that not being the case as it was
explicitly concluded and the
standard relevant here hasn't changed since then, then you went on to just
nitpick the current wording over what's
really intended, and from there you and me have been going back and forth reiterating about the same points.
At which point, at best, playind devil's advocate with you, just means the current description of CM should be updated to reflect better the intended standards over trying to abide to an outdated idea long disapproved by the staff.
Okay, looked around and it seems that's just wrong too, two negatives don't make a right, limiting something
to type 3 only out of range is wrong as veheremently said before.
Knew you were going to bring up Kingdom Hearts since you stan it. Major issue is that most of the notable characters have tier1 range so that's irrelevant and untrue. Your comparing a tier 1 verse with sufficient range to a regular plain ass verse that lacks the same type of supportive evidence. Also blud you literally linked me a thread that's 2 years old and hasn't even been closed yet.
Bob you quite literally made a CRT to give them interdimensional ~ Multiversal+ range. This is a massive false comparison if I've ever seen one.
The acceptation of CM for KH was done independently of the range, in fact it was proposed way after, the only thing in the series with tier 2 range (not interdimensional) were the X-Blade, true KH and Sora's Heartless, yet we're more than fine on giving type 1 to all Keyblade users and whatever.
Overall it really seems quite a lot of strawmanning, nitpicking and cherrypicking is around here, chances are this will be replied with even more of such, so I'd appreciate if the other users bother sharing this post and politely comment what they think on the matter.