• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

discussion rules

  1. MasqueTLDF

    DxD Rule addition: Class Scaling

    This CRT is to get a general rule added to the verse page that should be followed when scaling the series, and or get this added to the discussion rules page for DxD. 1. In comparison to Boosts, the class system has been very inconsistent throughout the series despite having equal importance...
    • MasqueTLDF
    • Thread
    • content revision thread discussion rules high school dxd highschool dxd
    • Replies: 48
    • Forum: Content Revision
  2. Lloydblitzed

    Discussion Rules lil Revision

    Permission granted by @Antvasima This is very simple. So I think a little precision should be added to the discussion rules concerning the number of staff approval required to make a CRT pass. I've seen many people think they need 3 staff approval to make CRT pass when the rule only applies to...
  3. Reiner04

    Ben 10: Discussion rule for Alien X

    So as was told in previous threads and suggested by staff like @Sir_Ovens and @Firestorm808 there's a need to put a stop to frequent Alien X upgrade/downgrade threads with same arguments repeated thousands times over. I'm not trying to put a complete stop on any thread pertaining to Alien X...
  4. PrinceofPein

    Discussion Rule for Record of Ragnarok

    There has been quite a number of revision regarding the RoR verse and trying to make it low 2-C or 3-A. This is a verse that the highest feat ever displayed is town level, with a single 5-B statement. Most of the upgrades have been based on faulty logics and non canon materials. Here is one Here...
    • PrinceofPein
    • Thread
    • adam (record of ragnarok) content revision discussion rules record of ragnarok ror staff staff discussion zeus (record of ragnarok)
    • Replies: 31
    • Forum: Content Revision
  5. KingTempest

    Obvious Revisions Revision (Staff Only)

    This is just to revise this Because I've stumbled along threads that are so obvious, like this, where people need to wait days just to implement it. If somebody flies in a series, we need to wait 2 days for an evaluation until we can accept "flight" on the profiles? We gotta wait 2 days before...
  6. ImmortalDread

    Most Important Discussion Rule Section - Staff Thread Creation Guidelines

    Ya, this thread is not permitted by anyone, but this will be the last staff discussion to be ever created without any permission Premise The premise involves the desire to establish additional rules related to the use of the staff board, specifically focusing on guidelines for creating staff...
  7. Arkenis

    JJK - The Speed Ceiling

    (Reread this OP two times for good measure) I am proposing a discussion rule essentially barring the acceptance of calcs for JJK characters for anything mhs+ and higher. So this is something we as JJK supporters have forgotten for a very long time, something Gege put in the manga pretty early...
  8. Deagonx

    New rule regarding inaccessible content

    Good morning, This concept was briefly discussed as an extension of the DMC situation with fake scans. Fake scans are not a new thing to battleboards, but often they are not extremely difficult to identify as we often have full access to the source material that these alleged scans come from...
  9. IdiosyncraticLawyer

    Clarifying the number of staff necessary to approve Tier 1 and 0 revisions

    During a recent confrontation between @Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara and @KLOL506 on the former's Staff Discussion thread seeking to downgrade Devil May Cry from Low 1-C to 2-C, it became apparent that there were disagreements over how many staff are needed to apply CRTs affecting Tier 1 and Tier 0...
  10. Crabwhale

    Addition to the administrator rules

    Hello all. I have for the past while been discussing with Ant regarding the one post limit admins can have regular members write for staff only threads. We've had our dialogue and our differences, but we have settled on increasing the number of allowed posts per user to three. This will not...
  11. ImmortalDread

    Tokyo Revengers: Discussion Rule

    Introduction It is ironic that the thread has been requested by staff members and others to be first concluded and then creation of this thread, as it is intended to be brief and not exceed two pages. Nonetheless, it has now reached a length of five pages, and I must express that the issue is...
  12. Mariogoods

    Request for Discussion: Rule for a Guideline regarding major revisions overlaping minor revisions

    Introduction Recently, I've seen that there are major revisions (e.g. character profile rework) which completely overlap minor revisions. For example: https://vsbattles.com/threads/the-owl-house-luzs-profile.158659, a major revision which completely overlaps...
  13. Mariogoods

    Cool-down period for CRT involving Death Battle-involved combatants

    Introduction As Death Battle has become an influential web series about versus debating and its verdict, questionable or not, would be influential in VS Battles Wiki. As it is possible that Death Battle supported verdict could be potentially more acceptable with less consideration of its...
  14. ImmortalDread

    Staff Discussion rule addition (very non-controversial)

    Bumping once every 24 hours This matter can be approached with ease. It has come to my attention that although this guideline has not been formally documented, it is widely acknowledged and followed. Numerous users have taken it upon themselves to caution their peers against reviving a...
  15. IdiosyncraticLawyer

    Franchise-specific discussion rules revamp

    Currently, many franchise-specific discussion rules we have are ill-explained/outdated. This thread is my attempt to address this; I'll prepare a write-up for the page after the discussion finishes. Firstly, I've analyzed all of the current franchise-specific discussion rules, found the threads...
  16. DaMonkeMan

    Editing some rules for the Wiki

    Permission from Agnaa to post this. First of all, this shouldn't apply to any and every edit/chance made to a page, as some edits can be very evident or blatant, for example: If I made an edit that says "Fire Manipulation" for this character's profile, that should be fine as it's pretty clear...
  17. Deagonx

    No More Slander Threads

    Hello, For those of you that frequent the "Fun & Games" sub-forum, you may have noticed that some popular threads have been deleted, a few of which were named "slander" threads. For those who are unfamiliar, the intent was light-hearted jokes and roasting between friends. They have now been...
  18. The_Yellow_Topaz

    3-B/3-A Kid Buu Discussion Rule Proposal

    PREMISE As discussed on the last thread where the upgrade was last attempted, the topic was discussed in several threads with overwhelming rejection based on the site's standards and the staff's scrutinity over the large gap that the statement implies. Because of this, Staff itself has...
  19. Aachintya31

    Dragon ball Discussion Rules Removal

    Do not attempt to change the current Dragon Ball cosmology and power ratings without new evidence from an ongoing manga or anime series. We have heard all of the arguments many times before, and are so exhausted of constantly dealing with those topics that bringing them up recurrently leads to...
  20. Damage3245

    New My Hero Academia Discussion Rule - Navel Laser

    This is a simple and straight forward revision to create a new Discussion Rule that Aoyama's Navel Laser should not be proposed to be lightspeed. The topic has come up several times before: https://vsbattles.com/threads/possible-my-hero-academia-speed-upgrade.99576/...
  21. StrymULTRA

    Dragon Ball Games - Discussion Rule about Low 1-C

    Alright, so the last thread on Dragon Ball Xenoverse being Low 1-C was made around a bit before the last month, and was (obviously) rejected. And this is not even the 1st time, as we got a fuckload of 5D attempts for Xenoverse and Heroes, like here, here, here, here, here and MANY MORE and this...
    • StrymULTRA
    • Thread
    • discussion rules dragon ball (games) dragon ball heroes dragon ball xenoverse
    • Replies: 80
    • Forum: Content Revision
  22. Artorimachi_Meteoraft

    Minor discussion rule revision

    I saw on the doom discussion rule that it says this Please refrain from trying to downgrade DOOM from 2-A via Davoth not being at full power. This has been discussed numerous times across a number of threads, and has been rejected by multiple sources so what I’m trying to ask to be edited...
  23. Damage3245

    New rule for Content Revision Threads

    I was reminded that we don't have a minimum time period rule for Content Revision Threads after this CRT for One-Punch Man was created, evaluated, accepted, applied and closed in the span of around three hours (all while I was asleep mind you). Now, I may not have anything specific to say for...
  24. FinePoint

    Organizing The Site Rules, Part 3 - Discussion & Versus Thread Rules

    Continuing from here. Also, don't forget to look at this thread by Bobsican, correcting a couple mistakes from the previous thread. I have completed my first draft for the General Discussion Rules and the Versus Thread Rules. Here is the sandbox. Note that this only includes "General Rules"...
  25. Crabwhale

    Clarifying the sufficient number of staff for accepting a revision (STAFF ONLY)

    Hello all. It was recently brought to my attention that we don't have a legitimate rule or something equivalent for the number of staff necessary to pass a revision, instead relying on things like verse size and personal opinion of the overseeing staff in the thread (example: the numerous times...
  26. Deceived3596

    Verse-Specific Rule Removal (And Small Bleach Rule Change)

    Verse-Specific Rule - Currently we have a versus thread rule in place which disallows placing Naruto God-tiers, such as Kaguya Ōtsutsuki and Madara Uchiha against characters from One Piece and Bleach since they previously turned very toxic and the staff members were sick of constantly...
    • Deceived3596
    • Thread
    • bleach content revision discussion rules naruto (series) one piece versus thread rules
    • Replies: 97
    • Forum: Content Revision
  27. Arc7Kuroi

    Removal of a Bleach Discussion Rule

    Introduction I'm going to propose the removal of the following Bleach discussion rule. Do not create discussion threads trying to upgrade Yhwach to 3-A or Low 2-C for attempting to destroy the Soul Society and the Living World until new canon information is released. These terms have been...
  28. LordGriffin1000

    An Unspoken/Unwritten Wiki Standard?

    So in this thread, according to one of our staff members (Shadowbokunohero), we and I quote "also based Wiki standards we assume they they using the potency of their base stat unless specified or greater context is given." When the **** was this standard established? I don't recall this...
  29. Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara

    Rules About Off-Site Threads and Sources

    This has been a recent problem in my eyes as of late, and Antvasima asked for a staff thread to be created regarding the issue, so here we are. Some users will occasionally post threads that are not their own, but are in fact just ripped straight from various off-site sources such as blogs...
  30. Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara

    Touhou Discussion Rule Proposal

    I know I said I was taking a break from Touhou revisions, but this should be pretty quick and easy. Just wanna get this out while I'm not drowning in real life stress. One argument I have regularly seen in regards to Touhou’s speed ratings, both on this forum and off of it, is a single...
  31. Rose_of_Ragnarok

    How to post images from FANDOM on the forum

    So, as most of you already know, whenever we try to post FANDOM images here, it'll show us this icon: I've found a trick to solve that problem. Apparently, you just need to change the 'static' part of the image address to 'vignette' whenever you open the image in a new tab. And the forum will...
  32. Ultima_Reality

    Suggestion for a New Discussion Rule

    STAFF-ONLY THREAD In light of recent events, as well as not-so-recent ones, I decided to make this thread to address a relatively common scenario I've seen popping around, which I am sure at least some of you are familiar with: A thread gets made, someone (Normally a trusted user, such as a...
  33. Artorimachi_Meteoraft

    Jojo/Giorno: Minor discussion rules revision

    just a thing that i felt needed to be fixed in the discussion rules page on the wiki i saw this Also do not try to upgrade Giorno Giovanna beyond Low 2-C. He was placed where he is due to these reasons. i think it should be fixed to Do not upgrade giorno beyond high 8-C (because that's his...
  34. DivineAura44

    About Necro Bumping

    Permission from Antvasima. I've been holding off (because I'm lazy, and I got school, and an afterschool program) but I'm finally gonna do it. The logic behind this is simple. A note in the necro rules stating something along the lines of: A CRT which has been accepted but the revision(s) have...
  35. AKM sama

    Discussion Rule on Infinite Zamasu

    I'm surprised that we don't already have a discussion rule for this recurring topic. We get so many threads trying to change Infinite Zamasu's Low 2-C rating (both upgrades and downgrades) to this day, even though this topic has been debated several times over the last few years, that I think it...
  36. Mr. Bambu

    Banned Users Using Proxies

    It has come to my attention that certain banned users resort to posting their opinions offsite and using proxy users to post them onsite. In my opinion, this is in violation of their ban and, to put it as another user did, just sockpuppeting with extra steps. So I feel a discussion should be...
  37. OneBleachHurricane

    After how long time should we be allowed to bump old content revision and versus threads?

    What is the expected time duration of an inactive Versus Thread before it is decided to be closed due to being a Necro? The only thing the Versus Thread Rules says for a time duration is "inactive for a long time" Antvasima gave the following reply in another thread: "I do not think that we...
  38. TheGatememer

    Even if there is a discussion rule about a verse, can you still make a thread/CRT going against the rule?

    Lets say that you have some arguments that haven't been brought up, or even arguments that haven't really been responded to against a discussion rule. Are you still allowed to make the thread? or is it like set in stone, and any CRTs against it are banned?
  39. KingTempest

    Naruto/Boruto Discussion Rule (Staff Only)

    Brought up here. STAFF ONLY unless permission is granted please. I give @M3X permission to speak since he was the one that brought the idea up. There should be a discussion rule against Momoshiki scaling above Kaguya based on Sasuke's statement. This needs to be inputted ASAP, since this is...
  40. AKM sama

    Regarding linking images from the wiki

    After the UCP update, there have been problems linking to wiki images, as they are automatically shown as small when we use .jpg .png .gif etcetera in the end as required, and when we use the full link it just doesn't show up. For example, if I try to link the image of Celty Sturluson here...
Back
Top